Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quietly, US BUYS $38 Million Of Depleted Uranium Tank Shells

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:22 AM
Original message
Quietly, US BUYS $38 Million Of Depleted Uranium Tank Shells
U.S. signs $38 million deal for depleted uranium tank shells
John Byrne
Published: March 2, 2006


The U.S. Army quietly placed an order for $38 million in depleted uranium rounds last week, bringing the total order from a West-Virginia based company to $77 million for fiscal year 2006, RAW STORY has learned.

The munition is highly controversial. While the Pentagon has been ambiguous about its health toll, leftover rounds from the first Gulf War are believed to have caused a significant increase in cancer and birth defects in Iraq. According to a detailed article by the Seattle Post-Intelligencer in 2002, "Many researchers outside Iraq, and several U.S. veterans organizations, agree; they also suspect depleted uranium of playing a role in Gulf War Syndrome, the still-unexplained malady that has plagued hundreds of thousands of Gulf War veterans."

The new $38 million order was placed with Alliant Techsystems for 120-mm ammunition. Once the new pact is completed the firm will have produced 35,000 rounds for the U.S. military

http://rawstory.com/news/2006/U.S._signs_38_million_deal_for_0302.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. More nuclear war
goody! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wonderful
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. For our next invasions? Iran??
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 10:26 AM by FloridaPat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or Syria. Or maybe Pakistan
It depends on who seems the most vulnerable target as we get closer to the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. That story is all wrong
Iran is about to use nukes not the U.S.! We never would drop nukes or use Depleted Uranium laden shells that containment the environment with radiation. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who is it in this administration that has the biggest jones
for death, torture, disease and destruction? My money is on Smirky. Didn't he hurt animals as a child? It might be Rummy, too. More than likely Condi as well. Probably Bolton as well. They are all sick, sick people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick and recommend
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. I gladly put this one over the top
They can deny all they want, but this is still going to be the "Agent Orange" of the
Iraq conflict.

Wonder what the UN has to say about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. depleted uranium weapons are WMDs, and their use is . . .
both a war crime of the highest order AND a crime against humanity . . .

Depleted Uranium Is WMD
By Leuren Moret
Scoop Independent News
Tuesday August 9, 2005

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0510/S00138.htm

My grandfather, U.S. Army Col. Edwin Joseph McAllister, was born in Battle Creek in 1895. He does not know that his first grandchild is an international expert on depleted uranium. I have worked in two U.S. nuclear weapons laboratories, and in 1991 I became a whistleblower at the Livermore lab. Depleted uranium is very, very, very nasty stuff:

# Depleted uranium (DU) weaponry meets the definition of weapon of mass destruction in two out of three categories under U.S. Federal Code Title 50 Chapter 40 Section 2302.

# DU weaponry violates all international treaties and agreements, Hague and Geneva war conventions, the 1925 Geneva gas protocol, U.S. laws and U.S. military law.

# Since 1991, the U.S. has released the radioactive atomicity equivalent of at least 400,000 Nagasaki bombs into the global atmosphere. That is 10 times the amount released during atmospheric testing which was the equivalent of 40,000 Hiroshima bombs. The U.S. has permanently contaminated the global atmosphere with radioactive pollution having a half-life of 4.5 billion years.

- much more . . .

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0510/S00138.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The third point is amazingly misleading.
DU is radioactive but only very slightly so. The very fact that it has a half-life of 4.5 billion years tells you that it isn't very radioactive. (The shorter the half-life, the more radioactive an isotope is.) So they've put out 400,000 times as many U238 atoms as the U235 atoms used in the Nagasaki uranium bomb. This means nothing in terms of radioactivity -- the Nagasaki bomb was horrible because the act of detonation created a maelstrom of highly radioactive nuclear species. None of this exists in DU.

But this is not to diminish the danger of DU. Uranium happens to be a heavy, toxic metal. Using DU in battle aerosolizes it, it gets everywhere. I wouldn't be at all suprised if Gulf Syndrome or the cancers/birth defects in Iraqi children were related to DU. (However, DU isn't the only toxic thing in battle. There's an odd variety of parasites and diseases over there, as well.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC