Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

7 GOP Senators backtrack: Now they want Iraq Debate!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:35 PM
Original message
7 GOP Senators backtrack: Now they want Iraq Debate!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/07/AR2007020702550_pf.html

Hmmm... did they get an earful from their constituents, perhaps?

Senate Republicans who earlier this week helped block deliberations on a resolution opposing President Bush's new troop deployments in Iraq changed course yesterday and vowed to use every tactic at their disposal to ensure a full and open debate.

In a letter distributed yesterday evening to Senate leaders, John W. Warner (Va.), Chuck Hagel (Neb.) and five other GOP supporters of the resolution threatened to attach their measure to any bill sent to the floor in the coming weeks. Noting that the war is the "most pressing issue of our time," the senators declared: "We will explore all of our options under the Senate procedures and practices to ensure a full and open debate."

<snip>

But some Republicans were uneasy about appearing to have stymied the debate. The letter appeared so suddenly that, although it was addressed to Reid, the Democratic leader had not seen his copy before Warner read the text on the Senate floor.

"Monday's procedural vote should not be interpreted as any lessening of our resolve to go forward advocating the concepts" of the resolution, the letter said. "The current stalemate is unacceptable to us and to the people of this country."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I called Coburn and Inhofe, and it was apparent to me their office was
getting calls.

Or, their staffers have just labeled me a librul, to be disregarded. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. It seemed bizarre to me that they were all lining up to protect Bushco
I still would love to know the inside story on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Flip-Floppers!
The wanted to debate before they didn't want to debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Could it be because the House
got tired of waiting for the Senate to move, and has scheduled debates of their own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Homer12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think they realized they were digging....
..Their own political graves in a lost fight. The houses actions raised the ante and flushed out the Publicons in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-08-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That sounds right
I don't think they've gotten used to being the minority party yet. This just makes them look like the hypocrites they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC