|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 10:57 AM Original message |
Poll question: Impeachment Question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Somebody posted that Conyers said they did not have the votes for impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Have you seen the Lapham piece? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 06:11 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. Believe whatever you like. Pelosi will control the agenda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 06:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. See this shows how really stupid the non-argument becomes...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 09:32 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I certainly wish I could better understand what your cryptic one-liners mean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 10:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. No actually you are in the "Wishful Thinking" category, hoping that all your negative assumptions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 10:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. How is it an assumption to say that past impeachments were the result of ongoing investigations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 10:59 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. See #12 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 12:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. If they intend to investigate, why does Madame Speaker say "Impeachment is off the table"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 06:03 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. It is possible to have investigations outside of impeachment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 06:57 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. So predicting the outcome makes no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 09:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. The point is that you investigate first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 03:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Right, impeachment without investigations will ultimately fail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 06:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Remember a year ago when all the cries were of a "Happy Fitzmas!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
2. Actually I was raised to believe this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-19-06 01:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. That's why the reality today is a "Reverse Clinton" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
5. Avoiding War Criminal Status for Oneself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 01:53 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. LL: "a predatory government...stealing from a free but inattentive people" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-18-06 03:21 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I love (and hate) that line. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 16th 2024, 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC