Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Conservatives Raise Questions About (Obama's pick) OSHA Nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-04-09 07:51 PM
Original message
NYT: Conservatives Raise Questions About (Obama's pick) OSHA Nominee

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/09/24/24greenwire-conservatives-raise-questions-about-osha-nomin-31249.html

By SARA GOODMAN of Greenwire
Published: September 24, 2009

Conservative pundits and activists are taking aim at President Obama's pick to head the Occupational Safety and Health Administration for his writings about the dangers of various pollutants and hazardous materials.

Obama nominated David Michaels, an epidemiologist and former Energy Department official, to direct the Labor Department agency that enforces workplace safety and health legislation. The nomination came in late July, but a date has not yet been set for a confirmation hearing as the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee has been focused almost exclusively on health care legislation.

Some on the right are trying to use the delay to spark opposition against Michaels, calling him a proponent of junk science, anti-business and anti-guns.

Hans Bader, a legal scholar at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a free-market advocacy group, said several of Michaels' views on issues could directly impact the agency that enforces workplace safety and health legislation.

"I can see why there would be concern," Bader said. "He seems to want to loosen restrictions on junk science ... it seems reasonable for senators to take a closer look at his nomination."

Of particular concern to Bader are some of Michaels' writings, including a 2008 book he wrote called "Doubt is Their Product," in which he describes how some corporations skew the scientific debate about the dangers of various pollutants and hazardous materials. In it, Michaels documents cases in which corporations -- such as the tobacco industry -- hire their own scientists and lobbyists to dispute scientific evidence about public health threats.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC