Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deep Throat 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 01:55 PM
Original message
Deep Throat 2
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 01:57 PM by Buttercup McToots



sez we have to do this...

C. Talk to your friends in other states.
6. Discuss This Draft Indictment At State level
A. State Standing
Constitution guarantees to all States a Republican Form of government, which includes an enforcement mechanism.

B. Assertion of Retained State Power
States have power to do this: Amendment X reserves all non-delegated powers to the States. Congress was not delegated power to prosecute a President only impeach. States retain and may at any time assert this non-delegated, reserved power at any time without coordination with Congress. The intent of framers was for the States to act as one of the last vanguards of the Constitution against an abusive Government. The State prosecution is consistent with the Framers intent of preserving the Constitution, not, as this Congress and president have done, impersmissibly let the Constitution decay.
C. Allegations
President's conduct has denied the States of the Constitutionally Protected Guarantees: Refusal to enforce; failure to defend Constitution; illegal abrogation of Supreme Law and Geneva.
D. Charge
President has violated his oath of office to ensure the States enjoy a Republican Form of Government; and illegally abrogated war crimes.
E. Punishment, Remedy
The President and Vice President may be jailed; pending their release, the Speaker shall Assume Duties of President. President and VP shall retain title of "President' and "Vice President" but all legal duties and power shall be transferred to Pelosi and her Congressionally-approved Nominee, per 25th Amendment, by a simple majority vote in each house.
Make it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for a new thread, here's link to Deep Throat 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I want to hear John Dean's thoughts on this.
I have a feeling Olberman will be talking with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Me too...
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Listen to Dean - see if he repeats the best argument anyone has
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 03:12 PM by higher class
made - no matter how far the exercise of impeachment goes -

... an impeachment trial in the Senate means that they cannot hide (my word) - they must comply with testimony, documents, etc. We would learn the truth.

And Dean and others have told us - that running out of time before 2009 doesn't matter - there is no time limit on an mpeachment trial. And Dean and others have said - the declaration in the House does not have to take a lot of time. The Senate does the work.

The people of this country who were promised a Constitution, Bill of Rights, right to vote, balance of power, right to impeach MUST do this - we can't rely on our leaders to make the call.

We can't let corporate tv to get in our way. There are work arounds to Republican owned propaganda networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Back to Baker Botts...
Adam J. White

White working as counsel for an AT&T affiliated entity Baker Botts did release a questionable editorial about state secrets. It remains to be understood who within the Republican Party sent this e-mails requesting White write an editorial; or whether white issued information to mislead the public. Legal services used to advance illegal warfare are DC Bar Rule 1.16. A grand Jury could conclude that White and other legal counsel were part of efforts to provide misleading information to dissuade action to enforce Geneva and FISA against legal counsel, contractors, and others indirectly supporting the unlawful FISA violations and war crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting, but which states can make this happen?

California is governed by a moderate Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good un
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 04:04 PM by Buttercup McToots
Damn

Can't do any copy of this...But sure is interesting...Take a peek...
1 Enter at URL < http://mpuc.informe.org/easyfile/easyweb.php?func=easyweb_query >

2. At the second block, "Case ID" -- Enter this number < 2006274 >

The case file you are looking at is the backup information and messages related to the Maine Power Utility Lawsuit against Verizon. This relates to the recent ruling that the state AG's of Vermont, Maine, Missouri, and New Jersey can proceed with the litigation on re NSA at the _state_ level. Recall DoJ threatened to sue the state AGs to dissuade them from taking action, in re Honorable Vaughn R. Walker.

There are some important things to notice in the casefile: If you go through the records, as you have with the DOJ E-mail dumps you're going to see some interesting things.

* Disclosed Verizon E-mail Addresses Link To NSA, FISA Intermediaries

Recall, one of the problems has been the missing RNC e-mails. There's an answer to the missing holes. Inside the Maine PUC file for the Verizon, are their e-mail addresses for their internal e-mails. These were not supposed to have been disclosed; but one of the counsel's memoranda lists an e-mail for the internal system. To make a long story short, once you index the e-mails for the Verizon internal e-mail system, you can then use open source information to cross-index with the outside NSA-FISA intermediaries: One of them is AMDOCS. Within the Verizon e-mail is also open disclosure of the Verizon General Counsel request for and receipt of information related to specific legal questions related to various litigation issues of interest to the FISA-NSA surveillance.

In court, once something has been disclosed, that cannot be hidden.

At the bottom of page 3 I think...it sez

Verizon responses came not from Mr. Seidenberg but from Drew C. Arena, who in his response lists his Verizon title as VP & Associate General Counsel for Law Enforcement and National Secuirty Compliance. Follow-up questions to Mr. Arena's responses were again sent to Mr. Seidenberg, and again responses came from Mr. Arena: therewfore, subsequent questions were sent directly to Mr. Arena.

mmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I can't open the link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I can...
Maine Public Utilities...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday_Morning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. ooops
now I can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. 5/06...pdf...initial filing
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. From the initial filing
I see Mark Klein's name, whistleblower in the AT&T case. I remember there was discussion about him last year. I suppose all this is related to Verizon, but my brain is too full to absorb much more today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Ok
This is one of the key strands linking Verizon to the NARUS, AT&T, and the intermediaries between the commercial sector and the NSA. You'll notice many common names of conferences, review topics, and other material which closely matches what is in the Klein affidavit related to AT&T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ok I'm Scared...
Don't know if I should post anymore...
There is stuff there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockedthevoteinMA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. What stuff? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. What is this?
http://neustar.biz/infrastructure/fcs.cfm


Who We Are

fiducianet is a full-service outsourcing contractor for the management of a carrier's compliance with subpoenas and court orders, and all its obligations under lawful electronic surveillance law, including CALEA, USA PATRIOT Act, ECPA, T-III, and FISA. Our service offering includes:

Responsibility for Subpoenas and Court Orders

We provide outsourcing of your subpoena and court order review and processing. In your dealings with law enforcement agencies we are designated your Carrier Agent and accept service of legal process on your behalf. Our team will receive, review, and process any subpoenas, and review and provision court orders for intercepts you receive. We have attorneys and paralegals on our staff who have extensive telecommunications and law enforcement experience. They are experts in the proper procedures and performance required of you under the various laws governing your Lawful Electronic Surveillance requirements. Our Carrier Agent service allows you to focus on your day-to-day operations knowing that you are fully compliant with the law and do not risk providing too much or too little information when you receive legal process. Should the subpoena require intervention with law enforcement to clarify the request we do that for you as well.

Management of Call Data and Content

We utilize sophisticated Network Management software to securely access your switches' call detail records and subscriber information remotely. Our nationwide system has points of presence in a location close to you and can handle remote data and record collection, as well as ultimate delivery to the requesting agency. By using this sophisticated platform, fiducianet is able to fulfill your subpoena and technical assistance requests, providing the information directly to the requesting law enforcement agency (LEA) without you even getting involved or effecting the normal operation of your switches. As an added benefit we can also maintain a copy of your CDR’s and subscriber information in a secure off-site facility for a specified period of time. This makes retrieval for the LEA instantaneous, a great aid to law enforcement when time is precious. It also affords you an additional disaster recovery repository for valuable customer information.

Remote Switch Mediation and Provisioning

Our equipment vendor relationships and the use of our sophisticated Network Management system means fiducianet is able to provide switch adjunct support at a fraction of the price you will need to pay to purchase most mediation devices. Our system connects to multiple switches which relieves you of having to buy the adjunct platform yourself. If you have a switch requiring mediation (EWSD, AXE, GTD5, and others), and even if your switch doesn't require mediation, we connect your switch non-intrusively to our network which mitigates any requirement for installation of additional hardware to manage the potentially large capacity required by the LEA’s (and the FBI Final Notice of Capacity.) Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, we will handle the provisioning of the switch remotely to comply with court orders for Pen Register and Trap & Trace information. As part of our service we deliver that information to the LEA directly over our network. Our network configuration allows us to also remotely provision a Call Content Intercept (T-III & FISA) and deliver its content to the LEA directly from a single point-of-presence within your state or off your switch through a dial out connection to the LEA monitoring center.

Primary Point of Contact for Law Enforcement

In summary, we provide end-to-end Electronic Surveillance (ELSUR) compliance including subpoena and court order review and processing, provisioning of the intercepts and records storage. As your Carrier Agent we will also testify on your behalf as the "custodian" of your records. Additionally, we are officially designated your 24/7 point-of-contact for the LEA’s and will notify the FCC and the LEA’s of this fact on your behalf. As an added bonus, we are able to provide primary level fraud detection and fraud management at significantly lower cost than your having to buy the software yourself and build the personnel infrastructure in-house. As you become more familiar with the fiducianet system you can introduce fraud management into your network at a fraction of the cost of doing it yourself.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Someone has created a Digg on the mystery poster, dubs him/her "Deep Modem"
Just happened to stumble across it. It has a link to DU, but not to the original TPMmuckraker (although that link *is* here, of course).

If y'all think this should be widely disseminated, you can go here to Digg it:
http://digg.com/politics/Mystery_poster_Deep_Modem_spil...
(It's only got six Diggs at time of this posting.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Link doesn't work..
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The link worked, but the
information is not there - I got an "oops, the #(*& you are looking for is gone." (paraphrased of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
20. Sad to think that the spineless in
Congress mean that we now need to do things on the State level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC