Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interview w/Helen Thomas on How Bush Compares to Other Presidents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 06:39 AM
Original message
Interview w/Helen Thomas on How Bush Compares to Other Presidents
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/23075

Helen Thomas on How Bush Compares to Other Presidents
Submitted by davidswanson on Wed, 2007-05-30 02:15. Media

By Radio New Zealand National, via Scoop

snip//

Welcome to the programme.

Helen Thomas:
Thank you

Kathryn Ryan:
Can we start with this latest president, and do you know--I haven't toted them up--how many would it be? Do you know off the top of your head?

Helen Thomas:
Nine.

Kathryn Ryan:
Nine. This ninth and latest president that you've covered, George W. Bush, an administration which pretty much cold-shouldered you and a president who you reportedly described--perhaps not realising it would be reported--as the worst in American history. Was that your honest assessment of this presidency?

Helen Thomas:
That was my early assessment and it remains.

Kathryn Ryan:
Why?

Helen Thomas:
Why? Because I think that I cannot think of one redeeming feature. I think anyone who would want war and deliberately take this country into war under falsehoods cannot exactly be put on a pedestal. I want our leaders to understand where they are, what they're doing, and have some sense of humanity. I mean, we have been disgraced by torture. We've been disgraced by everything that has been tied to this war. We've killed thousands of innocent people. Bombed them. And to this moment, the leaders cannot explain why. One motivating reason--the only reason to go to war--is when you are attacked. That's under international law. So we're illegal and immoral and unconscionable.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why can't we have more journalists like Helen?
Are the corporate interests stifling and weeding out all but journalistic hacks who are willing to print what their masters decree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You know they are, with very few exceptions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC