Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is"Gitmo" Cuba's or the US's?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 11:59 AM
Original message
Is"Gitmo" Cuba's or the US's?
I am getting confused

First Gitmo was a US military base
Then it was "outside the US" so our laws didn't effect how/what we do to detainees there military rules/laws do

NOW Gitmo is "in Cuba" when Michael Moore dares film it to make a point.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny how they tried to paint Moore as a castro lover.
When he was at Gitmo with 9/11 rescue workers demanding they get the same health-care al-quaeda gets.. LOL

Moore is a genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Title is held by the Cuban government
The US holds a leasehold, which is an interest in property but obvious not as good as fee simple.

So, Gitmo is Cuba.

About the lack of jurisdiction? I think that is a seperation of powers thingy that I don't understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Interesting. I thought it was like our Gibralter.
You're right. Cuba retains sovereignty of Guantanamo, but signed over permanent leasing rights in 1903 and 1934 (under the second treaty the US agreed to pay Cuba about $4000 year for use of the port and coaling station). Castro lacks the right to renegotiate or cancel the contract.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. all of the above.
The US leases it from Cuba.

The Unitary Executive Pro-torture legal staff of the Presinut calls it like they want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Cuba doesn't recognize it, though.
They've been sending back the rent checks for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. My understanding is that Castro keeps the checks but doesn't cash them
Though it's basically the same idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. He should auction them off on Ebay. He'd make literally *thousands* of dollars!
Thereby making him the richest Cuban citizen.
,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. The do recognize that we are there and have never tried to oust us
I wonder why they have never brought a their case to the World Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's a Nazi concentration camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. That is so naive
It's an American concentration camp. :salute:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Cuba considers the U.S. in Guantánamo to be illegal occupation"
The current Cuban government considers the U.S. presence in Guantánamo to be an illegal occupation of the area, and argues that the Cuban-American Treaty, which established the lease in 1903, now violates article 52 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gitmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. The US "occupy"?!? Oh, stop that!!
wow... that's terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Right! We're not occupiers. The Guantanameros greet us as liberators.
But will they steal our watches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. It belongs to the US until they leave
In February 1903, the United States leased 45 square miles of land and water at Guantanamo Bay for use as a coaling (fueling) station. The treaty was finalized and the document was ratified by both governments and signed in Havana in December of that same year.



A 1934 treaty reaffirming the lease granted Cuba and her trading partners free access through the bay, modified the lease payment from $2,000 in gold coins per year, to the 1934 equivalent value of $4,085 U.S. Treasury dollars, and added a requirement that termination of the lease requires the consent of both the U.S. and Cuba governments, or the abandonment of the base property by the U.S.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's Cuban territory, however, we have some kind of air tight lease
on it of some sort maybe by some treaty. I'm not sure what. I think it goes back to the Spanish/American war. It could be just that Castro wouldn't dare throw us out without risking an invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formerrepuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. We pay "rent" to the Cuban government.. about $4,000.00 per year..
which the Cubans (understandably) never accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Well, they better realize those uncashed checks are void after 90 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's Cuban soil occupied by the US military.
Much like Hong Kong was occupied by the British, but instead of a thriving city, there's a concentration camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well I think moron* is a cuba loving freak anyway, he* continues
paying cuba rent for that area. I think he* should be impeached over that alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. If We are Leasing it from Cuba, Then Aren't We Violating the Embargo?
How is that we can lease a military base, but we cannot film there?

Please explain that to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-12-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Whoopsie! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC