Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secretary of State, who keeps private life shrouded, co-owns home with female filmmaker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:43 PM
Original message
Secretary of State, who keeps private life shrouded, co-owns home with female filmmaker
Not that there's anything wrong with that.

http://rawstory.com//news/2007/Secretary_of_State_who_keeps_private_0914.html

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice co-owned a home and shared a line of credit with another woman, according to Washington Post diplomatic correspondent Glenn Kessler, who reveals the information in his new book, The Confidante: Condoleezza Rice and the Creation of the Bush Legacy.

Kessler discussed the revelations with talk-show host and gay activist Michaelangelo Signorile Friday.

According to the book, Rice owns a home together with Randy Bean, a documentary filmmaker who once worked with Bill Moyers. Kessler made the discovery by looking through real estate records.

Bean explains the joint ownership and line of credit in the book by saying she had medical bills which left her financially drained and Rice helped her by co-purchasing the house along with a third man, Coit Blacker, a Stanford professor. Blacker is openly gay.

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, we have a Secretary of State? I had forgotten
she seems to not be doing squat these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Several weeks ago there were reports that Condi was disagreeing with Shrub.
Suddenly, she's GONE from any public exposure at all! Looks like Shrub SOP to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretty_lies Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, Good For Her
Shame that she had to conceal something from her bigoted base that civilized folks shouldn't care about either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. The shame is all hers...
She is just added to the list of the hypocrites in this hatemongering administration. The shame is all hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You call her a hypocrite?
I have never heard her say anything against gays. Do you have a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. the problem is that she willingly works for an administration that does say things
about gays, she enables it with her silence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretty_lies Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. The Bush Administration Is Not That Unfriendly To Gays
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 02:12 PM by pretty_lies
Bush and his administration, while using all the code words to suggest to their conservative base they want to roll back gay rights, have basically supported the status quo on gay rights.

http://civilliberty.about.com/od/profiles/p/george_w_bush.htm

Lesbian and Gay Rights - Status Quo: Although President Bush strongly advocated a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage at the federal level, it has never passed. Bush has made no attempt to rescind President Clinton's Executive Order 13087, banning discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in federal employment. Bush opposed a 2007 bill that would have federalized hate crime investigations while adding sexual orientation to the list of hate crime categories, but his stated rationale had to do with the federalization of hate crimes, not the addition of sexual orientation as a protected category.

That said, they're a bunch of war criminals, but it's not clear to me that Condi has been hypocritical over gay rights, even if she IS gay.

The whole idea of liberals using conservatives' sexuality as a weapon against them is abhorrent and bigoted. The Craig scandal left a foul taste in my mouth for that reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Bullshit. Absolute bullshit.
Bushco has added fuel to existing anti gay fires, and has been complicit in outlawing asme sex unions at state levels. They have eliminated access to workplace protections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. You can't be serious.
They ran much of the 2004 campaign based off pure homophobia. Gay marriage was what they used to get the vote out.

You're suggesting that because the rewriting of the Constitution failed the Bush Administration should be forgiven for endorsing it? Let me assure you the reason it failed was not because Bush helped defeat it. And while Bush opposed hate crimes legislation that is OK according to you because he did not publicly state he was doing it because of gays being included.

If you think it is "abhorrent and bigoted" of us to call out the abhorrent bigots you are dead wrong, the Bush Administration is extremely hateful and I do not understand how anyone could suggest they are not that bad for the GLBT community.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
52. Bwahahaha! Pretty Lies, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. That's absolutely wrong.
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 07:06 PM by terrya
Sponsoring and advocating the Federal Marriage Amendment, several appoinments of virulently anti-gay persons to various positions within the administration, an attempt early on to roll back the protections gay and lesbian Federal Government employees got during the Clinton Administration. Plus refusing to lift "DADT" in the military (and what about that deafening silence from the White House when General Peter Pace made those vile comments about homosexuality being immoral when asked about gay and lesbian soldiers serving openly in the military)

This administration opposes hate crimes legislation. And this President will veto the Employment Non-Discrimination Act when Congress passes it. Count on it.

This administration is openly hostile towards GLBT Americans. The evidence is pretty overwhelmng.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretty_lies Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. None Of This Is Different To What Clinton Did
With the exception of the Federal Marriage Amendment, which didn't pass.

See my above post. Bush could have repealed the federal anti-discrimination law. He hasn't.

I don't dispute that the Republicans are anti-gay. My point is that Bush is more talk than substance on rolling back gay rights, he panders to his base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. "Clinton did it too?"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
65. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Fading Captain Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
76. Nonsense
The Bush administration worked to make sure that several states had gay marriage votes in an effort the shore up the electoral college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
56. And just look...
...at all the dirty minds here today. Because she co-owns a home with two other people, one being female, and the other being an openly gay male, some here automatically believe Rice must be a lesbian.

There is absolutely no hypocrisy to point out. Where is the proof that she is a lesbian in the first place. Co-ownership isn't going to cut it. Or is this going to be another so and so is gay because they are right wing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. I don't quite get it myself.
I have never, ever, heard her saying anything disparaging towards gay and lesbian people. On the contrary, a while back she swore in a gay man to an Administration post...and she pointedly acknowledged his partner.

I don't know if she's a lesbian or not. I can only hope that this doesn't turn into a "so and so is right wing, so they must be gay" thing we've seen here ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreigncorrespondent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #57
64. That's my fear, terrya...
...and I see it is becoming true, just by reading a couple of threads (including this one) this morning.

The way some of the minds work around here. It is exactly what the right wing does in order to discriminate against us, they head directly into the bedroom and don't look back.

People co-share and co-own home together all the time, and there is nothing sexual about it. But because Condi works for the Bush* admin, this news automatically makes her a lesbian, and a hypocrite, and I for one am getting fed up with that kind of attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. I hear you, foreigncorrespondent.
I've seen it here before...and it really got sickening during the Larry Craig thing.

It's...reflexive for some people around here. And pleading "oh, it's the hypocrisy!" doesn't mitigate how disgusting it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatchling Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. What shame?
Whatever "may" be going on between them, it is at least done in the privacy of their own home, not in a public bathroom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Good for you . .
. . for saying that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. Wrong. So very, very WRONG.
"had to conceal something from her bigoted base"?

WRONG.

That statement assumes that she was somehow BORN with
a "base", and that she has no choice of who is in it.

WRONG.

She CHOSE to build a "base", she CHOSE to build it by
appealing to bigots.

She could have built a different base while being HONEST
about who she is, but she CHOSE not to do so.

"Had to" doesn't enter into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know. Shocking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bean and Rice?
Oh, the jokes that can come out of that.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Blacker, Bean and Rice, no less
Isn't that a delicacy in the South
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. "isn't that a delicacy in the South?" .... ummm, No! Try pinto beans & corn bread
Black beans & rice is more of Latin American or South Western dish. Try any Cuban restaurant in Miami. Black beans & *yellow* rice is even better, imho.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. I thought beans and rice is real popular in New Orleans and around
that neck of the woods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Most Cajun places I've eaten use either Pinto beans or Red beans
aka 'red beans ~n~ rice' or 'cajun pintos'. Someone from New Orleans may be able to set me straight on that if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. and she was a Randy Bean at that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
40. LOL!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
49. That's real Cuban food
Arrest this rice pudding :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. hadn't thought of that
:rofl: thanks for making almost choke on my pita bread I'm snacking on :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Glad to be of assistance
I guess it really should be RICE and BEANs, not the other way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. That kind of information is easy to get by going to the county title office
and looking up recorded deeds.

Sorry, but yawn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. wow, what a great friend
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 01:51 PM by AZDemDist6
I always buy houses for my gal pals when they run into trouble, don't you??

:hide:

nice looking lady who has a long list of liberal jobs, PBS ect

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rice has friends, who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la la Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. THAT'S what surprises me! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Who gives a damn who is gay and who is not?
Is there ever going to be a day when someone's gayness is not an issue? Don't gays have the right to privacy and a right to what ever political party they want to belong to? I don't get stories like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. The First amendment ensures a free press so we can know what
our reps and appointees are up to.

Given the anti-gay policies of this white house, this is news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
60. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. When they support those who promote anti-gay agendas
I'm sorry, but it IS an issue. I'm not really opining on this case, because it could be true that Ms. Bean couldn't afford a house in the very pricey Palo Alto area and that they simply co-own the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Indeed Indeed Indeed
When will people here at DU get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
43. When they get out of our bedrooms, we'll get out of theirs...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. It's not whether anyone is Gay or
NOT..it's the Hypocricy. I should think that would be obvious by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
72. Some days it seems more important to a certain group on DU than to the GOP in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
theNotoriousP.I.G. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. you didn't just say that did you?
OY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. No, I didn't just read that here. Did I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. Here she is - photo and bio >>>
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 02:07 PM by Stephanie


Randy Bean
Executive Producer
Documentaries and Television Projects

Research Interests
Randy oversees the creation, production and distribution of Center content in the video format. She is an experienced producer,director and writer, having worked for public television stations and network news divisions. She was a Knight Fellow at Stanford, and has worked at the University in a variety of executive producer roles since 1996.

Randy Bean is executive producer for documentaries and special television projects at Stanford University. She serves as a consultant on media and communications for the SCL, and oversees the creation, production and distribution of Center content, in video and other formats. Bean is an award-winning documentary filmmaker and experienced broadcast journalist. She worked as a producer with Bill Moyers at WNET in New York, and covered major news stories for both ABC News and NBC News in their Washington bureaus. She came to Stanford as a Knight Professional Journalism Fellow, and moved to California to be a staff producer, director and writer of current affairs programs and investigative documentaries at KQED in San Francisco. She founded the Stanford Channel in 1995 and managed its operations until 2001. She has worked as writer and executive producer on a number of broadcast-quality Stanford productions, including Becoming Stanford: The Making of an American University, Seizing Power: The Steel Seizure Case Re-visited, The Stanford Presidency and A World of Change: The International Initiative at Stanford University. Her latest Stanford production, "What Were They Thinking?" Originalism, Music and the Constitution, will air on public television in Spring 2007. Bean attended Northwestern University and has a B.A. with special honors in political science from the George Washington University.

http://longevity2.stanford.edu/personRandy.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. Holy cow! She once interned wtih Bill Moyers! lol

http://knight.stanford.edu/fellows/1982/index.html

Knight Fellowships Class of 1982



Top row: Evans Witt, Walter Robinson, Brenda Worthington, Elisabet Van Nostrand, James O'Hara, Fatima Cabanas, Dennis McDougal, Lyle Nelson, (director), Diane Lindquist, Randy Bean
Front row: Molly Noone (staff), James Files, Lydia Wasowicz, Edvin Beitiks, Bailey Thomson, Marek Samotyj, Amy Witt, Henrick Bering-Jensen, Qing Luo, Harry Press (associate director)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. lol! FOOTBALL brought them together >>>



Rice earned her PhD in international relations at Denver in 1981, and became an assistant professor at Stanford, where the football program was flagging. She went to every home game anyway, and met her best friend in the process--Randy Bean, also a daughter of a minister who raised her to love football.

"People ask how we became friends and I always say, `God and football,’’’ said Bean, a documentary filmmaker for Stanford. "I could forgive Condi her politics because she loved football, and likewise she could forgive mine.’’

http://www.eastandard.net/archives/cl/hm_news/news.php?articleid=12571&date=7/2/2005



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Bean was helping Rice install a webcam! >>>


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=14185234

When Bush won reelection in 2004, Rice was ready to go back to California. She hadn't expected to be national security advisor in the first place. She told friends she hadn't even wanted that job because her father had been terribly ill during Bush's first campaign. Though she had been Bush's foreign policy advisor in the 2000 campaign, she wanted to return to California to be with her dad. But Bush persisted, and Rice finally said yes. Randy Bean had begun to explore installing a webcam system and other ways for Rice to keep in touch with her father when he died just four days after she was named national security advisor. "That was his gift to her," Bean said. "He freed her to go to Washington, unburdened."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
51. The real news here is that condi
went in with a Liberal to buy a house?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
24. She's not gay. She once referred to her husband. Somebody named George. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
42. Plus, she has a longtime male "escort"
Gene Upshaw...:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
28. COME AND KNOCK ON OUR DOOR!
We'll be waiting for you.

(Anyone know the rest of the song?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
33. Rice and,,,Beans?????
You telling me Rice has a relationship with Beans who knew :shrug::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Excellent. "Beans and rice is very nice." And 3's Company, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
38. This sounds just a tad off for the Moral Majority View
on housing situations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. They probably wouldn't be too happy that Ms. Bean..
is a raging liberal either..:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
39. But I thought that Bush was her husband?
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 02:42 PM by midlife_mo_Jo
Maybe she's bi I'm sure the bisexual community can't wait to claim her.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. The community hasn't named me our official spokesperson, yet,
but I know I'd rather she hung her hat somewhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
46. Condoleezza is not gay, she thinks Bush is her husband
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. OMG
The only thing I've heard about Condi's personal life (from a friend in DC) is that she's a devout member of a somewhat conservative fundamentalist church. OMG . . . does this mean she's a . . .fundalesbian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
59. "Private life shrouded"? Me no understand.
Edited on Fri Sep-14-07 07:55 PM by Canuckistanian
I thought EVERYONE in politics had to undergo a STRINGENT personal lifestyle check.

How did this happen? Heads will roll, I promise you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
61. And?...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maine-ah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
62. Rice & Bean
or Beans and Rice...

doesn't that just make anyone else giggle?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
63. So?? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Care to elaborate any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. Well
I just don't get the big deal. So what she's got gay friends. Her best friend, who happens to be gay, happened to go through come hard financial times and Rice was able to help her out. I know that if I was in a situtation where I could help out I would in a heart beat (and she would do the same for me as well).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
68. We're Supposed To Stay Out Of People's Bedrooms, No?
And that's regardless if this has any bearing in reality or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. This administration is dedicated to NOT staying out of bedrooms...
That's why this is relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
69. Boy, are we taking a leap with this story
If two people have a mutual friend who is gay, it does not make them gay. If two people are the same gender live together, it does not make them gay. If two people have mutual interests or shared financial accounts, it does not make them gay. The article lays out some facts, but it is we who are reading between the lines. Not everything is always as it appears on the surface though.

And even if it turned out that they are both gay - what business is it of ours? There is nothing wrong with being gay and I feel that implying someone is makes it almost sound as if we are accusing them of doing something wrong. How insulting. Also, everyone is entitled to a private life -- even public figures who rub us the wrong way.

For the second time in as many years I am finding myself defending Dr. Rice much to my surprise (Two years ago I ratted out a co-worker who was displaying a particularly offensive political caricature of her). She has done nothing immoral, wrong, or illegal. Whether she is straight or gay is no one's business but her own.

And for those who think she supports gay bashing by proxy by virtue of being in the Bush Administration, I challenge you to find one public statement she has made that could even remotely be considered anti-gay or pro-heterosexual.

I do not agree 100% with every view held by my boss but I still perform my job to the best of my ability. That could also be the case with Dr. Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-14-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Nothing wrong with being gay. But there may be something very wrong with being part
of an anti-gay administration while gay.

Bush isn't just Rice's "boss". She's part of a policy making group.

As to Bush being anti-gay - do you actually need more than a constitutional amendment denying gays equal rights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
74. Gee... I hope 'don't ask don't tell' doesn't bite her in the ass.
"SLDN is aware of cases where servicemembers have been investigated for owning a home with a person of the same gender," Steve shared. http://www.sldn.org/templates/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-15-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
75. So what? Is it impossible for you to co-own something with somebody without having
a sexual relationship (same sex or not).

So, Rice co-owns a house with another woman. This does not make gay or straight.

rawstory should be ashamed to even push the issue. This is about as stereotyping as the RW would do.

I am more interested by knowing why Rice did not go and testify in front of the SFRC instead of letting Crocker fry for her. Is she afraid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC