Bush's SCOTUS turns out to be very "business friendly." SURPRISE!

[Atman]

High Court Rulings Reflect A Tilt In Favor Of Business

June 21, 2007
By DAVID G. SAVAGE, Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration and corporate lobbyists long have sought sweeping "tort reform" to limit lawsuits and massive jury awards - without much success. But in the past year, they quietly have been winning much of what they've wanted on a case-by-case basis in the Supreme Court.

With a week to go in their term, the justices have handed down a dozen rulings that sharply limit the damages that can be won in lawsuits or make it harder to sue corporations.

"The Roberts court is even better for business" than the court led for two decades by the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, said Washington lawyer Maureen E. Mahoney, who is a longtime friend of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and a former clerk for Rehnquist. "There is unquestionably a greater number of business cases before the court, and are quite willing to limit damage remedies:"

In February, the court threw out an $80 million punitive damages verdict against cigarette maker Philip Morris, ruling that juries cannot use a single victim's suit to punish a company for harm done by its products to thousands of others.

Last month, in a similar decision, the court set aside a California jury's $55 million verdict against Ford Motor Co. arising from a rollover accident involving its Ford Explorer.

Two weeks ago, the court shielded the insurance industry from paying millions of dollars in damages for not notifying customers when they check their credit ratings.

A few days before that, the court protected employers from being sued over pay discrimination against women and minorities that occurred in past years.

<snip>

http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/hc-scotus0621.artjun21,0,3834739.story?coll=hc-headlines-nationworld