Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Isn't Whole Point Being Pres Control House & Senate To Man Up & Make These Tough Decisions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
SLSmith Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 01:41 PM
Original message
Isn't Whole Point Being Pres Control House & Senate To Man Up & Make These Tough Decisions
 
Run time: 01:15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_rJYOwA19g
 
Posted on YouTube: February 01, 2010
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: February 01, 2010
By DU Member: SLSmith
Views on DU: 802
 
Jake Tapper ABC with Robert Gibbs - 2011 Fiscal Budget

In another attempt to rein in the deficit, Obama plans to create a commission by executive order that would make recommendations on how to reduce the deficit. The commission would make its recommendations after the November congressional elections and before the end of the year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perfect Question, SHIT ANSWER!
We are being punk'd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onpatrol98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL
Yep...I always hated that whole....boo, hoo, hoo...the republicans won't let us do it. That was a bunch of cover. I was royally shocked that people actually bought that. We had the White House, Senate (60 votes), and the Congress. Give me a break. A republican isn't even a speed bump with those numbers.

I feel like we allowed them to "punk" us, while we were weeping about "the party of No" and "obstructionists" republicans. Talk about throwing a rock and hiding your hand. It was like the twilight zone. Weird. Almost like they were afraid of all the power, and need republicans to hold their hands or share the blame if things went wrong. I just don't understand why our democratic leaders didn't want to do the things they said they were going to do. Maybe it was the blue dog...progressive thing, but, it wasn't republicans. Republicans didn't have enough power to tie their own shoes, until Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I have said this since Nov 2008...
We never had a 60 seat majority in the Senate! Forget Lieberman you several Democratic Senators who are Republican Lite, at best...They are Democrats in name only.

There is no power Obama or the DNC could hold over them because you can't run Liberals against them they would lose!

The Republicans knew this going in and so did Obama...This is why single payer was never even considered and why a "strong" Public Option was never going to make it either.

It has nothing to do with Dems not using their power and everything to do with many of us thinking we had power we really don't!

The Republicans have forever changed the Senate...Now 60 votes will be the norm for everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-01-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It took the Powers that Be (And I include some Top Dem Names in that group)
Thirty years to have the Media become complicit mainly with the programs for the Powers that Be. Iam glad to say Jake asking a hard question. Sorry he is getting a "soft" answer from Gibbs.

but this type of question is the exception.

Walter Cronkite would have asked us to ask hard questions about the necessity of having 60 votes for any bills to be passed. So would Ed Murrow.

Those two would have torn apart Bernanke's statements to "Sixty Minutes" that Bernanke's digitized money policies would never affect tax payers...

They would have parsed both Candidate Obama and President Obama's statements that "Single Payer Universal Health Care is the best and most logical solution to the Health Care Crisis problem - IF YOU ARE STARTING FROM SCRATCH. But since we have a system in place, we must work within that system, and come up with a solution that is uniquely American."

Say what, Obama? Our health care system is in crisis and we need reform, but we have to insist that it is a style of reform that will not upset any of the Big Players in that system?

Where did that type of logic (or illogic) descend on you? (or did it come about when you carefully reviewed the hundreds of millions you received from the Big Medical Interests, including the Big Insurers?)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC