Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for vets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JoDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:37 AM
Original message
Question for vets
Ok, here goes...I have never been in the military (turned down for medical reasons) and have fired a gun only once on a range in full daylight. Today's reports on the observation of the docs who examined Pat Tillman's body have led me to a question that I don't have the knowledge or experience to answer. I'm hoping that some of our DUers who have served can give their opinions.

Presume that the doctors' guess is correct (which, to be fair, is a leap, but just presume) and Tillman's skull was shattered by 3 bullets fired from approximately 10 yards away from his position.

Under the conditions at the scene (darkness, confusion and stress) would the average soldier be able to tell a friendly from an enemy at approximately 10 yards? It would seem to me that at that distance, even taking the lack of light into account, a soldier should be able to at least recognize the outline of a friendly in battle gear and this weapon, if not see them outright. However, as I said, I've never been there. Does anyone have any thoughts?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Here's another question--NO one had night vision gear? No one?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Gen. Wes Clark said last night on KO that it was dusk, not dark, and that
his outline was obvious (big football player), and his weapon outline would also be seen and recognized as an American weapon. I agree with the General who has served in the military for 40 years and feels it was highly suspicious. I am twice a vet and it sounds like assassination to me. Also, the tightness of the cluster of bullet wounds in his forehead suggest murder, not random shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, I wouldn't argue with Wes either on that score. And you're right--that's not random.
That brings us to yet another question: WHY???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. If it was murder, there are a couple reasons why
all of them sickening..I think you probably have a couple in mind yourself.

Everything this administration touches/has anything to do with turn to liquid shit or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. There is an article that obliquely infers that a "sniveler" may have whacked him
Here's the link. It doesn't come right out and say so, but it's sort of obliquely suggests it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070726/ap_on_re_us/tillman_friendly_fire;_ylt=AlGiIfbhJtGDTYu0n02oDM.s0NUE

Tillman's mother, Mary Tillman, who has long suggested that her son was deliberately killed by his comrades, said she is still looking for answers and looks forward to the congressional hearings next week....It has been widely reported by the AP and others that Spc. Bryan O'Neal, who was at Tillman's side as he was killed, told investigators that Tillman was waving his arms shouting "Cease fire, friendlies, I am Pat (expletive) Tillman, damn it!" again and again.

But the latest documents give a different account from a chaplain who debriefed the entire unit days after Tillman was killed.

The chaplain said that O'Neal told him he was hugging the ground at Tillman's side, "crying out to God, help us. And Tillman says to him, `Would you shut your (expletive) mouth? God's not going to help you; you need to do something for yourself, you sniveling ..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I would guess that the "sniveler" would be the last person to kill big and
strong and brave and protective Pat Tillman...who would cover his ass then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
29. Maybe the sniveller had a battle buddy, standing ten yards away? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The M-4 has a three round burst
In this mode, one squeeze of the trigger fires three rounds very quickly. That would explain the tightness of the shot group. Being an ex-Infantry officer, I've trained a lot of troops who would constantly get out of their "lane" and into friendly fire. I think suggesting this is murder and not an accident is a little exaggerated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. LOL! You're going to be fighting an uphill battle here with that kind of sound reasoning.
The conspiracy is building to monumental proportions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Again, I would urge you also to read the article I posted upthread.
I don't think that BushCo had the guy killed, but that fellah he was calling a "snivelling expletive" certainly had means, motive and opportunity to squeeze off a round at ten yards or less to dispatch his tormenter.

"Ooops, my finger slipped!!!"

There WAS a cover-up. We already know that. We're finding out it wasn't just a coverup of how he died, it may have been a coverup of a crime--a murder, or manslaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't know--I think if the guy next to him shot him, the wounds
(entry/exit) would have looked different, and there was a chaplain there too, right? It's really hard to prove that he was intentionally murdered or fragged (as opposed to accidental friendly fire) without being able to pinpoint the shooter. This may just go unsolved either because of the "fog of war" or because someone involved won't step forward. I do hate to see DUers suddenly try to pin the "murder" on BushCo because of the Chomsky revelation--this administration has a TON of enemies--Tillman was really not that big a fish, despite his fame. The real crime is still the cover-up, I believe, and the propaganda beforehand. Without new evidence, that's all we're left with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. His mother believes it was a fragging
It wouldn't surprise me if her sense is correct. After all, his brother was over there, he knew full well what the dynamic was between the deceased and his squad.

I'm not getting into the whole "Bush Sent An Assassin" nonsense. I don't believe that, frankly. Unit cohesion would immediately be disrupted by a stranger in their midst, and someone would talk about it. But I am completely able to envision ascenario where someone who wasn't quite as tough had reached his breaking point, or was angry at Tillman for calling his buddy a snivelling fucker, or what have you--and just .... squeezed.

Don't believe that all chaplains are paragons of virtue, either. They aren't. This guy's story is quite different from the one that was shopped--why didn't this chaplain pipe up, if he knew the real deal? Perhaps his CAREER--and the fact that he punched a battlefield ticket, good for at least two rungs on the promotion ladder--took precedence over his calling. You should see the shit some folks of the cloth pull around promotion selection board time--they go out of their way to dish dirt on their competition to the upper ranks who will sit on their promotion boards. Many of them are craven shits, frankly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I have never fired an M-4 and don't even know what it is really but
I have fired thousands of rounds through an M-16, M-60, and AK-47. I have never been able to have a tight group in full automatic mode. When I was a machine-gunner extreme accuracy was very important and I fired solid tracer rounds instead of four and one. We had to have the ability to suppress within a couple of meters of team on the ground. While I do know that friendly fire is indeed very common I find your explanation a little hard to agree with. I am not saying it was definitely not friendly fire but I think it is suspicious and an investigation is in order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. The M4 is essentially an M16 with a shorter barrel and folding/smaller stock
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 10:59 AM by DS1
which makes it better suited for close-combat and building-clearing, as well as probably a bit lighter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Definitely needs to be investigated
and I agree with you that the loud cries of "murder" are coming a little too soon. The (for now) anonymous doctors were not experienced homicide investigators or coroners. They simply noticed something in their examination that did not jibe with the story they had been told, and encouraged their superiors to launch an investigation. Remember also, the "10 yards" statement is just a guess on the doctors' part, and shouldn't be taken as gospel at this point.

The question here should be why, considering all the evidence, a probe was not started. Add to that the information that has been made public since Tillman's death (the destruction of his uniform, body armor and diary, his open disagreement with his mission, the light conditions at the time of his death, Bush asserting executive privilege on documents pertaining to the death, and Tillman verbally identifying himself) and a bleak picture does emerge.

But I must remember always that horrible, but honest, mistakes do happen in war. A friend who served in Vietnam once told me of a friendly fire incident in his platoon. During an engagement, another soldier heard a sound behind him--another platoon member making some noise. Without thinking, and in full daylight, the first turned around and opened fire. A tragic mistake, but still just a mistake.

Without a full and honest investigation, Tillman's family may never know what really happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I think an investigation should be conducted as well
I just don't immediately scream murder as so many are quick to do. Of course without so many knee-jerk comments, what would a blog be anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. His MOTHER thinks he was murdered. It only takes one squeeze of the trigger and a decent aim to do
that. I think you need to read the article I linked to that is posted upthread.

Some salient excerpts--the part about NO ENEMY FIRE is especially interesting, and curious:


.....the Pentagon did conduct a criminal investigation, and asked Tillman's comrades whether he was disliked by his men and whether they had any reason to believe he was deliberately killed. The Pentagon eventually ruled that Tillman's death at the hands of his comrades was a friendly-fire accident.

The medical examiners' suspicions were outlined in 2,300 pages of testimony released to the AP this week by the Defense Department in response to a Freedom of Information Act request.

Among other information contained in the documents:

    • In his last words moments before he was killed, Tillman snapped at a panicky comrade under fire to shut up and stop "sniveling."

    • Army attorneys sent each other congratulatory e-mails for keeping criminal investigators at bay as the Army conducted an internal friendly-fire investigation that resulted in administrative, or non-criminal, punishments.

    • The three-star general who kept the truth about Tillman's death from his family and the public told investigators some 70 times that he had a bad memory and couldn't recall details of his actions.

    No evidence at all of enemy fire was found at the scene — no one was hit by enemy fire, nor was any government equipment struck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not just murder
but execution! I have no doubt Gen Clark is absolutely correct. Plus as I understand it Ranger Tillman after realizing someone was firing on his position was shouting "I AM PAT FU***** TILLMAN", hear-able at an estimated 10 yards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. I remember reading that story, and foolishly believing it. It was before the brokenness of the
military was fully apparent. Turns out he never said that....at least according to the new story.

But hey, who really knows? I do have to say, his mother thinks something's not right. And his brother was over there... the brother certainly had a better view of the behavior of his unit before and after the events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Missed KO last night
and didn't hear Clark's opinion. I agree with him that it seems highly suspicious. But I don't what to jump to conclusions in my own mind with an uninformed opinion. While it certainly does sound a lot like assassination to me too, a part of me just doesn't want to make that leap. Then again, a part of me didn't want to believe that our soldiers would ever be sent to die in an illegal, unjust war. I had to let go of that particular set of rose-colored glasses. I may have to break this pair as well.

Thanks for your thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYVet Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. your thoughts
Your initial thoughts are correct, the Kevlar, LBE, and equiptment that soldiers wear is distinctive in low light and a hazy smoke.

I don't want to judge anyone thought, because I was not there when this happened, and when I was shot at in Somalia, I was running on a LOT of adrenaline and stress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'd presume that if you have time to sight on the forehead
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 10:05 AM by DS1
you have time to identify the person. If it was a quick reaction shot, training should lead to three bullets starting at the abdomen and working their way up.

UNLESS - of course, after yelling the famous phrase, he popped his head over a rock and that's the only part which was exposed.

Still, you think the shooter would eventually come out to the public
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Can they tell
which soldier was the shooter? I can't remember all the details of the official investigation right now, but I think that if everyone in the group was carrying the same weapon it might be difficult to tell exactly who was the shooter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. It's unlikely the bullets were recovered
they'd be likely shattered into little pieces, and then flung out in all different directions and buried in sand.

I meant more along the lines of the shooter coming out and saying he was the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiddenInVA Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. What would confession gain?
I really doubt that anybody is going to step forward at this point and confess to firing the killing
shots.

Maybe in the beginning, it would have been "Well, it was an accident", etc. But now, with the allegations
of a cover-up, it'd be prison time for the trigger puller, even if it was an accident. (I don't know
either way.)

So unless somebody has a serious case of 'attack of conscience', I wouldn't hold my breath. Messed up,
but the truth.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Now, it's the coverup
and not the possible crime that may matter. If military officials had said from the beginning that it was friendly fire and an awful mistake, the story would have died right there. The man who pulled the trigger would have faced limited reprecussions, if any. But now, since it is likely that the shooter took some small role in the cover up he would face legal problems. Not to mention the general hatred of the nation. So they have no incentive to come forward, except the aforementioned attack of conscience.

Instead, Pat Tillman and his family were used, for a cause Tillman himself expressed doubts in.

Now, we may have to start asking ourselves another disturbing question: if the Army was willing to lie about Tillman's death for propaganda reasons, what else might they be lying about?

Thanks to all the vets and folks experienced with firearms who have taken the time to answer my original post. Ya'all have given this hound a lot to think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnExtremist Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think the question more important than the evidence, per say
Would be, what would the motive be? Was he worth more dead or alive, and to who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. A very plausible motive...
...would be that this high-profile hero, who had put his lucrative football career on hold to fight in Afghanistan, was outspoken about his opposition to the illegal invasion of Iraq, and had plans to meet with Noam Chomsky on his next leave -- possibly planning to go public with his own negative opinions on the war in Iraq.

I'm not saying I know whether it was or was not a murder (or assassination). I'm just saying, there is a very understandable motive for it -- especially considering the coverup -- they not only tried to cover it up using the usual bureaucratic methods, they also burned his uniform and his diary. That smacks of something more than just a coverup about an accident... IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. the doctors said it was suspicious and the big brass told them to shut up...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC