Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Profiles in Cowardice .... Or Courage, the Cowardly Donkey

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:25 PM
Original message
Profiles in Cowardice .... Or Courage, the Cowardly Donkey
Here's a letter to the editor I am sending to my paper ......... Tell me what you think.

Profiles in Cowardice, or ……..
Courage, the Cowardly Donkey

The most frustrating aspect of being a Democrat today is not George W. Bush. It’s not the domination by the Republicans of every aspect of governance. It’s not even the silence of the citizenry in the face of Bush’s trampling of our most cherished freedoms in the name of freedom.

It’s the spinelessness of my own party.

In my lifetime, my nightmares never conjured up an America that freely adopted the terrors of the Soviet regime. Torture, secret prisons and verdicts, propaganda, spying on dissenters, the “disappeared”, election fraud, extraordinary rendition, all are commonplace now, accepted meekly in the land of the free and the home of the brave. And the reason for this state of affairs is not just that we have a president who believes that the Rule of Law does not apply to him, or that Republicans back this extraordinary grasp of kingly power, but also that many Democrats are too busy evaluating what political capital is to be gained by any position taken, to really take any position at all. Principled Democrats like Russ Feingold and Al Gore have been mocked and criticized for standing against this power grab, and not just by Republicans, but also by Democrats. And who can forget those brave Democrats (like Diane Feinstein) who called for the censure of Bill Clinton as punishment for lying about a consensual affair, but now flee from censuring Mr. Bush for his open and continued violations of US law.

Sadly, one immutable truth remains. Voters will never believe that Democrats will stand up to Al-Qaeda if they won’t stand up to Bush. If Democrats keep putting a wet finger up to test the political winds before taking a stand, they have signaled their strength of will and of character more loudly than any words they can ever say. Voters recognize a house built on sinking sand, and know that a party afraid of its own shadow may be too weak to build a strong fortress against terrorists.

I’ve always heard that we teach others how to treat us. The Democrats have taught the populace and the media to paint them as weak on security issues because they refuse to stand up when it really counts, when it’s a risk, when it’s for principle. They fear alienating the mythic center, although poll after poll paradoxically indicates that the center believes in the very principles the Democrats are afraid to embrace. And say what you will about the Republicans, no one will ever mistake them for being weak - their willingness to go for the kill, even in the wrong places and of the wrong people - provides a tempting illusion of strength.

Strength sells, especially in a time of terror. So it is ironic indeed that the political power the Democrats crave so desperately that they fear taking the wrong stand, is likely never to materialize because they failed to take a stand at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Well done.
It certainly nails the state of the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks...........
Any suggestions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Back dated three years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't understand
what you mean. Backdated 3 years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I should have said back date it three years.
Actually right after election in Florida in 2000. I was just being a smart ass. (Or a dumb ass) Not trying to be a hard ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Oh, now I see. Duh!
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SushiFan Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Send it to the editor, but also send a copy to
the Capitol Hill Dem leadership. They really need to hear what the average democrat really thinks about their pitiful temerity. They need to hear this badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good idea.
I'll do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Great idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bravo!
:applause: I like it. Many here have had quibbles about the Clinton censure reference (as in, was it to stop impeachment or actually afterwards or in addition to impeachment) and it might give opposing views a little tidbit to gnaw on in lieu of digesting the rest but, otherwise, it's an honest opinion (that I agree with!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thanks
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. While I agree with practically all that you have written...
...I'm of two minds about the letter. You see, I also agree with the people at MyDD and DailyKos who think that this sort of infighting in a public venue only helps to cement the Republican meme that "Democrats are wimps" -- a message that will wind up hurting all Democrats, as voters won't want "weaklings" protecting us from terraists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. I thought about that when
I was writing it, but figured the damage was already done. I gave a substantial amount of money to the Democrats last year, enough that they might pay some attention if they look me up. I just can't figure out how to import spine into them. I figured if a contributing member of the party criticized them, maybe, just maybe, they'd listen.

But I see your misgivings. I just don't know how else to get their attention and I'm frankly sick of soft peddling my frustration with their inaction in the face of the loss of this democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm kicking this for further consideration
I'll kick it once more in the morning, and then I'll send it to the papers with suggested changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
15. Kick. One more time for the
morning group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. One kick for the afternoon crowd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. Good job!
Not very long ago (last week), I would have cringed at this. But not any more. They ARE spineless. Maybe shame will spur them on. God knows nothing else seems to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I would have never sent this
a week ago. I'm just so disgusted, I don't know what else to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. VOTE THIS UP, Peeps!
Edited on Fri Mar-17-06 12:54 PM by rucky
Well said! Reminds me of those Budweiser ads on the radio.

Mr. Mealy-mouthed politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Wow. Thanks.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kicked and recommended!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TiredTexan Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks all.
I think I'll go ahead and submit it as is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC