Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Allure is Gone. The Fading of Condi Rice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:29 PM
Original message
The Allure is Gone. The Fading of Condi Rice
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Pentagon_Inspector_General_to_release_investigation_0207.html


Feb. 8 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush, riding high after his re-election two years ago, tapped his confidante and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice to chart an ambitious, second-term foreign policy as secretary of state.

In February 2005, Rice, already the star of the Bush cabinet, described for reporters on her maiden cross-Atlantic trip as secretary ``the tremendous opportunities ahead of us,'' including spreading ``freedom and liberty to places they've never been.''

Two years later, few of those goals have been realized. Iraq, and possibly Lebanon and the Palestinian territories, are sliding into civil war, Iran is pursuing its nuclear ambitions unchecked, Russia is ignoring demands for political and economic openness, and China is building ties with U.S. adversaries.

Rice's public approval rating is slipping, and she is getting more of the flak for the prosecution of the Iraq war than ever before.

``Condi is seen as being the loyal implementer of the president's policy priorities, and as a result she's getting the same kind of treatment as her boss,'' said Lee Feinstein, a former State Department policy planner now at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington.

Last month, that new criticism was evident as Rice was pummeled in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee while trying to sell Bush's troop-increase plan for Iraq. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, even questioned whether Rice, 52, was capable of a wise decision in Iraq because she is childless and won't suffer a personal loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. There was allure? - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Never. No allure that I could detect.
Unless you find oil tankers charming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. MMCA
Media Manufactured Condi Allure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. WHEN are the media going to start holding her lying feet to the fire?
Edited on Thu Feb-08-07 10:34 PM by Gabi Hayes
she's told more out and out, documentable lies than anybody in that rotten admninistration, Cheney included. he's much craftier in assembling his BS than she is.

is there a more transparent liar since Nixon?

those fluttering eyelids, the quavering voice, the shaking head-that-says-no when she's assuring us she's telling us yes.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. She's incompetent. I always knew that. She could only get ahead by
attaching herself to someone like &* who requires unquestioning adoration and dispenses favors accordingly.

It's a type of prostitution. Men do it too, see "Brownie" at FEMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I saw her big ugly mug on
time magazine in the library this week..didn't even bother to read what they had to say on the front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yeah.
her grimace/frown/scowl thing probably isn't the thing to put on covers if they want to sell mags . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It's her insides that are oozing out and
making her so buttugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. What has she ever done except parrot the Bushco party line?
At least a guy like Rummy had his own ideas and initiatives, like the streamlined, blitzkrieg "shock and awe" military that doesn't require 300K troops to occupy a country!

Okay, his ideas were whacked and didn't work, but at least they were his. Condi? Bupkus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Condi's job isn't ideas.
Condi's job is to be the token black woman. Republicans have an attack machine set up so that if any of their token minority / female spokespeople get criticised, it's immediately labeled racism or sexism. And the media is terrified of those labels. You saw it with Clarence Thomas and Harriet Meirs.

To the Republicans, the value of these three - Rice, Thomas, and Meirs, isn't in their ideas. Their value is that they adhere to an old white guy's opinions - Scalia for Thomas, Bush for Meirs and Rice - and thus provide a shield against criticisms of those opinions due to their sex / ethnicity.

THis is of course, the republican idea of multiculturalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nonsense. Boxer said condi "had no skin in the game," a legitimate criticism.
No one -- absolutely no one -- in the bush administration has any "skin in the game" where Iraq is concerned. There is no close blood relative of any bush administration member at risk because of this war. Probably no blood relative at all. They do protect their own, and the rest be damned.

I can't believe this baseless accusation against Boxer is still being recycled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. A nasty swipe at Sen Boxer
and totally unneccessary......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Agreed...
that swipe at Senator Boxer had no place in the story and is taken out of concept of what Senator Boxer really said and I agreed with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-09-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Funny CNN just did a story on this but it started with her "rock star" status
If I didn't know any better I would have thought it was the beginning of a campaign for her to run for something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC