Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IRAN did not attack us on 9/11 !!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 06:16 AM
Original message
IRAN did not attack us on 9/11 !!!
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 06:16 AM by annabanana
I can't believe that the media is getting away with PUNKING us again in the exact same way!! Why shouldn't Ahmadinejad lay a wreath for the 9/11 victims? Iran held candlelight vigils in Tehran when the attack happened.

OH.. and BY THE WAY you miserable warmongers, the IAEA says that Iran is complying with all verification requests, and inspection requests. .(Just like Iraq did.. remember?)
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/Statements/2007/ebsp2007n014a.html#iran

We can't let the media get away with this again!!!

edited to add link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because it's really in poor taste
if nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why? They lost people that day too...
Why can't they honor their own victims at the site in which they died, if nothing else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Is that what he has said he wanted to do? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. Ahmadinejad wanted to lay a wreath,
instead of making allies, we are making more enemies. What ever happened to diplomacy?? Now Ahamdinejad is the new Saddam. And Iran had nothing to do with 9/11, and not only Americans were killed that day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. I agree -- why is it in poor taste? I don't understand this.
Iran had NOTHING to do with 9/11.

Oh wait, the people of Iran are brown, aren't they?

Guilty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Actually, Iran is pretty diverse, ethnically...
Coming in practically all shades of color for eyes, skin, and hair. Problem is that our media doesn't portray them that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. I should have known better...
I used to work in Westwood, CA -- they call it "little Tehran". I met many Persians and some of them had lighter skin than me. One of the guys I worked with was from Iran, and introduced me to Persian food -- which I absolutely love!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Portrays them as evil doers.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What is in poor taste? Honoring the dead?
Bigoted much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Iran was the original terrrorist state
In 1979 "students" took American diplomatic personnel hostage and kept them for months, with the full approval of the Iranian government.

Ahmadinijad (sp?) is a Holocaust denier. You certainly understand enough about symbolism to understand what he is up to. How would you feel about the Grand Wizard of the KKK laying a wreath at MLK's grave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Dear Sadie.
That did not happen in a vacuum. WE deposed a popular leader and replaced him with the thoroughly corrupt Shah of Iran WAY before this happened. Do a little googling, a little reading. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. What does that have to do with Ahmadinejad
laying a wreath at Ground Zero? It still isn't the right thing to do.

Besides, regardless of how corrupt the Shah was, what came after was probably far more brutal and repressive than the Shah ever was. Under the Ayatollah the punishment for thievery was amputation of the hand. Women were treated as possessions, stonings were common, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. What does what you're saying have to do with laying
a wreath? Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. And get this, WE funded and trained al queda and built the "caves"
in Afghanistan. Further irony, al queda is anti-Iranian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Why would we condemn a peacefull gesture? Hmmm? Why?
So's not to put a humane face on this guy. Makes it easier for the the White House to whip up hatred against him.

Joe Six Pack would be less inclined to bomb the shit out of a guy who they just say laying a wreath at Ground Zero.

Its spin control.

Its message control.

Its mind control.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. but, but, but...the people of Iran really wanted the Shah!
They just didn't realize it at the time. It was our duty to help them recognize what was really good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Bullshit, when the US deposed Mossedegh, they were playing the role of the terrorist!
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 08:43 AM by Solon
And before them there was Britain, France, Germany, Spain, etc. that were all terrorist states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sadie4629 Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. So somehow that made it okay to
take diplomatic personnel hostage???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. What does that have to do with Ahmadinejad?
Hypocritical much? Go back and read the thread. Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. What makes it ok to go into a country and install a government?
Uh yeah, I think that would piss me off if I lived in that country. It might make me a little "less tolerant" for the people from that country that worked at the embassy.

Is there ever a good reason for terrorism? I don't think so.

Are we just as guilty? You bet we are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Actually, from a tactical point of view, yes...
The first coup started in the U.S. embassy, and after the revolution in 1979, the best way to secure the new government was to prevent another U.S. led coup, which means taking the U.S. embassy. Besides that, to the Iranian people who did take those hostages, they didn't know who was CIA and who wasn't. It was the CIA's bright idea to infiltrate our own diplomatic corps, blame them for the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. What are you saying: everybody who died in the WTC was Jewish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Poor taste is not letting him lay the wreath.
It's an insult to the 9-11 victims.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. And why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Iran also facilitated the attacks on Afghanistan after 9/11
It's all bullshit -villify then obliterate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly right. After the ways in which we've screwed Iran
(google peacock throne) We are in no position to continue the irresponsible lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Andrea Mitchell "reported" it this morning and immediately her report was biased.
Edited on Thu Sep-20-07 07:38 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
She called it a photo-op. This is not reporting, this is blatant opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Andrea Mitchell is one of the worst of the worst... . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Amen. I'm surprised she didn't put on a big pout and stamp her feet, "He's a bad
bad man".

I wish she'd retire with the old man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. And of course we all know......
that only TWO people have the RIGHT to use it as a PHOTO OP. A monkeyboy and a cross dresser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. True, but the bush junta are on a reckless agenda!!!
And no one cares to stop them.

A sad era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Neither did IRAQ.
But that hasn't stopped Corporate McPravda from vaulting the propaganda.

Robert Parry has pegged the lying warmongers:

Media Crisis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. My point exactly.
They have just returned to the same playbook that worked last time. Can we "catapult" high enough and fast enough to keep this one train on the track?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
26. Iran was helping the US in Afghanistan until bush named them part
of the "Axis of Evil."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC