Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Are Teachers Worth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Modern School Donating Member (558 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 04:34 PM
Original message
What Are Teachers Worth?

Capitalists build their wealth primarily through the exploitation of workers. They do this by paying them as little as possible while squeezing as much work out of them as they can. In effect, they pay their workers less than the value of the goods and services they produce. The greater the difference between workers salaries and the value of these goods and services the greater the profits. This simple fact helps explain why, even though worker productivity has been steadily increasing over the past 50 years, the purchasing power of their income and their leisure time have been stagnant or declining.

This principle is fairly obvious in the private sector, where goods and services are sold on the open market. It becomes a little hazier in the public sector, where workers are paid by the government out of tax revenues. Yet even here, the work that is done is done to help maintain the property and profits of ruling elite (i.e., the 1%). The workers are still providing services to consumers. Teachers, for example, have the responsibility of helping to ensure that some children grow up with the skills required to become the future managers, administrators and bosses, while the vast majority gain just enough skills to become their employees. Nurses help keep people healthy enough to stay on the job or return to work after an illness or injury. If too many people are home sick for too long, productivity starts to decline, as do profits.

The question is, how do we calculate the value of these services?

The value of a good or service can be estimated based on what people are willing to pay for it. With education, for example, people typically pay between $10,000 and $20,000 per year to send their children to modest private schools, and considerably more for the elite ones. For a teacher working in small privates school classes of 20 students, this comes to $200,000-$400,000 per year. For those of us working in one of Californias bloated classrooms of 35-38 students, this comes to $350,000-$700,000 per year.

One might argue that tuition (or public school funding) must cover numerous other costs in addition to teacher salaries, like rent, supplies, maintenance, administrative costs and salaries of nonteaching staff. The same argument is often made with regards the private sector (e.g., the costs of raw materials, rent, investment costs and the value of the owners willingness to risk his money). However, in both cases, nothing gets done and no profits are possible without the workers who produce the goods and services in question. These other costs are often nominal compared with salaries. But most importantly, it is the bosses ability to pay workers less than their labor is worth that allows them to grow their capital and earn their profits. A business owner can invest in property or machinery, but without employees, the shelves remain empty. Likewise, in a school devoid of teachers, learning is limited.

Technically, a school could be run entirely by the teachers and support staff, without any administrators at all. It could be run collectively, with workers councils making operating, as well as pedagogical decisions. However, it is not just site administrators that could be downsized. Most districts are quite top-heavy at their district headquarters, with superintendents and numerous assistant and associate superintendents, all garnering six-figure salaries. Schools that are run by the workers have no need for all this management. Even a small district of only five or six schools may have 2-3 administrators at each school site, plus another 3-5 working downtown, at a cost of $2-5 million.

Another significant but unnecessary cost to public schools that has little to do with childrens education and wellbeing is accountability. Schools spend millions on standardized tests, curricular support for the tests, and software to analyze the tests. Not only is this a huge waste of money, it is money that could go to teacher remuneration. Instead, it is used to manipulate and control teachers, forcing them to work longer and harder in hopes of raising test scores, taking time and energy away from teaching as well as organizing and advocating for better working conditions.

Educational bureaucracies, in general, divert large sums of money away from education, as well as educators salaries. But they do open the doors for numerous private sector entrepreneurs to grab a little piece of the action, like multibillion dollar text book and processed food giants. Thus, instead of well-paid teachers and well-fed students, we get overworked, burned out teachers and malnourished students who get their daily dose of vegetables from the tomato paste on their pizzas.

Modern School
http://modeducation.blogspot.com/2011/11/what-are-teach...
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. School administrations are superfluous for the most part.
The LA schools have a huge administrative staff. Just what they do is puzzling.

Obviously, the accounting department has a heavy load.

But beyond that, a few administrators should be able to handle the load.

As for enforcing truancy laws. How important are those laws anyway?

Seems to me that parents should enforce those laws.

If the parents don't care whether their children attend school and do homework and learn, why push the kids?

Parents should bear some responsibility.

Obviously, a child who does not attend school faces a bleak future. But even if you force a child to sit in a classroom, you can't force him or her to learn.

A lot of money that should be spent in the classroom is spent on administrative nonsense like this including the administration of standardized tests and scoring of those tests, teacher qualifications, visiting teachers in their classrooms (something that, again, parents could do).

The money for schools should go to school maintenance, supplies and teachers' salaries and not a lot of the unnecessary things it is spent on today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-24-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lots of money is spent on tests and test practice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-25-11 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Actually they address the crushing administrative burden placed on schools
It has been growing for years and continues to. Federal and state mandates have forced the growing administrative load. Address that and the administrative overheads can drop
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-26-11 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. In NYC it's beyond "puzzling"; it's a friggin' mystery.
Edited on Sat Nov-26-11 09:13 AM by Smarmie Doofus
>>>>The LA schools have a huge administrative staff. Just what they do is puzzling.>>>>>

Jobs for pals is a big part of it. And pals of pals. And brothers and sisters-in-laws. And on and on it goes.


Another mystery is why Obama-style corporate school "reform" never wants to look in this direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Sep 21st 2018, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC