Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US High court rejects case of injured Wal-Mart employee (Shank to Wal-Mart: 'Be a human being')

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:39 PM
Original message
US High court rejects case of injured Wal-Mart employee (Shank to Wal-Mart: 'Be a human being')

http://www.nwaonline.net/articles/2008/03/18/business/031908shankruling.txt

Shank to Wal-Mart: 'Be a human being'
Last updated Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:21 PM CDT in Business

A former Wal-Mart employee has reached the end of the road for legal recourse against her former employer.

Debbie Shank, of Cape Girardeau, Mo., will have to reimburse Wal-Mart almost $500,000 following a bitter legal dispute over the rights to her settlement money from a traffic accident that left her brain damaged, disabled and penniless.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear her case, and let stand a ruling by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis that Shank pay Wal-Mart $470,000 the retailer spent on her medical care.

Jim Shank, Debbie's husband, contemplated the future of his family and fielded calls from the media on a stormy Tuesday in the St. Louis area.

"She's 52 and she's going to live a life in a nursing home. I just got a call today from the head nurse, and (Debbie) hasn't eaten in a couple days and she's talking about wanting to die," Shank said. "It makes the visits hard."

His wife remains severely brain damaged and disabled in a semi-private room of a nursing home that her family is unsure it will be able to afford after Wal-Mart is paid. The settlement money, plus almost $52,000, is now owed to Wal-Mart.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Amy6627 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is F*CKING discusting! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. My Sister used shop @ Wal-Mart until I showed her....
Edited on Thu Mar-20-08 05:49 AM by Earth Bound Misfit
this story. She doesn't shop there anymore.

Source:WSJ

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119551952474798582.html?mod=blog

"I don't understand why they need to do this," says Mr. Shank on a recent visit to the nursing home, between shifts as a maintenance worker and running a tanning salon. "This girl needs the money more than they do." Mrs. Shank, who needs help with eating and other basic tasks, spends more time alone since Mr. Shank had to let her private caregiver go. At some point, he says, she may have to be moved from a private to a semi-private room in the nursing home where she lives.

The reason is a clause in Wal-Mart's health plan that Mrs. Shank didn't notice when she started stocking shelves at a nearby store eight years ago. Like most company health plans, Wal-Mart's reserves the right to recoup the medical expenses it paid for someone's treatment if the person also collects damages in an injury suit.

Until recently, many employers didn't vigilantly enforce the provision, and some states and federal courts didn't think the claim held water. But as the cost of covering workers continues to escalate, employers and health plans are getting more aggressive about going after the money. A Supreme Court ruling last year also has given them a clearer legal map to suing employees and winning.

In insurance circles, the recovery practice is called "subrogation." Employers and insurers say it's necessary to ensure that medical expenses aren't paid twice. By recovering those costs from someone who's been compensated elsewhere, they argue, they're saving money for everyone on the plan.

Sharon Weber, a spokeswoman for Wal-Mart, declined to discuss the details of the Shanks' case, but said the company was obliged to act in the interest of the health benefits of its employees as a whole. "While the case involves a tragic situation, our responsibility is to follow the provisions of the plan which governs the health benefits of our associates," she said.

"Employers are trying to make sure these plans run as efficiently as possible," says Jay Kirschbaum, a senior vice president at global insurance broker Willis Group Holdings. "They also have a fiduciary duty to the plan and the entire group of employees that are covered by it."

On edit: FIDUCIARY DUTY MY FLABBY WHITE ASS! THEY COULD'VE GOTTEN SOME MUCH NEEDED GOOD PR BY JUST LETTING THE SHANKS KEEP THE MONEY, BUT THE GREEDY BASTARDS CAN'T SEE THE FOREST FOR THE TREES.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Shanks

Above, Deborah and Jim Shank. Right, a photo of the family before the accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why you must NEVER SHOP at WalMart, ever
When these people die, they will be as naked, penniless and dead as the rest of us, but until then, do not enrich these scumbags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC