argh...Joan Walsh and Dan Abrams are missing the whole point

[MonkeyFunk]

in their argument with Tucker Carlson.

Carlson argues that private sexual matters should always be that way, and Abrams and Walsh are hypocrites for attacking Vitter.

Tucker;

Dan Abrams and Joan Walsh are NOT THE GOVERNMENT! They're not trying to legislate their beliefs. Vitter IS the fucing government, and he wanted to use the power of law to impose his beliefs on others!

[eleny]

1. Dan Abrams made that point

that Vitter is the government etc.

[malaise]

4. True but the point about making laws to

enforce his views on others is a valid one.

[eleny]

5. Yes, it sure as hell is

Dan and Joan got it and tried to make that very point over Tucker's filibustering.

[napi21]

2. Don't pick on Dan! He DID say Vitters had family values and

morals as HIS platform, and if he's a Senator and breaches the things He fights against all the time, he deserves to be exposed and attacked for it! Joan was a lot milder, but I think she got her point across too.

[Evergreen Emerald]

3. Really? Vitters did not think so when Clinton's private consensual

sexual stupidity was exposed. Where was Tucker then?

[eleny]

6. Tucker joined the repuke chorus

[Exultant Democracy]

7. picking out bowties?

[C_U_L8R]

8. We're paying for the repunk's hookers

and his friggin' diapers too.

Tucker has no problem with that ??!!!
Well geez Tuck, didn't know that was your style.
I guess we all should've seen the bowtie
as a desperate cry for ... a change.

[MonkeyFunk]

9. No we're not

he visited the DC hookers before he was a Senator. The diaper thing is just a lame rumor.

[C_U_L8R]

11. oh ok

[radfringe]

10. I want a bumper sticker that says

You don't tell me how to pray,
and I won't call you a hypocrite