|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:11 PM Original message |
Leahy: "THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THEY ARE IN CONTEMPT OF THE VALID ORDER OF THE CONGRESS" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. chimpeach! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Leahy gets it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. The better fucking DO something and quick before this admin takes it up a notch and declares martial |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snappyturtle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 05:12 PM Response to Reply #4 |
17. I agree with you. Heaven forbid Reid would call a special session. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:25 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Indeed he does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. Please Leahy- issue contempt charges NOW!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. He can't do it alone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
7. Wake up The Nancy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. that's funny -- she's awake already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-21-07 09:16 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Apparently not, given the avalanche of abuses by the executive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-22-07 02:24 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. Oh, I think sleepiness is hardly an excuse for inactivity at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
partylessinOhio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, now what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RogueBandit (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
9. Now the real test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
10. Is this all games-men-ship between Leahy's committee and the White House? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Disturbed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 04:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Regular Contempt of Congress is useless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Can you explain the difference from both a legal and congressional standpoint? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 04:47 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. This article does a decent job of covering the basics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 04:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Excellet point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whistle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 11:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Yet the article suggests about inherent contempt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
12. Chimpeach! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
18. Fine. Now WTF does he plan on DOING about it? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-20-07 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
19. Yeah..so...do something about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-21-07 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
22. it is way past the time to slap these guys down now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Aug-21-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
23. Nothing new. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-22-07 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
25. Hey Pat, listen to YOUR words....'they are in contempt' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC