Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bolton Held Up U.N. Anti-Slavery Measure (thank god he's leaving!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 04:00 PM
Original message
Bolton Held Up U.N. Anti-Slavery Measure (thank god he's leaving!)
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002070.php

Departing Bolton Held Up Anti-Slavery Measure
By Justin Rood - December 4, 2006, 10:27 AM
Ah, the Man with the Iron Mustache is leaving the international arena -- but not before attempting a thoroughly embarrassing and wholly unsympathetic maneuver.

Less than two weeks before the White House announced his resignation, Ambassador John Bolton's U.N. mission blocked an effort to celebrate the end of slavery in our hemisphere.

Next year marks the 200th anniversary of the abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. As far as anniversaries go, it seems like a good one to recognize, doesn't it? It should not be a real bone of contention to say that one is against slavery; and, upon hearing of the anniversary of its abolition in one region, to acknowledge that as a good thing; to recognize the cost of the practice in the millions of lives uprooted and forced into extreme suffering; and to celebrate the efforts which ended the horrific practice.

To do so, a number of Caribbean countries got together to propose a commemorative resolution before the United Nations.

Guess who refused to sign? That's right: Ambassador John Bolton's United States.

In a letter, the Bolton-led U.S. mission to the UN explained their objection to two words (the U.S. preferred "the emphasis" to "emphasizing") in the document. (You can read the document here.) After a couple dozen U.S. congresspeople kicked up a fuss -- most of them members of the Congressional Black Caucus -- the U.S. mission reportedly backed down, and consented to sign the document without their preferred language, according to sources close to the process.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bloody hell, he fussed about that? I would have countered thusly...
Instead of, "Recalling paragraphs 98-106 of the Durban Declaration and the emphasis in particular on the importance..." I'd have gone with, "...and the emphasis particularly on the importance..." just to piss Bolton off. Dude, John, who the fuck cares? Sign it and shut up. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC