Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think Fox News has just admitted that they're not Fair and Balanced.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:04 PM
Original message
I think Fox News has just admitted that they're not Fair and Balanced.
If they were Fair and Balanced, then they would be a model for the Fairness Doctrine. But instead, they're taking a position against the Fairness Doctrine, claiming that it infringes on Free Speech, and of course, ratings and profit:

Fox News: 'Fairness Doctrine' no match for ratings and money

"This next one may make you think twice about freedom of speech," announced Fox News on Wednesday, stating that the federal government wants to "resurrect" the Fairness Doctrine from "back in the 40's." The Fairness Doctrine, which required broadcasters to present both sides of controversial issues, was federal policy from 1949 until 1987.

<erm, if Fox News WERE presenting both sides of controversial issues, they wouldn't be impacted by the Doctrine, would they?>.

<snip>

Lowry, who dominated the discussion, began by saying, "The market is working here. You have extremely talented conservative talk radio show hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. And they're on the air because they get ratings. And broadcasters, guess what, they care about ratings because they want money."

<the cat is out of the bag. It's all about the money, not about presenting both sides of a story.>

"Radio outlets are supposed to operate in the public interest," objected Hill, citing the need for diversity of opinion.

"There is a diversity of opinion out there," insisted Lowry, pointing to PBS and shock jocks as counterbalances to conservatives like Limbaugh. "If you want liberal opinion in the media, you can get it in the newspapers."

- - - - -
So, what he's really saying is, if you want to hear the liberal side, don't expect to find it on Fox News.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Fox_slams_Fairness_Doctrine_in_favor_0627.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tortured "logic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Several "left wing" shows beat Hannity head-to-head
so saying that it is just about ratings is BS. It isn't about ratings anymore than underproducing hybrids or NOT producing electric cars and overproducing SUV's has anything to do with market economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So they've shown they have two Achille's Heels.
Edited on Wed Jun-27-07 12:26 PM by The Backlash Cometh
First, by their own admission, they're not Fair and Balanced because they favor right-wing positions over liberal ones due to the ratings; and second, their premise can be challenged because there are liberal programs that are beating right-wing pundits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hey FAUX
if you had an actual news cast I might unblock your channel and boost your ratings:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Even if they had actual news, I wouldn't--until they toss O'Loofah.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-27-07 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. The best thing to do is to simply ignore them!
Fox who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC