Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New kind of health plan at a company... feedback wanted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 03:54 AM
Original message
New kind of health plan at a company... feedback wanted
OK... I do consulting for some HR departments of large companies RE/health plans. I wanted to get some feedback for what one company is looking at since this is going to be a huge departure from the normal:

Plan benfits -- basically pays all health expenses (but read below).

Costs:

$25/month / Body Mass Index above 25 up to $250/month.
$200/month if smoker

BMI Penalty is halved if you attend a gym (for free) 12 days a month or more
Smokers penalty is reduced to $100/month if you are invloved in a quit smoking program (again, all subsitutes, zyban, gum, counseling is free). It is elminated 6mos after successful completion.
Any employee gets access to the best health club in town free if they use it 11+ times a month, if less, then they must pay.
All doctor visits, drugs, tests, etc are free if you've recieved a (free) physical and appropriate vaccinations in the last 13 months. Otherwise you have to pay a $100 copay.
All dental exams and work is free, assuming you have 2 cleanings in the last 13 mos.
All OTC drugs are free with script.
The doctor/hospital/dentist network is the same PPO as they currently have.

They estimate the plan will cost about the same amount as a traditional PPO plan now in place. I was wondering -- any thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds pretty discrimatory to me
Some people have genes that put them above BMI of 25.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sgent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Currently
there is nothing (in this area at least) that creates a problem on that level -- no law against discriminating due to genetic status. That being said, their might be some ADA concerns so thanks for mentioning it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idylle Moon Dancer Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. BMI is faulty, IMHO
at least the one that came with a pamphlet on lowering blood pressure that my doctor gave me. It says I'm obese. I am NOT obese. Overweight, yes, but not obese. I'm just built differently than the average person. The last time they weighed me, the nurse seemed moderately surprised at the reading and said "you carry it well" or somesuch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Anorexics aren't healthy
and they get a free ride on this plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Considering the ratio of anorexics to overweight people in the US, I'd say
their bets are hedged in the right direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're Right - Anorexics Die Young; Cost Less
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Cats cause allergies
so there should be a penalty for cat owners.
Unless they have that hypoallergenic cat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Mental Health Screenings
Depression = $$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. Heroin addicts would have a low BMI, too
of course, they would probably fail the necessary drug screening...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Low glycemic diet + moderate exercise
Edited on Tue Jan-10-06 04:39 AM by bananas
eat like a diabetic and live forever.

edit: two drinks a day - at least!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Considering the alternative, why not? At this rate, you're lucky to even
have a health care program, the way things are going for most businesses and corporations. Promoting a healthy lifestyle is beneficial for everyone. I wish I'd been offered a gym for free, that's fantastic!

I like the incentives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. Only If There's a Substantial Obstetric Penalty - $5K Per Delivery, Say
Then it'd be fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. I cannot stand gyms but exercise at home 6 times a week
would that be OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. No
you would have to use the treadmill at the gym
and be forced to watch fox news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. but, I'm too out of shape to exercise...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. honestly
I would rather be out of shape - I am serious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. According to this plan, yes.
The only benefit tied to going to the gym is that you get in free if you use it 11+ times a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. I wish we had a plan this good -- I think it's great
And a GREAT way to help encourage employees to stay -- or get -- healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. The misery of poor health isn't enough of a 'punishment' ...
... so let's be sure to pile on. Let's charge people more for health care, airplane seats, clothes, and ... hell, while we're at it, let's just take their homes and property and throw them into the streets, huh?

After all, everyone knows that being sick is a moral failing. Therefore, let's form a religion and condemn sick people to Hell.

I just love the moralizing on DU. :puke:

Let's stone 'em!! Kill! Kill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. I don't know what everybody's bitching about with this plan
Just for my husband (I can't get insurance for less than double what we make a month) insurance that might as well have 'good only until needed' at the bottom of it costs us $600/mo. He's overweight and would probably hit the $250/month penalty but a non-smoker so something like this would save us more than it costs and give him a chance of actually losing weight and being more healthy. We'd grab that in minute.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
18. Look at everyone scramble to line up for discriminatory policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Yeah, well, when you have nothing
or less than nothing when you're paying for something you know you'll never be allowed to use, something like this looks pretty good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. This is an example of how easily working class folks are divided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think BMI is complete and total bullshit
According to BMI, someone who is six feet tall should weigh between 136.5 and 183.5 pounds.

Have you ever seen someone who was six feet tall and who weighed 150 pounds? They don't exactly look healthy to me.


No wonder so many Americans are overweight. Being 6' and weighing 185 is "overweight"!



BTW, if it were calculated on anything else, I would think this was an interesting idea for a plan. Especially if the penalty is halved for gym membership, and especially if that membership is not only free, but if the gym is accessible.

Of course, there is still the drawback that some people may not have time to work out, even a few times a month...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Nearly everyone is obese under BMI
I think that alone might account for the "obesity epidemic". It is a crock, in my opinion and should not be given the authority that it has been given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Quaterback Tom Brady - Overweight.
He is 6'4" and 225 pounds, a BMI of 27.4. He is overweight.


Larry Johnson, breakout running back for the chiefs who racked up more yards in 10 games than most running backs do in a season:
6'1", with a BMI of 30.3, and is therefore obese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
25. Some meds, such as some antidepressants cause weight gain.

Sounds pretty discriminatory to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
26. It's a bit Orwellian
Some people are just fat. It's genetic and they can't help it.

Besides that, it seems too into managing people's lives. Smoking is bd, and maybe incentives to quit should be included. But where do you draw the line. Will they start charging more if you eat the wrong food, or if you spend too much time at home on the couch?

How about peope with natutal diseases? Do they get penalized?

Maybe your client should have two plans that people can chose from.One a basic, somewhat more expensive and basic plan without all the strings attached, and another with those built-in carrots and sticks for those who choose a "welness" lifstyle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
27. Maybe the preventive aspects are good, but I personally believe
in liberty. I don't care for the 'nanny state' nor for someone else to make my life decisions for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
28. "estimate.. cost about the same...
This year. Do they have any hard data to back up that assertion? Bet not. Remember when HMOs were the new best thing and promoted as lower cost alternatives to indemnity coverage?

They may be offered a plan that cooks the numbers to hold costs this year but watch out next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
30. I like the focus on preventive medicine, and I'd be THRILLED
to have access to such a program. But I'm not a smoker nor overweight. I think the penalty for them is too steep -- would an overweight smoker have to pay up to $450 a month?

There are other behaviors that are risky healthwise (drinking, taking heroin, reckless driving, extreme sports, unsafe sex) but the risk for those behaviors is carried by everyone. Why should only certain behaviors be penalized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. I'm all for reasonable incentives to encourage healthy lifestyles but
this plan seems to imply that only fat people have health problems. Not true.

My company gives all employees a 10% discount on their premiums if they agree to participate in a voluntary health management program that works with the employee to monitor chronic conditions, such as diabetes, promote health weight control, etc. If you sign up and don't keep up with your participation, you lose your incentives and pay the normal hc premium rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
35. We need NHC. Privatization always will cherry pick the
healthier and those with healthier habits over those who actually need health care. These plans eventually fall apart because the doctors and hospitals stop accepting them once they don't get paid because the smoker or fat person they treated didn't follow the insurance company's rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-10-06 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. Several thoughts
A) Can the "best health club in town" handle all of the new customers? And what if I hate the owner of the "bhcit" or can't make it during their hours? I have no alternative?

B) Does the BMI take into account differing muscle-to-fat ratios of people? (I honestly don't know this).Taking myself as an example, I am a large-boned woman who also is overweight - a greater amount of my BMI is taken up by "legit" weight, not fat, than a smaller-framed female. What to do?

C) I foresee a situation where I must have emergency/near-emergency care before my doctor can see me for my annual physical - would that visit be subject to the $100 copay?

D) There is a serious school of medical thought that indicates annual physicals are not effective as a preventative measure. Has that been taken into account in this plan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC