Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There's Probably No God! - Richard Dawkins, Ariane Sherine, And The Atheist Bus Ad Campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:28 PM
Original message
There's Probably No God! - Richard Dawkins, Ariane Sherine, And The Atheist Bus Ad Campaign
 
Run time: 02:04
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSrSwRpBdHk
 
Posted on YouTube: January 08, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: January 26, 2009
By DU Member: ProfessorPlum
Views on DU: 1426
 
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Trouble with this is that they are discussing only one God concept
and there are many God concepts out there. Take the Lakota Way--all things are sacred, all part of the Great Mystery, which cannot ever be fully known and understood. Take many of the mystical paths of various faiths, which look at God as not separate but rather intimately close. Or simply look at my sig line, which to my mind says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If God is everything or nothing, than what good is he/she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Does It have to be good?
Or bad? Are atoms good or bad? Or do they merely exist? Isn't "goodness" and "badness" a judgment call?

Now personally, I'm glad there are atoms, because they appear to make up everything, and follow certain laws which appear to be the reason the universe works the way it does. In fact, I appreciate those atoms and those laws of science. To my mind, it is rather wonderful--and a part of It.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. well fine - then your word for "matter" is "god"
I can live with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I like what you're saying.
I guess if I absolutely *HAD* to label myself, it would be as a Pantheist, as I do feel that all life is sacred.

Not to pick on just the Christian religion, but since I've had it shoved down my throat all of my life, I'd like to think that one day, REALLY, REALLY soon, the bullshit lies will be exposed so that the truth truly can set us free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. They're using the one most of their audience will know.
The word "god" means something and while that definition may be different among religions there are some characteristics it must have to be god. Usually, gods create the universe, are not bound by its rules, but may intervene in that universe at will. They typically care about how people live their lives often to the point of responding to prayers. As the definition gets vaguer than that and less active in the real world, at somepoint we have to conceed that whatever else this supernatural being is, he is not god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not my god concept
nor the god concepts of millions of people. There was, historically, a whole movement within Christianity that viewed God as "the clockmaker"--He created the world, and then left it and is not active in it now. Your statement "...supernatural being is, he is not god" seems to be saying that God can only be defined in one way--and my point is that God can be defined in a multitude of ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. God can be defined in a multitude of ways.
So can "salad".


But we all know that to be a god, it must be supernatural. That, in my book, makes it a fairy tale, no matter how else you define god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. A Lakota spiritual advisor would disagree with you
There is nothing in the definition of "god" that says "god" has to be anything but VERY natural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. That is deism and has little to do with Christianity.
Deism is a rejection of the Christian god in favor of a minimalist creator that wound the clock and did little else. It was an attempt to explain the mechanical universe as it was understood in the 18th century while still being perplexed at how it all got started. This is not a god most believers would recognize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IGotAName Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. That's the one I recognize. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. That's your perogative, of course.
And it makes a lot more sense from an observational point of view than an interventionist god does.

I wonder what your feelings are about the suggestion that a purposeful creator only compounds the problem of existence rather than solving it. What I mean is if existence is hard to explain because it is so unlikely, then a god complex enough to cause a universe is a lot more unlikely. A god capable of creating a universe must be complex because what he is building is so. So doesn't that just raise the question of who or what made god? :shrug:

Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Not to mention...
...if you watch the video, the whole thing is a response to "Jesus died for your sins" stuff. That's the god they are reacting to, not Baal, y'know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IGotAName Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. Seriously- what the fuck does Jesus have to do with God? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh, it's good that he's made the necessary calculations. No-one else has been
Edited on Mon Jan-26-09 03:55 PM by Joe Chi Minh
able to up to now. I bet he did it on the back of a cigarette packet. He's that smart. A Nobel Prize surely awaits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Your sig line...
I've seen that quote attributed to Lily Tomlin:

http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/l/lilytomlin383212.html
No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up.
Lily Tomlin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Jane Wagner is Lily's life partner
and I believe she wrote the line . . . which Lily delivered on stage.

So, attribution to either of them is appropriate, and I like to give people behind the scenes credit! :)

I love Lily, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. oooh.
Didn't know. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. It was stated in the presence of a friend
who took a tour of India about 20 years ago. A group of Sufis had an audience with the Dalai Lama, who immediately started talking to them about how to fine tune their Sufi practices. My friend asked, "Why aren't you telling us about Buddhism?" His Holiness answered, "You are Sufis; you need to learn Sui practices." My friend then asked, "What's the difference between Sufism and Buddhism?" and His Holiness replied with the answer given in my sig line. Who knows? Maybe he got it from Lily Tomlin. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. That girl at the beginning is unbelievably beautiful. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'd probably agree that there's probably no "supernatural" God.
...no magical God that somehow defies the laws of nature, anyway. Haven't ever seen any clear examples of it, but I'm still open to that possibility. I guess I'm with the Rev. Ralph Waldo Emerson on this; "The gods we worship write their names on our faces, be sure of that. And a man will worship something — have no doubt about that, either. He may think that his tribute is paid in secret in the dark recesses of his heart — but it will out. That which dominates will determine his life and character. Therefore, it behooves us to be careful what we worship, for what we are worshipping we are becoming."

...Maybe Karl Rove's God was/is a pig? Who knows?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. reminds me of sidewalk grafitti at Washington University, circa 1977
first square
"God is dead" - Neitche
second square
"Nietsche is dead" -- God.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. If only god were as dead as Nietsche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-27-09 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. Is the supernatural, the unexplainable, unknowable, impossible?
Edited on Tue Jan-27-09 04:17 AM by Norrin Radd
Where did the universe/multiverse come from? Nothingness? This is unknowable. Also, something from nothing would be impossible. How are atoms, or whatever they divide down to (or multiply up to) self-aware? Or is reality and existence merely a dream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC