Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Whose idea was it to have a private company hold election results?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:09 PM
Original message
Whose idea was it to have a private company hold election results?
This seems like an incredibly bad idea. Allowing a private company to run election machines AND RETAIN ELECTION RESULTS. If this is legal, WHY is it legal?

Seems to me election results should be under the care of a trusted public entity, if there are any left in America today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it was the winners of the last 3 or 4 elections
The very ones who's friends own the private companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thefloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Facists
enough said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who said that it was legal?? They just decided to do it, same as
the illegal wiretapping... they just frigging decided to do it because they feel that no one can stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Remember this? P-R-I-V-I-T-I-Z-A-T-I-O-N?
Once the Republicans took office, privitization was suppose to make things cheaper for us. Of course it isn't cheaper. But it's a nifty way to filter public money to cronies, and it is also a nice place to hide secrets and do things outside of the public sunshine laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. GOP, they love privatization
more efficient*, don't you know... :eyes:

And, hey, why bother to make them prove their product does what they claim. Let's just trust them! Why would they lie?


*efficient in this case meaning being able to have elite corporate interests rake a profit off the top of a service where there is no competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Now which party thinks everything needs to be Privatized hmmmmmm
lets see could it be RE-PUB-LIC-ANS? Who's ideal is that the Government has no business in funding anything except wars and corporate america? Hmmmmmm lets see, Could it be RE-PUB-LIC-ANS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Umm, as I recall...
... Bob Ney (R-CORRUPT), was the principal sponsor of HAVA. Since both Ney and Diebold are from Ohio, it's not too hard to see how electronic machines became dominant because of the way HAVA was written....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Juicy articles on Ney, links below
Edited on Tue Feb-07-06 08:30 PM by MissWaverly
Nonetheless, Ney received $56,500 from the lobbyists and their tribal clients from 2001 to 2004, the same time period that he is alleged to have engaged in actions favorable to Abramoff's purchase of the SunCruz casinos. (Washington Post, 1/4/06; Bloomberg, 11/22/05; Columbus Dispatch, 1/3/06)
http://www.ourfuture.org/issues_and_campaigns/accountablecongress/ney/rapsheet.cfm

The Soon-to-be-Indicted Rep. Bob Ney of Ohio's Connection To Electoral Fraud
The Dots Connect Between Abramoff, Ohio 2004 Election Smokescreen and Ney's Former Staffer Revealed to be on Diebold's Payroll While Working for White House Law Firm
All the While as HAVA -- America's 'Election Reform' Bill -- is Used for Political Payoff in the Bargain...

http://htdaw.blogsource.com/post.mhtml?post_id=180444

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-07-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's gotta be the repukes
After all, they love to keep the truth from the American people. They're the fascist bastards who think corporate power trumps democracy itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC