Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Hill: NLRB A Far Cry From Fair

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 07:56 PM
Original message
The Hill: NLRB A Far Cry From Fair

http://blog.thehill.com/2007/10/05/nlrb-a-far-cry-from-fair/

October 5th, 2007

Shameful. That’s the only way to describe the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) decision to reverse more than 40 years of precedent this week in its decision to allow a small minority of anti-union workers to strip the majority of their right to join a union and bargain collectively with their employer.

At a time when America isn’t working the way it should for working people, the Bush labor board is pulling the rug out from under our nation’s middle class through decisions that amount to a dramatic change in our nation’s labor laws.

The latest ruling by the Bush board, stemming from a case involving an agreement by Dana Corp. and Metaldyne Corp. with the United Autoworkers not to interfere in workers’ efforts to form a union if a majority has signed union authorization cards, would effectively permit a minority of employees to negate the majority’s decision to have a union. The ruling would extend to instances even where the employer has agreed to recognize the union through majority sign-up or “card check” process, and is already engaged in bargaining with the union for a contract. The ruling means that as few as 30 percent of the employees will be able to cause any such recognition to be set aside and force an NLRB election to try to get rid of the union.

In its decision, the Board fails to offer a valid explanation for these drastic changes in labor law. The two dissenting members of the five-member board, Wilma Liebman and Dennis Walsh, say this “sea change in labor law” will “cut voluntary recognition off at the knees.”

The fact is the NLRB process is so severely broken that the majority of workers in our country who successfully form a union now do so through a voluntary recognition process. In allowing a small group of workers to undermine both the majority of workers’ and the employer’s wishes, the labor board is effectively making a mockery of the law’s allowance for voluntary recognition. Workers who attempt to join or form unions through the NLRB election process are routinely subjected to harassment, intimidation and even fired, which is why momentum continues to build for the Employee Free Choice Act.

The NLRB, like many other government agencies under this administration, has shown itself again to be little more than a political tool of right-wing Republicans in their continuing assault on America’s working families.

It’s time for the politicization at the NLRB to stop. We need to elect a president in 2008 who will appoint fair-minded, non-partisan members to important government bodies like the NLRB. We need to pass the Employee Free Choice Act so workers’ basic freedoms are respected instead of infringed upon. And finally, we need to return the promise of America to our beleaguered middle class.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-11-07 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tom Geoghegan was right
Labor should never have bought into these so-called "progressive" statutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC