Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official Thread #1 of the Gates confirmation hearing--CSPAN 2 now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:51 AM
Original message
Official Thread #1 of the Gates confirmation hearing--CSPAN 2 now
I'll start this ball, but don't know how long I'll be able to keep it in the air. It's finals time and I've got to get this takehome exam done. Period.

Pitch in everyone.

Warner and Levin are giving opening statements now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Levin - "finds Gates' response to pre-hearing questions
reassuring" - despite the fact that he voted against Gates for CIA director in 91' since he thought that Gates was "less than candid about his role in Iran-Contra"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Warner looks like someone slugged him in his left eye.
What's up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Levin mentioned his Iran-Contra involvement concerns and said
that he's willing to give him a fresh new and fair hearing regarding Iraq. Said that in the prehearing questions, Gates had promised that budget requests would be made inside the regular budget process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Iran/Contra, BNL, BCCI, Kissinger Associates-Bobby is associated
Edited on Tue Dec-05-06 10:19 AM by bobthedrummer
with lots of things BFEE, and Levin shouldn't let this pass without serious questioning. Hopefully this will occur later.

The late Texas Dem. Cong. Henry Gonzalez wanted to impeach 41, and he had this damning indictment read into The Congressional Record, it is pertinent to this hearing.
http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/congress/1991/h910502g.htm

At about the same time that Kissinger Associates was involved with BNL, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Poppy, Eagleburger, Gates, Baker, Casey, Reagan, Meese et al there was BCCI and Kissinger Associates as Senator Kerry and others are fully aware of
http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/20kiss.htm

L. Paul Bremer, the Coalition Provisional Authority of Iraq's head was Henry Kissinger's chief of staff at one time.

So if a citizen like little old me is aware of stuff like this-why don't the newly elected leaders and old hands like Levin air this stuff out and shut the door on Bobby Gates and all the rest of these BFEE perps???

Gates "promises" are worthless.

edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. That's always my question. If somone like me knows this guy
is dirty, what is this hearing about? Is it just CSPAN Theater? Senator Byrd gets to be strict and thump his Constitution but then -- what? This guy is confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. You've just described "government in action"
:(

As we know it anyway...

Sad init?

When thugs have a revolving door - they will continue to come right back in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. We have to send the "cspan theater' idea to Jon Stewart.
Because you hafta laugh. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #45
48.  We should send it. Beats crying, sfexpat2000
We'd be crying 24/7 otherwise if it weren't for the release of laughter...even bitter laughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #48
56. You're not going to believe this one. Stuff like this can't be made up.
Before he left the UN, Bolton blocked a measure to celebrate THE END OF SLAVERY in this hemisphere.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. Oh, I believe it. Sadly - it's easy to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #31
55. Collectively we are what they fear the most-the truth, so they try to isolate US
ignore US, discredit US, even kill US as an "example"-none of this works anymore as the truth is shared about these "elite" traitors and criminals and their "assets and properties" of a corrupt powerful yet failed empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. thanks for starting this skidmore...
I have it on...Bob Dole speaking now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bob Dole up now giving the nomination of Gates.
Viagra must have given him the day off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. MSNBC also has live coverage n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Why Bob and not Elizabeth?
:puke: They both make me ill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Perhaps after her wonderful job as 2004 RSCC, they're not letting her do anything.
Senator Liddy is my senator. She's pretty useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Plus that glorious smackdown she got on the Senate floor
just before the election probably reduced her fan club a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Gates has been asked about Schultz accusation that the CIA
manipulated intelligence and about Gates' work there. Gates is basically blaming all that on bad blood between Casey and Schultz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. McCain up now.
Be prepared for a campaign speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Wants to increase size of army
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:43 AM
Original message
Oh yeah- he's swinging for the fences like it's campaign time.
:puke:

He makes me angry. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. A CIA insider's take on Gates - for the record?
Gates has primarily two things going for him, which hardly suffice to justify confirmation:

• The Anyone-But-Rumsfeld syndrome, which has understandable appeal. Just how much appeal was brought home to me last week, when a former colleague who worked closely with Gates during Iran-Contra said, ``Despite my misgivings, I would support Satan himself in preference to Rumsfeld.''

• The Not-Enough-Evidence-To-Indict bromide offered reluctantly by Lawrence Walsh, the independent counsel who led the investigation of the Iran-Contra affair. Walsh was frustrated by Gates' remarkable inability to recall explosive information that his subordinates swore under oath they had told him ''about Oliver North's illegal activities,'' for example. (Gates' supporters still brag about his ''eidetic memory.'') Walsh wrote
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1204-31.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
86. You nailed it - Dems who want withdrawal are being assured that is what Gates will do
behind the scenes.

What are you going to do, when your greatest goal for now is withdrawal?

Just hope the next Dem administration isn't inclined to coverup for Bush2 the way the past one did for Bush1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. I wish someone
would just pull the plug on the Bushes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Gates is open to increasing the "end strength" of the military--
increasing the size of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. he said we're "not winning" in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Kennedy up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Interestingly warm- but cold as ice at the same time.
He's letting it out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. He's asking a loyal foot soldier in the BFEE if he'll stand up
against the Emporer if need be.

A lie is being told now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. McCain certainly didn't ask any questions, but did try to make his
campaign speech. Let's hope the rest of the presidential hopefuls don't do that...I want this guy questioned strongly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I agree. This type of grandstanding is why we got into the war to
begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. "an individual tragedy for those that were killed"
Is that what he just said? That it was a tragedy for those who were killed? Like they will be able to overcome it?

I have never heard anyone speak like that of anyone that has died. So now, we are just marking "individual tragedies" and not deaths?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Little Boots must have written the talking points all by himself with
his superdooper magic crayon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. some history on Gates
Edited on Tue Dec-05-06 10:54 AM by pberq
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
A CIA insider's take on Gates
BY RAY MCGOVERN

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/opinion/16158060.htm

<snip>
The Armed Services Committee's ranking member, Carl Levin, D-Mich., who voted against Gates' nomination in 1991 to be director of the CIA, said he wanted to give Gates a ''fresh look; a lot of time has passed.'' Well, highly damaging evidence has come to light since 1991, implicating Gates in some of the most serious national-security scandals of the 1980s. Veteran investigative reporter Robert Parry, for one, has been providing chapter and verse on Consortiumnews.com.

For example, in January 1995, Howard Teicher, who served on President Reagan's National Security Council staff, submitted a sworn affidavit detailing the activities of Gates and his then-boss, CIA Director William Casey, in secretly providing arms to Iraq. This violated the Arms Export Control Act in two ways: ignoring the requirement to notify Congress; and providing arms to a state designated as a sponsor of terrorism.

It gets worse. To grease the skids for this dubious adventure, Gates ordered his more malleable subordinates at the CIA to cook up intelligence reports to provide some comfort to Reagan in acquiescing to these activities. A National Intelligence Estimate of May 1985 predicted Soviet inroads in Iran if the United States did not reach out to ''moderates'' within the Iranian leadership.

In addition, Gates' analysts were pressed to publish several reports beginning in late 1985 -- as HAWK anti-aircraft missiles wended their way to Tehran -- that Iranian-sponsored terrorism had ''dropped off substantially.'' There was no persuasive evidence to support that judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
81. yep, that be him
do we really need another liar and crook making policy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
25. Inhofe: no mass graves going on now.
ummmm- how many people die per day in iraq- civilians, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. But they're not below ground so they don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. ohhhhhh. My bad. I forgot that part...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. Has any of these Senators asked how many Iran Contra felons
are left on the bench?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
29. Woohoo! Senator Byrd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Asking if Gates supports an attack on Iran.
Gates saying he supports diplomacy and counsels against military action unless as a last resort. Says the same about Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. that sounds like a very dangerous non-answer
given the current rhetoric by Ahmadinijad (sp). Gates would have no say in diplomatic negotions with either Iran or Syria, that's State's job. He didn't say whether or not he agreed with the administration's policy (or lack thereof).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. yeah, he's doing the "slippery eel" routine.
Not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. cutting to the chase...
He has touched on the "secret agenda", perhaps??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Asking about Osama bin Laden - still on the loose
who is responsible for 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. That was great- asking who was more of a threat- saddam or OBL!
Edited on Tue Dec-05-06 11:09 AM by ncrainbowgrrl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. Good questions, Senator Byrd.
Gates thinks it important to "keep him on the run". Curious choice of words, isn't it? Why not just catch him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. GMTA Skidmore
I just posted about that too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. I'm sure he can "run" far- being injured or ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'm listening but I'm doing more snarling than anything
I can't see Gates without snarling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
40. Osama must be a champion marathoner by now
Gates wants to "keep him on the run". Sounds like keep him in the wings, just in case they need him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. I was thinking "keep him on ice" rather than keeping him "on the run"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
44. Want to "get down" to my level? ...try the truth
but the truth first requires knowing telling it is thousands upon thousands of steps up from Gates'level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
46. Roberts just wants Gates to scare the populace, once again. He's
using the fear factor to make his point. Won't they ever learn?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
47. What is Robert's "blue card" all about?
Does he hold someone's proxy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #47
52. 'Caterpillar' Roberts showing everyone his Heavy Equipment
Operators License to bring in the earthmovers, to bury the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
49. Oh great, here comes joementum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
50. "How to succeed in Iraq" (Lieberman)
Anyone...anyone...speaking of Iraq in terms of "winning" or "succeeding" is a liar. Just simply a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
51. Fuck the so-called "war on terror" - let's have a war on fear mongers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #51
57. I said the same thing a few minutes ago out loud here. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
53. Lieberman grates on my very last nerve
You just know there's a hand up his ass that reaches all the way to the Whitehouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #53
63. Holy Joe's appeal to "bi-partisanship"...
is extremely nauseating when he wishes for everyone to "join hands" in a lie and deception and try to make chicken salad out of chicken shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #63
68. Well said!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
54. I always love hearing Holy Joe's "Kumbuya" moment in every
"speech" he makes. He's going to be the uniter, not the divider. GAG!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
59. Sessions...I spoke to those who lost their lives.... Is he a medium? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. I was laughing out loud when I heard him say that.
Sessions is dumber than dirt and twice as dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. LMAO I know!
Edited on Tue Dec-05-06 11:31 AM by Solly Mack
Delusional ain't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. I was on the phone and was thankfully spared hearing that
I don't know why their crap still amazes me, but it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #59
71. I just sprayed diet coke on the monitor when I heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #71
82. As long as it wasn't your keyboard! Laughing here! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
60. No- they don't let you in their classrooms because you're a thug
who would teach students to be as corrupt as they need to be...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
65. Amazing how all these Repukes have suddenly seen the light and
feel so strongly that we now need to have more bipartisanship in order to get things done. They all think they have gotten away from that, and it's time to return.

Gosh, I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Yup. I was going to post that.
It was nice to see Sessions with his shoulders hunched and looking defensive for a change though instead of doing that annoying little rat terrier yipping he usually does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
66. Don't fucking tell me..a military spouse - what you owe me
Let me tell you what you owe me and my family

You owe us the truth
You owe us an apology
You owe us to withdraw from Iraq - a country you had no business sending troops to to begin with
You owe us to send the war criminal executive to prison
You owe us to never again abuse the military for the profits of the few

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
69. Reality check here..Will anyone ask him about his filthy hands in Iran-Contra?
I can't believe that these criminals become so easily re-invented...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
70. "could" become worse? "could" become worse?
Congress needs to suit up and spend a month in Iraq as a soldier. They need to garner a much needed perspective. Better yet, spend a month in Iraq as an Iraqi citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
72. did he just call Akaka "Senator Caca"?
:rofl: I must be losing it, but I didn't hear the A there at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #72
73. lol! I heard Caca too! I'd rofl but my colon isn't working on my keyboard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #72
85. I heard that too
And then thought of all the trouble that similar sounding words have caused in the past year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
74. Notice all the "fresh eyes" references that keep going on?
That Heritage Center guy on Washington Journal this morning kept referring to it too and he had been involved with this Iraq Commission too. He referred to the Commission as a "creature of the Congress." These people have seen that report. This hearing is a formaility to allow them to rubberstamp a commission report and make like they've done something bipartisan around this war.

Kumbayah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
75. Graham makes me sick
They almost always give him and Sessions the job of stirring the hate, and he relishes in it much too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. he is playing attorney
:puke:

I hate him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
77. Graham spoon feeds Gates
Hit those talking points!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
78. CSPAN 2 left live coverage so that loses me.
I have dialup and streaming doesn't always work well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #78
83. It's on C-SPAN 3- perhaps it'll work for you?
Worth a try, i guess...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
79. Gates : "No new ideas on Iraq"
"....putting pieces together from various ideas/groups"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
80. link to list of recent DU discussions on Gates-- last night there were NONE up top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
84. Thanks Skid - I was out for a couple hours and missed it.
Appreciate the thread for catch up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
87. are they coming back after lunch?
I know they're wrapping up for now, but is this it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Yes, around 2:15.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #88
89. hm, think i will show up for the 2nd round.
Has Ted had a go at them yet? Crap, there's nobody interesting on the Armed Services committee....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
91. Coming back into session! KICK!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-05-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
92. Locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC