EVER THE ENABLER OF CRIMINALS-Gonzales Helped VP In Claim He Is Above The Law (Newsweek)

[kpete]

Ever the enabler of criminals and dangerous men, Alberto Gonzales has apparently been helping VP Cheney sustain his claim that he's not part of the executive branch.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/014796.php

July 2-9, 2007 issue - A new battle has erupted over Vice President Dick Cheney's refusal to submit to an executive order requiring a government review of his handling of classified documents. But the dispute could also raise questions for embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. For the past four years, Cheney's office has failed to comply with an executive order requiring all federal offices—including those in the White House—to annually report to the National Archives on how they safeguard classified documents. Cheney's hard-line chief of staff, David Addington, has made the novel argument that the veep doesn't have to comply on the ground that, because the vice president also serves as president of the Senate, his office is not really part of the executive branch

..................

Cheney's position so frustrated J. William Leonard, the chief of the Archives' Information Security Oversight Office, which enforces the order, that he complained in January to Gonzales. In a letter, Leonard wrote that Cheney's position was inconsistent with the "plain text reading" of the executive order and asked the attorney general for an official ruling. But Gonzales never responded, thereby permitting Cheney to continue blocking Leonard from conducting even a routine inspection of how the veep's office was handling classified documents, according to correspondence released by House Government Reform Committee chair Rep. Henry Waxman.

Why didn't Gonzales act on Leonard's request? His aides assured reporters that Leonard's letter has been "under review" for the past five months—by Justice's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). But on June 4, an OLC lawyer denied a Freedom of Information Act request about the Cheney dispute asserting that OLC had "no documents" on the matter, according to a copy of the letter obtained by NEWSWEEK. Steve Aftergood, the Federation of American Scientists researcher who filed the request, said he found the denial letter "puzzling and inexplicable"—especially since Leonard had copied OLC chief Steve Bradbury on his original letter to Gonzales. The FOIA response has piqued the interest of congressional investigators, who note Bradbury is the same official in charge of vetting all document requests from Congress about the U.S. attorneys flap. Asked about the apparent discrepancy, Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the OLC response "was and remains accurate" because Leonard's letter had generated no "substantive work product."



.............

Waxman told NEWSWEEK he now plans to investigate the handling of the issue by Justice as well as Cheney's refusal to comply with the executive order, which he called part of a "pattern" of stonewalling by the veep. Cheney spokeswoman Lea Anne McBride said, "We're confident we are conducting the office properly under the law." She also pointed to comments by White House Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino, who said that Bush, not the National Archives, was the "sole enforcer" of the executive order relating to classified information.

—Michael Isikoff


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19391241/site/newsweek/

[Solly Mack]

1. sotto voce

(surprise)

[BootinUp]

2. Bush is the "sole enforcer" pretty close to

Bush is the Law, don't you think?

Okey dokey.

[ThomWV]

3. He writes his own law, he ignores his own law, there is no law.

[rodeodance]

7. its that kingy thing again

[ixion]

4. if he is in the legislative branch, the 'executive' privilege doesn't come into play

hence, he should be coughing up both the security documents in question, as well as those notes from the energy task force. :evilgrin:

[fightthegoodfightnow]

5. OBSTRUCTIONISM & CONTEMPT FOR THE CONSTITUTION THAT EXCEDES

..........that of Richard Nixon.


It's time for impeachment.

[ananda]

6. What happens when criminals run both the country and the justice system?

You get no law for the criminals, and micro control of everyone and everything else.

God I hate fascism.

Sue

[JAYJDF]

8. It's apparent that the DOJ can not remain under the Executive

Branch.

Talk about seperation of powers.

Where should they be?