Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citgo, Buy-cotts, Etc ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:32 PM
Original message
Citgo, Buy-cotts, Etc ...
Edited on Sat Feb-18-06 05:37 PM by RoyGBiv
I was challenged in this thread about some information I and another respondent provided about the effectiveness of a so-called "buy-cott" designed to benefit Citgo and by extension poor people who benefit from the success of Citgo. (That other information is at Snopes and requires a thorough reading to understand the relevance.) Specifically I was offered an "education" on what logos mean, although the lesson didn't provide much substance and merely asserted that when you buy from a place displaying the Citgo logo, you are benefiting Citgo and by extension the poor. That is the context of this post, which contains comments that appear directed at an individual and may see somewhat disorganized because of that. I decided to provide this its own thread because I really don't feel like spending the effort I did on this and having it buried somewhere it might never be seen. This is very long, so I know most people won't bother anyway. So be it.

As a preface I'll note that I have no particular gripe with Hugo Chavez and think he has done some fine work in his own country and has offered valuable help to the needy in the US. This isn't about Chavez. It's about the energy business and the consumption of energy. A *enormous* level of misunderstanding exists about this. I've tilted at this windmill for a long time now, but this is the first time I've started a thread about it. I may regret it, but I'll dawn my flame-resistant suit and deal with it. I hope we're all here because we want to know things and want to receive accurate information, not run off on crusades based on wishful thinking. Finally, if you want to buy your gasoline at a Citgo station, that's perfectly fine with me. I'll even encourage it because it might have some small, positive impact. But, please be aware of what you are actually doing and do not fool yourself that you've engaged in any kind of "boycott" of other energy companies merely because you drive into a station with a Citgo symbol on it.

Before escaping to a better life, I worked for a time as a purchasing agent for gasoline and kept the books at several retail locations that sold gasoline and other products such as convenience store items. Gasoline sales were the most obnoxious part of the business because they require massive levels of expense in the form of permits, maintenance, paperwork, and headache yet provided very little in the way of profit to the retail operator. (4 cents per gallon gross was a great day. Enough to pay for the electricity required to run the pumps was acceptable.) Gasoline sales were necessary as what we call a "draw." People come into buy gasoline, and while they're there, they spend another $20 on items we purchased for half that. At any rate, one of these stations was a so-called Citgo station, one of the independently owned stations mentioned in the following.

The main point: Just because you buy your gas from a Citgo station does not mean you are buying Citgo gas or even directly supporting the Citgo company. The gasoline in the ground comes from many sources and is made from oil that comes from other sources.

Here are some bits to chew on.

The Citgo marquee at the one station I ran was there because the parent company that owned the station had an agreement with Citgo's credit division to honor Citgo credit cards from which we made a (very small) percentage of the profits on interest. Citgo paid us, IOW, and, yes, they made a tidy sum from interest payments. Citgo "markets" their products through approximately 145,000 *independently owned* stations throughout the US. The "logo" is essentially an advertising expense for Citgo. Now, if you use your Citgo credit card every time you fill up, you might have some level of a point, but I'm not real sure we should be encouraging racking up debt at an interest rate often in excess of 22%. Direct contributions to the poor would be more efficient and less costly. But, if that's what you want to do, go ahead. Just be honest about it and stop kidding yourself about "using Citgo gasoline." What you're advocating is acquiring Citgo sponsored debt.

Some data to consider: the refining capacity of US Citgo refineries is approximately 140 million barrels of gasoline per year (about 315 million barrels of all products, including jet fuel, etc.). In the United States, we consume approximately 9 million barrels of gasoline per day, about 3.2 billion barrels per year. (A barrel is approximately 42 gallons.) So, Citgo is capable of providing about 15 day's worth of gasoline to the US through its refineries assuming it runs at full capacity every day, but it actually provides less.

Citgo imported about 82 million barrels of crude into the US in the first half of 2005 (the most recent time period for which I could find good data). About 530,000 of those barrels came from the Persian Gulf, the rest mostly from Venezuela and Mexico. Assuming the second half of 2005 was similar to the first, we can estimate that Citgo imported about 165 million barrels of oil. Each barrel can be used to produce about 19.5 gallons of gasoline. With the number of barrels of oil Citgo imported, it could produce about 77 million barrels of gasoline, about 3% of US consumption. At capacity, it could produce about 4.5%

Citgo is associated with about 145,000 stations, which I mentioned previously were independently owned, meaning Citgo doesn't own them. If Citgo were running at capacity within the US, it could produce about 383,000 barrels of gasoline per day or around 110 gallons of gasoline per station per day. Now, I've worked at some very low volume stations. The smallest volume of gasoline any of them ever sold was 400 gallons in a 24 hour period. Some averaged in excess of 16,000 gallons per day during the summer.

I suggest no conclusion with this. I simply want to offer the data and allow others to draw their own conclusions regarding the depth to which you're helping the poor by patronizing Citgo.

But wait, there's more.

Citgo fully owns some relatively small refineries in Illinois, Texas, and Louisiana. These account for roughly half the Citgo interested refining capacity. The other half is included in Citgo's 41% interest in the massive Lyondell-Citgo refinery in Houston that everyone was worried about this past fall when the hurricanes were battering the coast. The controlling interest in this company is maintained by Lyondell Chemical Company. Lyondell has a PAC. Let's explore some of its contributions in the last few year:

These could be good, depending on your perspective:

Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte, Washington $2,500
Democratic State Senate Campaign Cmte, Harrisburg, $1,000

What about these?

Friends of Jeff Piccola Committee, Harrisburg, PA $500
FRIENDS OF JEFF PICCOLA COMMITTEE, HARRISBURG, PA $1,000
FUND FOR A CONSERVATIVE FUTURE PAC, ALEXANDRIA, VA $5,000
HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, HARRISBURG, P $1,000 (Annual contribution)
House Republican Campaign Committee, Harrisburg, P $1,000
HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, HARRISBURG, P $700 (Annual contribution)
House Republican Campaign Committee, Harrisburg, P $500
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, WASHINGT $15,000 (Annual contribution)

I could go on with individuals, such as contributions to Rick Santorum and Tom Delay, but I won't bother.

And here's the point, since I'm sure you think I've run astray. All these companies have connections among themselves. They compete for resources but they also cooperate to try to leverage their position. If you support one, you support them all. If you purchase Citgo products directly, you will be supporting the Lyondell-Citgo refinery's operations and Lyondell every bit as much (more based on percentage of ownership) as Citgo, which means, using your own logic, that you're supporting these donations to such odious causes as the "Fund for a Conservative Future."

I don't mind being wrong and will readily admit to being wrong if I am, but this empty cheer-leading of Citgo by people who seem not to understand or have a desire to understand how the energy business works and then jump all over my ass when I try to provide a little valid information is getting more than tiresome. I'm all for giving Citgo as much business as you can, just be educated about what exactly you're doing when you do it.

(All data and information comes from browsing opensecrets.org, doe.gov, and citgo.com. Large numbers have been rounded, resulting in some variations that may not add up exactly when we get into the realm of millions and billions.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Green Mountain Dem Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOW..that's a lot of....
info to digest and I really appreciate all of your effort in providing it for our consumption. Vermont is a "heavy" Citgo user state and I am a regular Citgo user as my only other choice is Exxon-Mobil! I totally agree with your points about the energy business and I know that NONE of them can be considered a good guy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmm, interesting
I'll have to check it out a little further. It looks like you did your homework. I'm one of the people who buy Citgo all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Please do ...

It's been a very long time since I've dug into it this deeply, so I am fully prepared for error. I will admit I am not entirely certain of the numbers associated with imports by Citgo. One set of data made it seem as though the import levels were calculated with Lyondell-Citgo separate from Citgo Petroleum as a whole. Another set with more detail made it seem as though the numbers for Citgo Petro were an overall import number and those of Lyondell-Citgo a subset of that. I went with this because of the greater detail and because the resulting product fit better with the overall capacity of Citgo refineries.

If the former is true, you can bump the numbers imports to about 122 million barrels and work from there. This doesn't materially change anything, however, with regard to any potential conclusions one might draw. Citgo refineries still do not and cannot produce enough gasoline to supply all the stations with the Citgo logo, meaning other oil companies profit more overall from purchases at Citgo stations when considered as a whole to a greater degree than Citgo does.

And FWIW, I once purchased from Citgo all the time, in part because it was the only credit card I had.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bummers! I do buy Citgo..
and had hoped it was Venezuelan oil but it's also the only full serve in town and I like my gas pumped for me.

Hope I'm not being too picky for you but when you "don" a flame-suit..you "don" one. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Pick away ...

That irritates me too, but I get sloppy when I write long posts. Some subconsious part of me takes over. Anyway. Correction noted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What about losing all Venesulean oil as Chavesz has said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Very interesting
thanks for posting all of this info.

I drive a diesel and use biodiesel. The station I use, I'm not really sure where the regular dino #2 diesel comes from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berserker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I often see this type of post
but I usually don't add to them. I believe that most people think a logo on a gas station is the type of fuel they are getting like Citgo. If that were true then Citgo would have to have a separate pipeline coming from the gulf going to the refinery in your area and then refine that oil and then have their own trucks deliver that same oil to the station with their logo on it. This is not how it works. Most all fuel in your area comes from the SAME refinery some brands just put different additives in and then they call it theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecoalex Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. What about losing all Venesulean oil as Chavez has said? Impact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Major impact ...
The immediate impact would be the near shutdown of Lyondell-Citgo, at least for a time, since Venezuela provides this refinery with the majority of its crude supplies. The more interesting question would be what impact such an action would have on the operation in the long term. I have no idea what sort of agreement exists between Citgo and Lyondell Chemical, but whatever it is, I am quite certain removing supply would create some very nasty legal problems. Remember that just the possibility this refinery might be impacted by a hurricane caused a major spike in oil and gasoline prices. Citgo's other refineries get oil from various places, so they would likely still be operational, particularly in Illinois, assuming Chavez doesn't order the US subsidiary to cease all operations, but they would be affected as well.

And this starts a chain reaction. Anyone that is supplied by these refineries would have to find supply elsewhere. A BP station might get its gasoline from a Citgo refinery very close to it. If the Citgo refinery isn't producing or isn't producing enough to supply that station with its needs, it has to go elsewhere, to a refinery farther away, increasing the cost of transportation, putting pressure on supply, causing price spikes all over the board. At some point, the cost of supplying the gasoline becomes greater than the return on it, and stations end up not being supplied on a regular enough schedule to keep them operating, if they are supplied at all. The shortages that took place in various parts of the country after Katrina didn't occur because the gasoline wasn't there. They occurred because it cost too much to move them where they needed to go with all the damage to the transportation infrastructure. Shutting down refineries that are lacking supply has a similar effect.

Refineries produce a lot of products other than gasoline, so even forgetting that for a moment, you're looking at shortages that would impact every industry in the US. Remembering gasoline supplies, you're talking about a sudden 3% drop in gasoline supplies, which is nothing to sneeze at since even tiny fluctuations in supply can create enormous reverberations throughout the entire economy. Whatever is lost from one supplier has to be acquired through another.

But this is only tangentially related to my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-18-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. thanks for the info on this
It makes sense that Venezuela wouldn't be able to really produce that much oil for the US.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. Here is a chart of the most socially responsible oil companies:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC