Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK Solomon, what do you wish to do with this baby?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:46 AM
Original message
OK Solomon, what do you wish to do with this baby?
How do you decide who is the real Mother? Lay the baby gently down. Take an axe and cut it in half. And see which Mother will agree with your wise decision? And which half the other will take?

Is this not the present dilemma of the Democratic Party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, not exactly.
tenacity to remain in the party could just as easily be an indication of those who wish to subvert it to their own purposes.
If you're a republican shill, whose placement is intended to shift the party rightward so that it becomes irrelevant, you'll sit back
and stay no matter what happens, because you have a job to do.

However, if the shill suceeds and DOES render the party irrelevant and "republican lite", then people who finally leave might really be the real family of the party

so I reject your analogy on its premise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm open to better analogies...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KSLeftyMom Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Whoa, I'd never thought about that
Do you really think there are repuke "infiltrators" of sorts in our party? YIPES.

I don't want to split the democratic party -- but I do think we should remove the spineless wonders from office in 2006 and put in dems who are willing to donkey-kick the shit out of repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firefox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. No. Only now will we see the Big Picture paragraph unite us.
Edited on Tue Jan-31-06 11:48 AM by firefox
There is such a thing as a big picture. Ask people to write their big picture paragraphs and after they circulate you will see that a majority will agree with those that surface to the top.

Here is an example of a big picture paragraph.

We had a class war where 99% of the people didn't show up and that gave us Wealthy Rule. Puppet Bush represents a group of Empiring PNACers that have engaged the US in a mission of global domination that calls for the milary destruction of those in their way. They call for military supremacy forever, the sole militarization of space, and full spectrum dominance in all classes of weapons. Wealthy Rule has built the machinery of the nation to protect it and that includes the election system with the Largest Minority Rule and not requiring a paper trail on cast votes. It includes a media whose concentration into six powerful allies of Wealthy Rule came by design of a Congress loyal to Wealthy Rule. We are now seeing the Justice system turn to protect Wealthy Rule and their pursuit of Empire. The policy of prohibition was used to trample the Constitution and give us a police state. Wealthy rule is rule by treason. We need to restore the federal governments to a more perfect Union, and one that re-establish Justice, insures domestic Tranquility, provides for the common defense, promotes the general Welfare, and returns the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity. We need a Constitutional convention. We need to stop the Empire, end prohibition, and start the rematch on the class war we lost to Wealthy Rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-31-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And if a "Constitutional Convention" were organized
Who can say the 'new' constitution would not be written for the benefit of the 'Wealthy Rule'?

I do not see how organizing a 'constitutional convention' would do anything but solidify the 'Wealthy Rule'. We have a perfectly good constitution, what we need is the agents of the government be forced to follow the constitution we have. And for those agents that have violated the law, then they should be placed in jail for a very long time.

The constitution, specifically the Bill of Rights, spells out exactly the limits on what the agents of the government are permitted to do. And these agents have violated those limits, repeatedly. They deserve a lengthy 'time-out'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC