Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House tightens oversight of pages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:42 PM
Original message
House tightens oversight of pages
House tightens oversight of pages
By Johanna Neuman, Times Staff Writer
9:32 AM PST, January 19, 2007

WASHINGTON -- Four months after a congressional page scandal rocked Capitol Hill and dashed Republicans' hopes for holding their majorities in Congress, the House voted unanimously today to require regular meetings of an expanded board that oversees the teenage interns.

The House voted 416-0 to recompose the board with three congressional members from each party, a parent and a former page. The new eight member board would be responsible for overseeing 70 pages — usually 16-year-olds who apply for a highly competitive program to spend a year running errands for members of Congress and their staffs, while attending school in the nation's capital.

Sexually explicit e-mails from Rep. Mark Foley (R-Fla.) to several former male pages he had met as chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children were disclosed in September. In the ensuing scandal, Foley resigned. The House Ethics Committee launched an investigation into why Foley's friendly behavior toward the pages went undetected.

The House Ethics Committee, in its report on the Foley case, said that former House chief clerk Jeff Trandahl warned Rep. John Shimkus (R-Ill.), then chairman of the page board, that Foley was a "ticking time bomb" who had been confronted repeatedly about his conduct.

[email protected]

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-ex-pages19jan20,0,2555095.story

Amazing how those repukes couldn't be bothered to fix this before, yet can vote for it now. Shameless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. They sort of had to
anyone who voted against this would be considered to be a pervert, or someone shielding a pervert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-19-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMO, the page program should be eliminated. Those young people should not be
exposed to the corruption and hateful discord of congress. It is not healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC