Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McClatchy: Nuclear weapons treaties: No nukes is good nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 06:53 PM
Original message
McClatchy: Nuclear weapons treaties: No nukes is good nukes
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/17346.html

Nuclear weapons treaties: No nukes is good nukes
By Jonathan S. Landay | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — Breaking with its closest ally, Britain Monday called on the United States to help renew a drive for global nuclear disarmament by joining Russia in reducing the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals lower than the Bush administration says it can go.

British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said the United States also should ratify a global ban on underground nuclear testing and agree with Russia to extend the verification measures the two countries use to monitor each other's arsenals beyond a December 2009 expiration date, steps the Bush administration opposes.

"What we need is both vision — a scenario for a world free of nuclear weapons — and action — progressive steps to reduce warhead numbers and to limit the role of nuclear weapons in security policy," said Beckett.

Her speech to an international arms control conference a stone's throw from the White House appeared to signal that incoming British Prime Minister Gordon Brown will not provide President Bush with the same lock-step support that cost his predecessor, Tony Blair, so much popularity.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-25-07 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. A good place to start is in the Middle East. It would help US negotioation position if it supported
a nuclear-free middle east, instead of turning a blind eye to Israel's nukes and then insisting, under military threat, to halt Iran's nuclear program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC