Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scotty Press Brief says Bush didn't order Strikes in Iraq, Generals Did!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:43 PM
Original message
Scotty Press Brief says Bush didn't order Strikes in Iraq, Generals Did!
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:48 PM by KoKo01
Isn't this something new in Presidential Authority? President allows Generals to plan and impliment strikes without him authorizing them?

More of lack of judgement by "Hands Off" P-Resident...who never is involved in any decision but delegates everything to underlings. But allowing Generals to do their OWN MILITARY STRIKES without oversight?

David Gregory kept asking and Scott kept saying President didn't order the strikes it was "Commanders on the Ground."

Is this LEGAL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Silly You ~ if Bush did it ~ it's legal :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I guess they don't call him the Vacationing Chimp for nothing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. bubble boy just said yesterday"gotta tight team"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. The eloquence just overwhelms me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does Scotty mean we have a military coup taking place?
I am absolutely mystified by this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Doesn't matter! He's still the Commander in Chief!
Good or bad, the Commander is responsible to all military actions!

Someone should explain that to Scotty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. He has the authority to do whatever he wants
but is required to accept responsibility for none of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. "The Buck Stops Here" does not compute with the chimp.
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:47 PM by babylonsister
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/buckstop.htm

snip//
The saying "the buck stops here" derives from the slang expression "pass the buck" which means passing the responsibility on to someone else. The latter expression is said to have originated with the game of poker, in which a marker or counter, frequently in frontier days a knife with a buckhorn handle, was used to indicate the person whose turn it was to deal. If the player did not wish to deal he could pass the responsibility by passing the "buck," as the counter came to be called, to the next player.*

On more than one occasion President Truman referred to the desk sign in public statements. For example, in an address at the National War College on December 19, 1952 Mr. Truman said, "You know, it's easy for the Monday morning quarterback to say what the coach should have done, after the game is over. But when the decision is up before you -- and on my desk I have a motto which says The Buck Stops Here' -- the decision has to be made." In his farewell address to the American people given in January 1953, President Truman referred to this concept very specifically in asserting that, "The President--whoever he is--has to decide. He can't pass the buck to anybody. No one else can do the deciding for him. That's his job.

snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. it was the Generals, it was the CIA, it was Brownie, it was-it was Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. On MSNBC Jim Mik..? said Pentagon "scrambling" for information.
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:53 PM by madfloridian
I heard him say that the Pentagon was "scrambling" to come up with information on this.

I thought...uh oh how strange. Sorry don't know how to spell his name wasn't paying attention to the spelling..he is the Pentagon spokesman for MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. He's involved with one of the Think Tanks.....and seemed lately to
have turned on Bush....so that's really interesting that he said that...

If Bush is claiming he didn't know...shouldn't Rummy have known. SHEESH...it gets worse...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Jim Micklqwertyuiopshevshki
been watching him years, and couldn't spell his name if my life depended on it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. self delete
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 01:00 PM by Neil Lisst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Mik -la-sheff-skee
My daughter went to high school with his son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. I can say it! I can't spell it!!
Of course, I've never studied his name, either.

He's one of the few remaining "real" reporters on TV news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It's Miklaszewski
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. Yes it is. * put them in charge. As C in C he is allowed to this.
but it's bullshit - a major operation of this size would never go forward without the president or at least Dick Cheney signing off on it. so they are lying. They are trying to give dim son a cut out when things get ugly, like they did the ports "I didn't know about that".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Actually yes - and it's usually better that way
I say usually - because the last thing you normally want is a President micro-managing a war. Battlefield decisions are usually left up to the commanders.

We've already seen what direct presidential involvement has done with this war - rejecting commanders' calls for more troops, underestimating the insurgency, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I thought Bushies excuse, though, was that Bremer screwed it all up....
:shrug: Just like Brownie screwed up Katrina operations...and all the other messes that he says he didn't know about.

Still...it would seem that the "biggest air strikes since the Invasion" would need to have input from the President. What about Renegade Military?
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wha...??
Did Bush even know about it? What if the "Generals" decide to strike Iran? Can they do that without approval? This sounds bad to me. The military must be under civilian control, even during war. They should never, never be permittted to make unilateral decisions such as these in a premeditated way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Another crime by the crime family, when will it ever end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. I know...it's frightening. At least CNN/MSNBC did try to bring it up and
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 01:04 PM by KoKo01
even asked if this was coordinated with Bush's falling poll numbers on Iraq and the release today of his NSA's confirmation that Bush has sumpreme authority to use "Pre-Emptive Strike."

Helen Thomas worked Scotty over on his "Pre-Emptive Strike" pretty hard. Scotty was at his worst robot speak but seemed a little shaken. He was snapping at Helen and David Gregory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. OK - so they identified a need and made the plans, Gotcha.
but doesn't the president have to approve them?

What's all this BS about Bush focusing like a laser on Iraq then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Maybe the generals will decide to do a few other things...
is it a military junta?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fucking Asswipe Neocons! NO ONE is at the helm
This administration is so out of control that NO ONE is leading! Global impact decisions are unilaterally being made by different people in different places and NO ONE can be held accountable. And if things don't go well, turn out very badly, then the blame can go to A FEW BAD APPLES!

:wtf: :nuke: :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. in other words, Halliburton.
and it wouldn't be *moron ordering, but the real pResident, that dick cheney fella in charge.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. The reason is so when the gig is up * can say he didn't ok that
I would think that something of this magnitude would need to be ok'ed by the prez, but not this one. I say it is illegal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. it's the Ken Lay defense - My Underlings Made Me Do It!!
it's the Ken Lay defense - My Underlings Made Me Do It!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. So Bush does not have hands on? I think this is a LBJ thing
So when they wright the books we find out what really went on? I really think we have done enough to Iraq. I am sure they will recall who we are and maybe give us a little better rate than Saddam. God but I do pity those poor people and this endless killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Blaming the troops? How Republican of them!
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 01:11 PM by IanDB1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
26. Law of the pasture: . . . . If it smells like bullshit, it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. The press conference was up at
Whitehouse.gov but now it isn't.

I was watching it and the feed stopped, when I went back it wasn't available.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. If you ever find it please post. DU'ers need to Read it...to see what
Scott said and the interaction with David Gregory and Helen Thomas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Does this mean we're on "auto-war?"
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. The Sock Puppet's Impeachment Defense.
Uh... " I didn't know nothin'because I was out ridin' my bike."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. * didn't know till he heard it on the news, huh
The same old story. Who's running the asylum?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. the crazy naked guy whe eats flies and talks to himself
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC