Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FOX News reporter Major Garrett reports the neurosurgeons will NOT comment on Johnson operation.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:07 PM
Original message
FOX News reporter Major Garrett reports the neurosurgeons will NOT comment on Johnson operation.
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 12:30 PM by Radio_Lady
There are no plans to discuss his condition, treatment, and prognosis.
This is highly unusual in high profile operations. For goodness sake, we got to hear about Terri Schiavo every day.

I am furious. What is going on at this Washington DC hospital?

Garrett stated he was NOT ALLOWED in the Starbucks located in the hospital because he is with the media!

I don't like this at all.

On edit: FOX had a neurosurgeon who agreed this is a developing situation -- there could be more bleeding -- they need time to even evaluate his condition.

I guess I'm just used to doctors doing news conferences immediately after important operations.

It is the age of INSTANT INFORMATION and when it doesn't happen, I find it suspicious. I'll try to ease up on that feeling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. uh..... HIPAA????
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. "No comment" on high profile patients has been in place
since the mid 60s when I started in healthcare.

If the family doesn't want reporters to know all the details, the hospital, physicians, nurses, and other personnel will not divulge them.

HIPAA refers more to information sharing with insurance companies and other outside facilities. It just codified what most of us were already doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's not entirely accurate
HIPAA certainly has sections devoted specifically to privacy issues relating to PHI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, HIPAA changed the landscape.
I'd expect to see this stuff only in medical journals, if at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That wouldn't be kosher with HIPAA either
since it wouldn't be anonymous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Some aspects probably could be reported anonymously.
But, I'll leave it at that. If I was a doctor or read medical journals personally I would have specific knowledge. I mean, on the face of it, I have no idea how medical journals manage at all, post-HIPAA. It's not my trade so I'll have to live with ignorance in this matter.

Best wishes for the Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They manage fine
as long as informed consent is obtained using proper HIPAA guidelines, there's no problem using that data in a journal article. There are IRBs (Institutional Review Boards) at every clinical research site to provide oversight to make sure that the privacy rights of research participants are being maintained at all times.

I can tell you that it's a heck of a lot of extra paperwork and makes study design more difficult and perhaps slightly less powerful, but it's also obviously a good thing.

In any case, there are far fewer case studies in medical journals nowadays than there used to be--primarily because of the the anonymity issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sir_captain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. You have no right to be so furious
Regardless of the fact that the man is a senator, he has the same right to privacy that anyone else has. I am sure that when there is something important to report, he or his family will make a statement. Until then, be thankful that your own medical records are subject to the same privacy his are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Even a US Senator has the right to keep medical information

private. Many people would like to know but HIPPA applies to all. I certainly wish to know all I can about Sen. Johnson's condition but if it is his wish to not release all the information for the country to discuss, I can respect that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Imagine the zoo if the reporters were allowed in.
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 12:18 PM by Straight Shooter
They would be grabbing everybody, asking questions, and speculation would be running rampant. It would change the atmosphere of the hospital and make everyone tense, and I don't think that's a good thing for Senator Johnson nor his caretakers.

Then of course there is the privacy issue, and also that no one really knows for certain anything at this point. I would not be willing to comment one way or the other, with so much at stake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. i think this is good. (to keep it low keyed for now-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-14-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks, everyone! I'm going to brew some chamomile tea and put on soothing music...
Edited on Thu Dec-14-06 12:37 PM by Radio_Lady
Weather outside is frightful.
School lockdown in New Jersey
Hikers still missing in Oregon
Senator Johnson has surgery in Washington, DC
Report: Princess Diana's death in 1997 termed an accident, but family says they don't agree.
Terrorists in Great Britain go uncharged -- was all of this seizure of "liquids and gels" emphasis on flights even necessary?

Happy Holidays -- I definitely need to chill out..................

Jon Stewart's writers have a lot to do today!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC