Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reps Bilbray & Rohrbacher (R-Ca) & Poe(R-Tx) Rip * Over Border Patrol Incident--* Backs Drug Dealers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:48 PM
Original message
Reps Bilbray & Rohrbacher (R-Ca) & Poe(R-Tx) Rip * Over Border Patrol Incident--* Backs Drug Dealers
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 06:56 PM by wordpix
not two border patrol agents who shot at border dealers and are now in jail, with a drug dealer getting immunity to testify against the agents. Judge/jury gave 11-12 years to each agent.

55 Congressmen including R's sent letter to * on behalf of border agents. (Tony Snowjob says letter "nonsensical"). No response to Congressmen from Maladministration.

Basically, BushCo is defending drug dealers coming over border, while 2 border agents who shot at the dealers are put in jail without bail.

BushCo is now being very transparent about the fact they're shielding drug dealers and Repubs are ripped! :wow: I believe this will help us bring * down; he is either totally insane or VERY DEEP into drug dealing. Or both. :grr:

This is on Lou Dobbs---CNN.

Even Ed Rollins is saying Dimson will pay for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I saw something about this on Lou Dobbs.
(I only had it on CNN because I was setting up my new TV, I don't watch Lou Dobbs)

And they were blathering on about how Bush should pardon these two border guards. Apparently they shot some Mexicans, then covered it up, and then rightly went to jail.

So why shouldn't they be in jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. agents were pursuing dealers on the border---the Congressmen were focused on that
There hasn't been much about a coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. They shot people, and didn't file any report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. they shot drug dealers with $1 million in drugs, not just "people"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Are you familiar with the Constitution?
It says everybody has a right to a trial. Even drug dealers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I don't think our borders should be overrun by drug dealers allowed to just waltz in
with $1 million in drugs.

Personally, I am for legalizing most drugs but why are our border agents being prosecuted for doing their jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, that's great.
I don't think law enforcement should just be allowed to shoot people and walk away with it.

"Personally, I am for legalizing most drugs but why are our border agents being prosecuted for doing their jobs?"

If they'd done their jobs, they wouldn't be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. apparently that area has had some violent incidents and on the Mexican side, officials who
prosecute drug dealers are murdered. Obviously, things are tense on the border, at least in this part of TX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oooh, my, well that changes everything!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. you might not see it but something smells here---read the links
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. the Mexicans are drug dealers bringing in $1 million worth of drugs---& * prosecutes the border agen
ts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Makes me uneasy.
Is he really this sloppy and stupid or are we more helpless than we realize and he knows it.

Just a sickening thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Illegal drugs and illegal workers are a two-fer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burnsey_Koenig Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. So Much more to it than you and Dobbs suggest....
The officers didn't follow protocal, didn't file a report and broke many regulations and violated a Supreme Court Directive. AND they were convicted by a JURY in TEXAS. Read the whole story. I am not defending the decision, but the LAW applies to everyone, not just those we wish it applied to. Do you really want the police to be shooting people in the back as they flee from a crime scene? Yeah, shoot em down in the streets, or in the dessert. And if you don't like this law, then somone needs to take it up with the Supremes...


The commotion and multiple calls for back up had brought seven other agents – including two supervisors – to the crossing by this time. Compean picked up his shell casings, but Ramos did not. He also did not follow agency procedure and report that he had fired his weapon.

"The supervisors knew that shots were fired," Ramos told the paper. "Since nobody was injured or hurt, we didn't file the report. That's the only thing I would've done different."


Had he done that one thing differently, it's unlikely it would have mattered to prosecutors.

More than two weeks after the incident, Christopher Sanchez, an investigator with the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General, received a call from a Border Patrol agent in Wilcox, Ariz. The agent's mother-in-law had received a call from Aldrete-Davila's mother in Mexico telling her that her son had been wounded in the buttocks in the shooting.....

At trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney Debra Kanof told the court that the agents had violated an unarmed Aldrete-Davila's civil rights.

"The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled it is a violation of someone's Fourth Amendment rights to shoot them in the back while fleeing if you don't know who they are and/or if you don't know they have a weapon," said Kanof.

Kanof dismissed Ramos' testimony that he had seen something shiny in the smuggler's hand, saying that the agent couldn't be sure it was a gun he had seen.

Further, Kanof argued, it was a violation of Border Patrol policy for agents to pursue fleeing suspects.
"Agents are not allowed to pursue. In order to exceed the speed limit, you have to get supervisor approval, and they did not," she told the Daily Bulletin.


Those shell casings Compean picked up were described to the jury as destroying the crime scene and their failure to file an incident report – punishable by a five-day suspension, according to Border Patrol regulations – an attempted cover up.

The Texas jury came back with a guilty verdict. Conviction for discharging a firearm in relation to a crime of violence has an automatic 10-year sentence. The other counts have varying punishments.

"How are we supposed to follow the Border Patrol strategy of apprehending terrorists or drug smugglers if we are not supposed to pursue fleeing people?" said Ramos, who noted that he only did on that day what he had done for the previous 10 years. "Everybody who's breaking the law flees from us. What are we supposed to do? Do they want us to catch them or not?"

He also noted that none of the other agents who had responded to the incident filed reports that shots were fired and, besides, both supervisors at the scene knew they had discharged their weapons.

"You need to tell a supervisor because you can't assume that a supervisor knows about it," Kanof countered. "You have to report any discharge of a firearm."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burnsey_Koenig Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Here is link....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. thanks for this--the agents don't get a mistrial declared when 3 jurors were coerced into guilty
Edited on Wed Jan-17-07 07:15 PM by wordpix
votes?

snip: U.S. District Court Judge Kathleen Cardone in El Paso, Texas, sentenced Jose Alonso Compean to 12 years in prison and Ignacio Ramos to 11 years and one day despite a plea by their attorney for a new trial after three jurors said they were coerced into voting guilty in the case, the Washington Times reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Didn't Bush pardon about 5 drug dealers around Christmas time?
I can't say I know for sure how big or small these drug dealers were. I think, however, that he even arranged to have the sentence commuted of a convicted methamphetamine dealer who happens to be an attorney working for a company that is a major contributor to the Republican Party.

And I think his father George H.W. Bush pardoned a Pakistani heroin dealer named Aslam Adam shortly before his presidential term ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burnsey_Koenig Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. yea he pardoned them AFTER their sentance was served
so all it did was remove it from their records. He never released them from jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Thanks for the info -
and welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-18-07 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. That's not quite correct - he commuted one sentence
In the case of the individual that Bush pardoned who was found guilty of selling methamphetimine, Bush commuted his sentence. That means, he reduced the total possible sentence of the individual. A commutation means that the individual did not serve his entire time. Phillip Anthony Emmert was sentenced in December, 1992 to 22 years in prison and was due for release in 2011 (sentence reduced by 3 years in 1996).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. yes, CNN reported that he did pardon 5 dealers---that should go over big with the fundies
who love their born again pRes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. Might the jurors have been frightened?
The WND article, admittedly a suspect source, said that Ramos had increased security around his home because there were concerns that associates of the injured individual might engage in some vigilante justice of their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I guess anyone would be frightened trying to stop drug dealers bringing in $1 million worth of drugs
into the US.

These guys are not just petty dealers, dealing a few ozs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-17-07 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I sure would be. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC