Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Al Qaida winning?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Onlooker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:45 AM
Original message
Is Al Qaida winning?
I'm sure I don't need to the post the links about Mosques being burned and Shiites and Sunnis killing each other. It really does look like Iraq could be plummeting into civil war. From Al Qaida's perspective, this is good. So could this be Al Qaida's checklist:

(1) Attack the United States
(2) Turn the United States into an ally to overthrow Saddam
(3) Get the United States to create fear in Iran to secure victory for their religous right wing
(4) Promote chaos and anarchy in Iraq
(5) Get the people of Iraq to demand the U.S. to leave
(6) Use threats and violence to set up an anti-American Islamic state
(7) Build an alliance with Iran

If that's their plan, then they're now moving into step 4, and our best bet will be to shift the problem to the UN and provide the UN with the kind of military and humanitarian support it needs to try to stabilize the situation. It's a big mess the Republicans have made, and it won't be easy to fix, but one things for sure, let's not keep letting the guy who fell into Al Qaida's trap try to get us out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. You Forgot Pol... err I mean #8
(8) Destroy our freedoms.

That's why they hate us right? And, ShrubCo keeps caving to their demands.


Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Theoretically al qaeda despises shiite theocracies.
I guess I have a much more jaded view of the current situation.

1) Invent a replacement opponent for USSR in order to renew a state of permanent war.
2) Steal 2000 election so that executive branch is secured.
3) Opponent is ordered or is allowed to attack inside US in hugely visible manner.
4) Use attack to justify establishment of a one party tyranny and a permanent state of war and use these to plunder the world in a vast kleptocracy scheme.*
5) Invade Iraq.
6) Prepare to attack/invade Iran.
7) ...
8) oops we ran out of oil.

* corrupt entire election process to guarantee future victories while maintaining facade of institutional normalcy. Use kleptocracy controlled media to befuddle 70% of public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC