Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right-Wing e-mail on Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 03:53 PM
Original message
Right-Wing e-mail on Social Security
Dear Friends:

Many years ago in Seattle, two wonderful neighbors, Elliott and Patty Roosevelt came to my home to swim on a regular basis. They were a great couple full of laughter and stories that today I continue to marvel at. Both are now deceased, but their stories remain. During the years of our friendship we had many, many discussions about his parents (President Franklin D. and Eleanor Roosevelt) and how his father and mother never intended for the Social Security and Welfare programs to turn out the way they are today. Elliott used to say that if his mother returned to earth and saw what the politicians had done to their programs she would have burned all of them in hell.

Here is a story I received today regarding the Social Security Program and I immediately thought of Elliott's comments. Hope you will read this and think about it.


Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised:


1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual incomes into the Program,

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent "Trust Fund" rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and,

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.


Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to "put away," you may be interested in the following:

--------------------

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust" fund and put it into the General fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

--------------------

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

--------------------

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the U.S.

-------------------

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

-------------------

Then, after doing all this lying and thieving and violation of the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!


And the worst part about it is, uninformed citizens believe it!


If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.


But it's worth a try.
How many people can YOU send this to?

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.

Please forward this E-mail to others so that they can be informed of the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm pretty sure that most (if not all) of those assertions
were refuted. It might be a tedious Google search, so i'll put it off for a while. If nobody else here on DU responds, I'll try this evening.

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. See Snopes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. DANG!!
And I had a Snopes tab in my Firefox browser, and use it frequently!

The person who passed that on, may have done so in "good faith", but the originator of that tripe contrived it as a deliberate LIE. And THEY are the pompous bastards who prate on about "The decline of civility in public discourse"!!! FASCISTIC LYING RATS!!!

pnorman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. My right-wing Oklahoma uncle e-mailed it to me.. Still waiting
on his reply to the snopes link.. and I probably never will hear a reply..ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, you most definitely WON'T!
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 02:24 AM by pnorman
But since he's your uncle, resist the urge to "rub it in". Prior to the conclusion of WW1, Oklahoma (like Kansas) had a very STRONG Populist tradition. It was largely the massive and brutal government repression that did it in. Google "green corn rebellion". Also check this link out: http://www.citizenalert.org/newsltr/summer2003corn.html

Sometimes, the ONLY thing that "saves" us is the blind and bull-headed arrogance of the enemy. And that describes this BushCo gang to a Tee. We're (almost) all in the same boat. Don't write ANYONE off without doing your best to turn them around. This is the most important "battle" anyone here has ever faced. Don't blow it!

pnorman
On edit: I noticed that "JOURNAL" was no longer greyed out, so I "clicked" on it. PRESTO! Now I ARE a journalist! (Gotta RTFM one day!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brewman_Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. SOP for freeper scum
it's the lies and hypocrisy that annoy me most. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Snopes is our friend when it comes to verifying this type of email.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoAmericanTaliban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe it was Reagan who raised the tax on SS
in order to cover the tax breaks he did in the mid-80s. It may be under him that the retirement age was increased as well. If the repukes don't like it then they shouldn't accept any money from SS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dora Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's a little snip from Snopes....
No one — whether he be a citizen, immigrant, or illegal alien — is eligible to collect Social Security benefits unless he (or someone else, such as a parent or spouse) has paid into the system. Someone has confused Social Security itself with Supplemental Security Income (SSI) — the latter is a federal welfare program "designed to help aged, blind, and disabled people, who have little or no income" by providing "cash to meet basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter." Immigrants can qualify for SSI benefits under certain conditions, but SSI is financed by general revenues and not Social Security taxes. SSI was not enacted by the administration of President Jimmy Carter (a Democrat); it was created and signed into law in 1972, during the administration of President Richard Nixon (a Republican).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. several months ago I had a running "argument" with a repug in
Edited on Tue Mar-14-06 04:13 PM by madmom
my area on just this topic thru letters to the editor of our daily rag. All these statements can be refuted by going to :

www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths.html

www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html


read all they have to say and follow the links and you'll have all the ammo you need to call them on their lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainscents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. This email went around few years ago!
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 03:08 AM by Rainscents
Damn, it's making another around. :crazy: Make sure when sending email back to him, make sure you forward to all! That way every one he sent out chain emals to, they'll get yours too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The first thing I did was look at who he sent it too, and sent them an
e-mail link to Snopes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC