Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican Paul Craig Roberts says "don't blame China",

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:33 PM
Original message
Republican Paul Craig Roberts says "don't blame China",
Edited on Tue Aug-21-07 05:34 PM by Elwood P Dowd
and he's correct. US Corporations and Wall Street investors cooked up all these fake free trade deals and outsourcing to line their pockets with billions in extra earnings. Millions of Americans lose their jobs, real wages start falling, and the dollar tanks.

http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_2320.shtml

<snip>

Such a policy is satisfying to some in its ideological purity. But what it means in practice is that the Americans, who are displaced in their professional and manufacturing jobs by offshoring and work visas for foreigners, also cannot find work in the unskilled and semi-skilled jobs taken over by illegal immigrants. A free market policy that gives the bird to American labor is not going to win acceptance by the population. Such a policy serves only the owners of capital and its senior managers.

Free market economists will dispute this conclusion. They claim that offshoring and unrestricted immigration provide consumers with cheaper prices in the market place. What the free market economists do not say is that offshoring and unrestricted immigration also provide US citizens with lower incomes, fewer job opportunities, and less satisfying jobs. There is no evidence that consumer prices fall by more than incomes so that US citizens can be said to benefit materially. The psychological experience of a citizen losing his career to a foreigner is alienating.

The free market economists ignore the fact that a country that offshores its production also offshores its jobs. It becomes dependent on goods and services made in foreign countries, but lacks sufficient export earnings with which to pay for them. A country whose workforce is being reallocated, under pressure of offshoring, to domestic services has nothing to trade for its imports. That is why the US trade deficit has exploded to over $800 billion annually.

Among all the countries of the world, only the US can get away with exploding trade deficits. The reason is that the US inherited from Great Britain, exhausted by two world wars, the reserve currency role. To be the reserve currency country means that your currency is the accepted means of payment to settle international accounts. Countries pay their oil import bills in dollars and settle the deficits in their trade accounts in dollars.

The enormous and continuing US deficits are wearing out the US dollar as reserve currency. A time will come when the US cannot pay for the imports, on which it has become ever more dependent, by flooding the world with ever more dollars.

Offshoring and free market ideology are turning the US into a third world country. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, one-quarter of all new US jobs created between June 2006 and June 2007 were for waitresses and bartenders. Almost all of the net new US jobs in the 21st century have been in domestic services.

Free market economists simply ignore the facts and proceed with their ideological justifications of open borders, a policy that is rapidly destroying the ladders of upward mobility for the US population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yet China and India are building middle classes...
:think:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. While we destroy ours in order to create billionaires
and kill our own people with contaminated imports.

:think: yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So corporations are dismantling America, to leave us all to rot?
Edited on Tue Aug-21-07 06:30 PM by HypnoToad
Please forgive me, but I'm not very good at thinking today...

But I could think of lots of things; some of them even good ones; long-term speaking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Long-term?
I remember all the "long-term" promises made for NAFTA. When you go back read the hype from 1993, you find the exact opposite has happened with all those "long-term" free trade promises in 2007. And, it's getting worse with each passing year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Well, if our time is over, it's over.
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "free market" doesn't really exist does it?
Isn't it just a euphemism for corporate control? And was it really true that Sadam was going to accept euros instead of dollars for Iraqi oil? I guess taking the above points about the dollar as reserve currency into account makes more sense of our going into Iraq. Not that it was a good thing, but it does clear up the murk a bit.

And Elwood, Harvey is in my back garden...and on the front porch. Uh huh....:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elwood P Dowd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I wondered where Harvey had been today.
He better get home soon. Happy Hour has started.

:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Every hour is happy.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Corporate control--correct....
"Free Market" is just another way freedom has come to mean just the opposite. See "Free Trade" as well. When countries cannot make their own market decisions because it violates "free trade" agreements, it's more like Forced Trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Thank you, very much.
Edited on Tue Aug-21-07 11:35 PM by MissMarple
It is a big pet peeve of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's exactly right
and furthermore- this IS in fact something that we can blame Clinton and other far right panderers and enablers for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can we do away with NAFTA and all the other treaties that allow the rich to get richer....
while impoverishing the rest of us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-21-07 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I think it is one of those complicated problems.
Honestly, I think some of the NAFTA supporters were trying to do a good thing, but it just got all screwed up. It was because of the bad people and a general all around naivete about global economics. And no one, I assume, knows how to fix it. Just another big mess to clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-22-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The initial idea of NAFTA was to allow corporations to do anything they wanted....
That sure doesn't sound good to me. However, it wasn't sold to me that way. Boy was I gullible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC