Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Democrats in Congress Have a Dilemma

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:29 PM
Original message
The Democrats in Congress Have a Dilemma

A majority of Americans want the US Troops out of Iraq with slow draw down.
If the US Troops withdraw from Iraq there might be bigger bloodbath there than
there is now and Iran may have a larger influence in Iraq than it now does. The oil
may not flow to America via US Oil Corps. The Dems would be blamed for all
of these unfortunate events, should they occur. Therefore, most of the Dems do
not want to be responsible for a US Troop Evacuation. It seems that the Dems are in
Catch22 situation, just where the Busholini Regime & the Rwing want them to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. bah.
Iraq is already an utter disaster. Do you realize that nearly 20% are refugees, that the death toll is around 1 million, that the gov't is in shambles, that the infrastructure is in dire shape, and that ethnic cleansing in much of Baghdad is "mission accomplished".

Get out now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. We put the Dems in charge at Capitol Hill for a reason
We wanted them to force Herr Decider to bring the occupation of Iraq to a halt, but it appears that many of them don't have the stomach for it. George W. Bush must be impeached. For all this talk about a "New Direction for America," I'm just not seeing where the 110th Congress has been all that effective. George W. Bush must be impeached. Meanwhile, the body count in Iraq continues to grow, and growing Iranian influence in Iraq has been inevitable as of March 2003. George W. Bush must be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bush &/or Cheney will not be Impeached. The US Occupation
will continue even if a Dem becomes the next Pres., which is not a sure thing by a long shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree. In fact, I wrote
an OP saying that yesterday. But I do think that the odds are strongly in favor of the dems winning the presidency and increasing their majorities, which will lead to a substantial drawdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If Bush is not impeached, then he gets away with his crimes...
...and the 110th Congress will have failed the American people. George W. Bush must be impeached. An example needs to be made of George W. Bush, since apparently we couldn't make an example of the White House Plot organizers in the 1930's that Gen. Smedley Butler blew the whistle on. George W. Bush must be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I agree,
and I also think that if the Dem's pursued impeachment against Cheney that we would see a BIG attitude change with the Bu$h Admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. But "we" left enough Republicans in there to ensure the war continues. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. "The oil may not flow to America via US Oil Corps."
Edited on Thu Sep-06-07 09:43 PM by Amonester
The Dems would be blamed for that?

I don't think so, since that oil does not belong to US Oil Corps...

Anyway, that oil would not flow to America. It flows to India, Japan, and Australia.

Perhaps you meant "the obscene profits" would not flow into a few off-shore bank accounts that belong to a few oligarchs?

Why would anyone blame the Dems for not allowing that war crime to happen? (on edit: ... to continue?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. "that oil does not belong to US Oil Corps"
Many people would not agree with that. After all the dead & wounded Troops & $Billions I bet millions of Americans feel that the Iraqi oil should flow to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. the millions you're talking about must be the 20-something percent
brain-dead king georgie's supporters & enablers (of which many "Dems" elite R...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ever heard of the United Nations?
They were formed especially for this kind of thing. Remember NATO and how they managed the quick, successful war in the Balkans?

Prior to Bush's unilateral invasion of Iraq, the US hasn't gone to war by itself since, I dunno, the Civil War?

Reject Bush's framing of foreign policy as something the US must do on its own. We are supposed to do this with allies, with peacekeeping forces.

Lets get back to doing that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. they let it happen. let them drown in their shredded impeachment papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Dems really believe that they can keep the US Occupation
going and still win more seats & the Pres./VP spot in '09. It's a long time 'till then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC