The students "Voted" via a survey and voted NO
Published December 03, 2008
http://www.columbiaspectator.com/2008/12/03/next-step-unclear-after-split-survey-resultsA day after voting closed on the controversial Reserve Officer Training Corps student survey, student government leaders were sharply split on how to interpret the results.
The survey—which asked undergraduates “Do you support bringing a Naval ROTC program to Columbia’s campus?”—aimed to gauge student opinion on Columbia’s 40-year-old ban on ROTC programs on campus. The results of the vote, which concluded Monday, are supposed to inform the undergraduate University senators as they weigh whether or not to bring the issue to the full University Senate this year. However, the student leaders who brought the issue to the forefront seemed split Tuesday on whether the results of the survey are valid and whether they call for further consideration of the issue.
Barnard’s survey results, announced Tuesday, revealed that the school is solidly against the proposal: 736 students, or 61.9 percent, voted against it, while 38.1 percent voted for it.
Columbia’s three undergraduate schools—Columbia College, the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and the School of General Studies—conducted the survey together. Students in those three schools were almost evenly divided on the vote, with students coming out against the proposal by a hair’s width: 1,502 (50.56 percent) voted no, 1,463 (49.24 percent) voted yes, and six (0.20 percent) abstained.
Contentious discussion about the NROTC proposal, which has been a source of controversy since the idea of a student survey was first floated in October, continued after the survey results were announced Tuesday. Though his fellow council leaders expressed confidence in the voting system, General Studies Student Council president Brody Berg publicly spoke out against the computerized survey in an e-mail to constituents Tuesday. Berg referred to defects in the system, including allegations that it enabled students to vote multiple times.