Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CLG has received 'DC Madam' phone records - preparing list for release

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:20 AM
Original message
CLG has received 'DC Madam' phone records - preparing list for release
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 11:22 AM by rec_report
Breaking: Citizens For Legitimate Government has received 'DC Madam' phone record and is preparing list for release. --Lori Price, CLG, 11:57 EDT 09 Jul 2007
I'll post the link here as soon as it's available.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. so what will you be releasing? The full log of phone numbers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Getting my popcorn ready-thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Where is the little popcorn guy? :) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Here!
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Wow, I got three - thanks! :)
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Butter?
:popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. oh my!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. You are such a tease. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. We'll be waiting
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. get thee to the Greatest Page ASAP n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. The old adage
what's good for the goose is good for the gander was never more true. If Madam is in the hot seat, a bunch of ganders need to be also.
POPCORN TIME!!!!!!:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :applause: :applause: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Any sense of when the list will be released? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. separate the list into smaller sections and throw a DU research party
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 11:30 AM by GloriaSmith
This is going to be fun :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ahahahahah! Hey, what IF some politician we LIKE is on it?
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Gotta take the good with the bad.
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 11:34 AM by jojo54
edited to add: I would rather see a name of someone I like on this list, than to have all the other assholes (especially repukes) still in hiding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. if there are, then I'm sure fox will tell us all about it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Fox will also report the Rs as Ds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. but if they can't, they'll default back to the evils of CLENIS
I can hear it now...

"I don't see why the liberal left is so worked up over a few of the GOP presidential candidates engaging in consensual group massage related activities with Delilah the Dominatrix when they clearly ignore the fact that Clinton raped a 21 year old child in the sacred oval office."

Nope. The only way fox will beat up any republican johns is if they discover the whores were illegal immigrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian_rd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. They'll say Clinton encouraged this behaviour and therefore the Republican
... johns are no more to blame than the Clenis. They pulled it with Abu Ghraib, they'll pull it with this too. Remember they also blamed "liberalism" in general for Mark Foley's transgressions with the young congressional aides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. We won't like them anymore. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. The difference between D and R is the hypocrisy.
That's the difference. When a Republican spends his entire career shouting famly values and claiming he's a moral Christian, I think he's a worse sinner than the Dem who concedes that everyone's capable of human failings.

Holier than thou Republicans are the fairest of the fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. It would be hypocritical behavior for either side.
You can't pretend to be fighting for human rights while taking part in a system of buying access to women's bodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. I am only interested in the hypocrites, regardless of party affiliation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. You take the good, you take the bad ...
You take 'em both and there you have the facts of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. If it's 1000 Republicans on the list and 1 Democrat
the media will be justified in calling it a bipartisan scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, Happy day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. Woohoo Lori Price! Get busy!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
20. Tidbit (maybe obvious) but there are tons of numbers from...
Washington DC, Annapolis, Alexandria (from a 2005 phone records page).
I realize that's not any shocker, but it may be a 'popcorn-worthy' tidbit!
:) --Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
23. I'm curious as to why CLG got the list first...
Or have a bunch of different enterprises received the list simultaneously, and CLG is just the first to report it? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. I don't know... but I do have it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. they did not... they simply did not have enough ethics
to live up to their agreement with the source. see my threads here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=1285281&mesg_id=1288731

there are a small group that the list was released to and we had to agree to the conditions of the source. that is why you have not seen it out yet, because people with integrity are going through it and taking out the private citizens on that list as well as family members of the source, and per the agreement, also her employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. And the most popular excuse for being on the list will be....?
"One of my staffers used my phone."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Giant Robot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Liberal media smear job
No wait....Clinton did it.

No, no, no, no I have a drug and or alcohol problem and will be entering rehab after this press conference.

Er, um, I was fondled by a priest as a kid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. "One of my staffers used my phone" won't be an excuse
if there are eyewitnesses to their actually showing up for services. :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
32. If Cheney's on it, I swear I'll get religion.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. I wonder if hypocritical Reichwing whackjob Joe LieberBush...
is on the list?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Eeeeeeee-yooooo. Not enough money in the world for that one.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
34. I hope there are juicy details...
...I'd love to hear Cheney explain why there is a record of him
ordering the "Darth Vader and Ewok Fantasy Romp on Tantooine" from this
call-girl service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Should be fun. I love to watch hypocrites squirm.
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pokey Anderson Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
38. Okay, a research question...
People change cell phones what, every year-and-a-half or two years?

If these are cell phone numbers, how easy is it to track down the owner's name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. Excuse me, but I read the whole agreement on her website.
You're not to release the entire list. It specifically prohibits that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I (and CLG's lawyer) are complying with the terms of release...
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 01:14 PM by rec_report
When I said 'list,' of course, I am cognizant of the restrictions.
:eyes:
Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #41
50. um... yup, sure...
i am sure Mr. Sibley will agree with that. posting the name of an employee and her mother is really good work there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. i have been saying this for three threads now...
the only reason the info has not come out from others who got the list is that we are carefully removing private citizens from the list and only focusing on the public figures... which given 13 years of business and her own statement that maybe 20 are public officials... would pretty much make a lot of private citizens part of a sex scandal as well as her own employees.

this is so damn unethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. The only names I will care about are the HYPOCRITES, not the mere
philanderers.

We will need to google for morality and uberchristian quotes from everybody on the list. Those who spew family values from their lips and then go off to a madam are our only targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. I would/am only releasing the names of any public figures/officials
--the 'Reichwing hypocrites.'
The other names/numbers are not relevant.
Polar Bear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. are you on crack?
you have put up the full list, all the numbers, including madame's mothers number... once people start looking up those numbers, they will have the names. this is why we had to agree to the terms. or did you think this thing called Internet would simply cloak everyone but the hypocrites and leave all the private citizens covered by a magical cloak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
44. Info on the release agreement from the DC madam's Website
Escort Service Telephone Release Agreement

Having now obtained permission to release the telephone records of the Escort Service for the entire history of its operation, Jeane is prepared to release without cost those records on the following terms:

1. Any (i) American media,press outlet or published blogger, (ii) registered or incorporated public service organization or charity, (iii) licenced private investigator, (iv) attorney or (v) data analyst/cryptographer is eligible to receive without cost a copy of the telephone records in CD-Rom format.

2. All recipients will receive a complete set of years 1993 to 2006. There will be no partial distribution and there will be no exclusivity.

3. All recipients will abide by an agreement NOT to disclose the identity of any woman, who worked as an independant contractor of my former business, Pamela Martin and Associates, without that woman’s permission.

4. Furthermore, all recipients will agree as well NOT to publish the information online or in any way whatever, share/trade and/or sell the data to third parties. This of course does not preclude publishing the data specific to a particular individual of note. Each copy of the data provided will be coded so that if the data is released in bulk the identitiy of the source will be possible.

5. All recipients’ anonymity will be respected and they alone will divulge their identities only at a time, place and/or forum of their choosing.

6. Any interested party should contact Montgomery Sibley with an email acknowledging acquiescence to these conditions and to arrange delivery of the records

http://www.deborahjeanepalfrey.com/Jeane9a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rec_report Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. 'DC Madam' Phone Records posted (22-Jan to 22-Aug 2006)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. BE is her mother... what are you smoking!!!
why did you do that? or for christ sake. she specifically asked that her employees and private citizens be protected. another name on that list is in violation very specifically to her agreement... and two of them are large business companies, not people... so let's hope that the guys at those companies are NOT private citizens or they may have just lost their jobs too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC