... there is an equal and opposite reaction."
Many of our Founders wrote that the system they created was designed to channel these competing forces to the common good.
When the likes of BushCo. emerges, it shouldn't surprise anyone that forces will coalesce to oppose them.
**************************************
"Okay. I did the reading."
You're a glutton for punishment!
"I was right about two things. First, Dresser Industries: I watched with great suspicion as Defense Secretary Cheney pushed privatization of military logistics. Then he became head of the leading logistics firm in the defense arena. Then in the 2004 vice-presidential debate, Edwards gibed him about how Cheney had done very well in the private sector, and Cheney retorted that the federal government had had nothing to do with that. By that time, the writing on the wall was so big that only those standing far enough back could read it.
And in fact, Dresser was a catalyst for your pursuit of justice."
Others who were singing from the "privatization hymnal" are equally culpable here. More on that to come, with indictments to follow, methinks.
"Second thing I was right about: you write splendidly, and my opinion of your command of language was increased significantly by reading through the filings. Some of my favorite sections (in addition to lines like 'flightless avian flu') included these:"
I'm delighted that you found the writing entertaining AND informative. I've heard similar comments from investigators.
'But frankly, I fear that the DOJ headquarters has been turned into the CYA branch of Vinson & Elkins' worldwide operations.'
Alberto Gonzales is unfit, in my view, to have anything at all to do with these investigations, given his ties to Vinson & Elkins and other key aspects; he should resign immediately after the elections, in my view:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales'My generation can sniff out bogus brand building like BS bloodhounds, and there's a funny smell coming from Mr. Snow's podium these days. Maybe it's just the temporary press quarters, but I don't think so. If you think of the two major parties as competing brands, Mr. Snow may wish to rethink his approach to building the brand he is paid to endorse, and lay off the infomercial shtick in favor of some facts. My generation can sniff out a cost-cutting recipe change in a favorite food product, and we can sniff out a principles-cutting recipe change in conservatism, too.'
Hey, Tony Snow isn't half as slick as they seem to think he is.
"Smith reminds Senators Warner and Allen that George Washington said: 'All obstructions to the execution of the Laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels, and modified by mutual interests. However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines, which have lifted them to unjust dominion. Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts'."
How can you go wrong quoting GW in favor of your position? LOL.
"Of course, as I'm sure you've heard, all this (to a Democrat gasping to breathe the fresh air of an unhooded democracy) seems to be too good to be true. As do you."
I refer you to the Third Law, above.
"But really, all that has happened in the last six years seems too bad to be true, so it doesn't really strain credulity all that much."
The truth, as they say, is quite often stranger than fiction.
Thanks for your kind words.
- Dave