Michael Savage vs. Brian Lamb.

[Swede]

Sounds like the unlikeliest of media showdowns, right?

Well, it's happening right now, it's bloody, and Lamb is winning.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0607/4576.html

[CabalPowered]

1. YouTube video here of Lamb's last response

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=34818&mesg_id=34818

[blogslut]

3. That was so elegant

Lamb didn't crack a grin or wink once. He just quietly eviscerated Savage's minions as filler between phone calls. It was beautiful.

[seemslikeadream]

2. how are you listening to it

I can't find the link

[blogslut]

4. It happened a couple of days ago.

Once again, "The Politico" gets the story wrong.

I watched it via Crooks and Liars.com: http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/06/19/savages-assault-cspan/

[seemslikeadream]

6. Thanks blogslut

:hi:

[MiniMe]

5. Lamb might be reading more letters tomororow

from the article:

/snip

Lamb said Wednesday that he continues to receive hate mail from Savage supporters and is considering doing another show about the fight this Friday.

Wonder what else they have called him besides dickhead?

[Forkboy]

7. I only watched it once,but didn't Lamb say they didn't even have cameras there at one point?

First, some quick background. Talkers magazine recently awarded Savage -- a radio host whose talk show I enjoy -- a Freedom of Speech award. Savage did not pick up the award in person at a gathering in New York. Instead, he sent a speech on DVD. C-SPAN cameras were at the conference and covered parts of it but not the taped Savage speech.

I'm just wondering because it wont surprise me if Politico can't even get it right when they're getting it right. :)