Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Someone Explain What Difficulty Is In Recovering Vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:42 PM
Original message
Can Someone Explain What Difficulty Is In Recovering Vehicles
I don't understand why they can't get a big, powerful, construction crane, and have divers go down and secure vehicles to cables/ropes/etc., and then lift each car out of the water, one by one.

Am I missing something? How complicated could it be to have a crane recover each vehicle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. They have bridge debris to deal with, for one thing
They may have to remove it before it would be safe to go after the submerged vehicles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the same thing....Maybe they're down in the muck and
sinking....I just don't get it either....thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lots of problems
High currents, poor visibility, debris from bridge. It's not as easy as it looks in the movies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You mean you can't just wave your magic wand at it? Pooh - I'm turning to Law & Order then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. :)
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. large pieces of bridge are on top of the cars.....
or adjacent to the cars and the bridge is moving in the river currents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. The rubble is unstable, and they might create more destruction
if they start pulling stuff out before they have studied it..

I don't see why they don't just close those two locks and drain that section completely for a few days so they could assess the damage more safely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Do you think the resivoir can hold 100% of the Mississippi's flow for 2 or 3 days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. See why I never became an engineer
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. And the area is too big to cofferdam effectively in a short time.
Although I'm guessing they'll have to cofferdam parts of it to complete the investigation.

speculatively,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. They already have restricted the flow, but the first attempt created more problems.
I'm just trying to summarize what I've heard from local news sources -- I live in Minnesota -- so please forgive the lack of definitative documentation.

The Army Corps of Engineers drastrically cut the flow back earlier today, but it created a sort of vacuum effect that ended up increasing the danger to the rescue teams. So now they're trying to find the most optimal flow.

A big problem is all the debris in the river -- huge chunks of concrete on top of the cars that are under water. Other problems are the strong current and murkiness of the water.

And as someone above pointed out, it's simply not possible to hold back the whole Mississippi river.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomInTib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Besides all the physical elements, those vehicle positions must be recorded.
There is going to be a huge investigation and numerous lawsuits.

Some people will spend the rest of their careers on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Mississippi River is EXTREMELY powerful -- dangerous currents, etc N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. i believe some of them are
underneath some of the 'roadway' that collapsed into the water, and others in the tangled web of steel that used to be the 'arch' that supported the road bed. Also, the current is supposedly pretty strong even with the lock closed?- Those cars down river from the bridge remains were being battered by debris that was being washed down with the current is what i have heard.

It's frustrating to watch from a distance, and see what seems like so little really being done, but i do believe they are trying hard to get through this as quickly and safely as possible.

dragging cars through the mud and across the riverbed might rip them apart, and as crass as this sounds, ruin the hope that families hold of knowing for certian what has become of their loved one(s).


:shrug: what a terrible mess this world is...

peace,
blu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Where ya gonna park the crane?
The river is pretty swift-they're trying to reduce the flow but that takes a while-and if the river is flowing at six mph and it takes ten minutes for a vehicle to sink through the sixty foot depth to the bottom-where it may roll over and over-that vehicle might well be a mile downriver.
The river is "black," meaning it's quite dirty and divers are virtually blind and going by "feel." The fall of the bridge stirs up debris which means it will be weeks before it even gets back to its normal, very dirty state. "Big Muddy" means something.

Using up divers in a six mile per hour current in what, right now, is the blindest river around, just isn't a good idea.

It's a cinch there's nobody underwater who's still alive. Do you search for bodies first and try to round up as many as possible, before they wash free and end up in New Orleans or deteriorated to the point that they are never recoverable? Each recovery of vehicle or body is an individual project.

Do you grab for vehicles and lose even more chances to recover remains so the living can perform a decent burial? What about the vehicles which are lying under twisted bridge?

This is an enormously complex undertaking and rushing into such a mess is too much like the republicans' simple minded solutions to bring on repuke utopia. The real world just doesn't work like that.

Fundamental tenet-it always takes longer and costs more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You are mostly right but the "normal state" of the Mississippi river up there
is -not- "very dirty"...it's nothing like it is 500 miles downstream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I stand corrected, thank you.
However, I just now heard from a diver on msnbc, one of the ones who've dived the wreckage, and he said the visibility was about six inches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes, right now it is because of all the disturbance.
I don't have an axe to grind here, just pointing out that the water in the MS river doesn't -normally- get nasty until quite a ways downstream. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. It is always murky there
Not just because of the disturbance.

We always used to joke that it the river was like flowing mud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Yeah, the Missouri river is very muddy and contributes a huge amount
plus five hundred miles of farm and backyard runoff cannot be helping matters much.
Don't worry, I wasn't suggesting that you were being overly argumentative.

I've done a bit of night and black water diving and even thirty years ago I was hard pressed to qualify and stay qualified for black water rescue.
My hat is off to those people; their dedication is phenomenal.
You don't blow off a meeting or a practice. At least the group I was affiliated with, here in Illinois, make it very plain. If you have a difficulty showing up, no matter what it is, you had better question your desires to work with such an organization.

They cannot use and do not want anyone who might put the operation or personnel in any undue peril. There's enough danger without that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. Upstream or downstream makes a big difference
Cars that fell off on the upstream side of the bridge were either completely or partially washed under the debris by the powerful currents the river has.

The son-in-law is a diver/rescue worker and members of his team have been flown up to help out. VERY dangerous work with a lot of broken re-bar sticking out all over, currents that shift every time a car or piece of concrete is moved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. My husband suggested one of those cranes with
a powerful magnet to pull the cars up out of the water. The kind they use where they crush cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Um. Those are electromagnets. Electricity + water. Not good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Great minds and all that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throwing Stones Donating Member (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. no one could have anticipated that water and electricity would cause a problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. It is not a problem with properly insulated wiring.
Electromagnets are routinely and safely used underwater every day...even in semi-conductive salt water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Aren't those electromagnets? Could be a problem.....eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. bzzzzt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimsterdemster Donating Member (237 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. is there some kind of...
floating crane barge,ship or something?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Sure, but it doesn't work so hot in rubble-filled water. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I saw one parked there earlier today. It didn't have anything on
it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. Maybe also out of respect for the dead victims' families?
There are most likely bodies still in those submerged cars...imagine having to explain to the families if they are given a body chopped into pieces by a crane. Plus the images of bodies potentially falling from the cars (as they are lifted by a crane) don't make for very good video and with all the news people up there it would be a hard thing to hide and/or explain.
Much like the 9/11 families not wanting their loved ones' remains scooped up and sent to the dumps w/ the Ground Zero debris.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
31. The roadbed is shifting and not in small enough pieces to pick up and move
The currents in the Mississippi River at that location are wicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC