Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP Senator Puts Secret Hold On Bill Restoring Public Access To Presidential Records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:22 PM
Original message
GOP Senator Puts Secret Hold On Bill Restoring Public Access To Presidential Records
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/20/coburn-hold/

GOP Senator Puts Secret Hold On Bill Restoring Public Access To Presidential Records

In Nov. 2001, President Bush signed an executive order that historians called “unprecedented” and “would turn the 1978 Presidential Records Act on its head by allowing such materials to be kept secret ‘in perpetuity.’”

In March, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), along with Republican Reps. Russell Platts (PA), Lacy Clay (MO), and Dan Burton (R-IN) introduced a bill that would “nullify” Bush’s 2001 order “and restore public access to presidential records.” The bill passed the House with a 333-93 vote and the Senate Government Affairs Committee agreed in June to move its version to the floor for a vote, but the bill was stalled when an anonymous Republican senator put a hold on it:

A fight over White House secrecy has taken a new twist, with Senate officials confirming Wednesday that a Republican senator is secretly blocking a bill that would reverse President Bush’s 2001 executive order allowing ex-presidents to seal their records indefinitely. {…}

Suspicion for the hold initially focused on three senators — Ted Stevens of Alaska, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, and George Voinovich of Ohio — who objected in committee to a provision giving ex-presidents 40 days to review document requests. That was changed to 90 days to address their concerns.

Aides to Sens. Stevens and Voinovich said Wednesday that their bosses are not blocking the bill. Coburn aides didn’t respond to inquiries.

If Coburn is the Senator blocking the bill from coming to a vote, it wouldn’t be the only bill that he is currently blocking. Last month, Coburn placed a hold on a suicide prevention bill for military veterans that was introduced by Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA).

You can contact Coburn’s office here or call it at 202-224-5754.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stupid Orwellian Republickers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. what boggles my mind is, why can't the Dems figure out how to do this shit?
The Republican minority has so much goddam control, they might as well still be the senate majority. I NEVER saw such unified obstruction and successful delaying tactics when the Democrats were the minority party. They can even drive the floor agenda to push their politics. I mean, holy shit, they actually got a bill through to "condemn moveon.org" the same week they blocked cloture on bills to expand democracy for DC and Utah and to restore habeas corpus rights. :wtf:

When have the Democrats ever shown this kind of procedural acumen? How far back do I have to go to find a successful Democratic filibuster, where the Republicans backed down on some piece of outrageous legislation and didn't just stick it right back in as a rider to some crazy-ass omnibus package? 1980s?

I can only hope someone in the Democratic caucus is taking notes, because if this keeps going the way it is, it won't be long before Democrats are back in the minority again. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about a sense of the Senate resolution that secrecy
is not compatible with the Constitutional government you all swore to uphold?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't Coburn supposedly an "open government" guy?
I'm pretty sure that's the one thing he usually gets somewhat right...so if it's him, it's major hypocrisy, too.

Of course the republican hypocrisy meter has been pegged for so long this wouldn't even register.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick, for the night shift. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC