Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CLINTON SUPPORTS FILIBUSTER!!!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:41 AM
Original message
CLINTON SUPPORTS FILIBUSTER!!!!!
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 09:45 AM by MassDemm
Just got off the phone with person in her DC office and she is voting no on cloture and supporting a filibuster!

edit as requested!

Yippeeeee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Get your butt up there NEXT to KERRY!!!!
Go Hiliary!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe she's paying attention.
Or maybe this is just more, as Molly Ivins would put it, "triangulation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. yeah, let's beat her up on this too, cuz Molly would want it. Freepers too
Your post reminds me of CNN's poll: "Why is kerry for fillibuster? Convictions or politics? See? You are almost as good as CNN.
I of course would have said "takes orders from Osama"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Even if she is "triangulating" then it's still good news
Pointing it out isn't necessarily bashing her. If she always plays it safe the fact that she thinks this is the safe option shows that she has reason to believe that this will be successful and that others will join her. If it's a politically prudent move to filibuster it shows that we are having an impact in supporting them. If Miss Flag-burning ammendment is on board it will happen. So I celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. I agree
I am really shocked quite personally. This must mean Kerry's filibustering is going well. I hope so anyway! Any word on Joe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
38. go Hillary!....
....filibuster Now, beat up later....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
44. I'll take Molly over Hillary any day.
Since you brought up Molly.

Just because someone's a Democrat, they don't automatically get my support. I have a problem with every Dem who voted yes on IWR. Many have since expressed their regret and that earns my respect. As far as I know, Hillary has not. Please correct me if I'm wrong and cite your source.

And, by the way, I also have a problem with every democrat who is not actively talking about impeachement... Hillary has lots of company in that group.

If there were more people like Molly talking straight, we would be much further along in terms of making things right. And if that means beating up Hillary and others, so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
30. Maybe
Maybe she's realizing what's going on and she's getting enough complaints. I'm glad to hear she's for a filibuster though! This is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
54. I will never understand this kind of thinking.
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 01:17 PM by AZBlue
First you (and that's you in the plural, not you specifically speedoo) bitch and moan about how awful (insert name here) is, what a DINO, what a sell-out, so Republican-lite, I can't believe there's a "D" after his/her name, I'll never ever support him/her, etc.

Then, they do or say something exactly in line with what you've been saying all along. Maybe they changed their mind, maybe there was a plan in place you didn't know about, maybe they found out more information, maybe they even read and listened to your post on DU.

So what do you do? You criticize and slam them. You look for some nefarious ulterior motive. You try to link it to a Republican plot or another conspiracy. Or something else. I'm not saying all these things are happening here in this thread or pointing this specifically at speedoo - again, this is a general post about this and other comments on DU.

Either these posters are so bitter that they can't even recognize a victory when they see it or they just want to complain, no matter what's going on. I just don't get either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Well, I have not been complaining about her ... much.
But if you don't "understand that kind of thinking" maybe you are not trying hard enough. My view of my Senator is that she simply does not do enough to fight the Coward and his misadministration. As a constituent, that's what I want her to do, and so far, she has come up way short.

Why was she not out front on the filibuster supporting Kerry immediately? Given her track record, I have my own conclusion, which is that she was calculating what would be best for HER, not for the country or her constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. OMFG!!!
Thank you, God/Goddess/Diety of your choice...

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Original message
Come on Hillary!
We're counting on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue2helix Donating Member (280 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent!
I Live in NYC and emailed her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. YAY!!!
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 09:45 AM by jsamuel
Thanks for the title change :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Original message
YES!!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. That's ONE point
in her favor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary!
Gore and Kerry keepin her real!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. If the filibuster has Hillary's support, we might be able to keep
Alito off the bench! Inspiration!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Now I'm close to certain the Dems are doing political calculation.
Okay, you vote vo, you vote yes...

Shucks, not enough. Sorry, no filibuster. But we tried, see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Epiphany4z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. ahhh good
seems calls and letters are working. YEEEEEEEEEeeeeAAAAAAAAAAAAA <--dean like yell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. She must've been waiting for Biden to screw up first. Oh well - Glad she's
on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. LOL
Isn't he out of the country? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11
33. CNN's Ed Henry says this is an opportunity for Kerry to energize base.
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 10:57 AM by flpoljunkie
Glad, too that Hillary is on board, but perhaps this is what is now motivating Hillary. Can't let Kerry get a leg up with the base.

We've got our work cut out for us, but it is a fight worth undertaking. Let's go down fighting!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. The funny thing is Kerry wanted someone else to do it, as he was scheduled
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 10:51 AM by blm
to be out of the country from Thursday thru Saturday. He cancelled the speech he was set to give in Ireland today at a very prestigious gathering.

Those who claim it's opportunism are full of crap - Kerry gave all the room and encouragement to filibuster to any other senator, expecting it to be one of the Judiciary Committee members, and none would do it except Kennedy who took a media beating throughout the hearings.

He had no choice but to come out on Thursday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. Yes, Kerry had the guts to fight for us, when our Dem leaders balked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. ROCK ON!!!!!!!!
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wow. Well, now we know which way the wind's blowing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. That's the truth. Will it drive Biden back into camp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. That's the truth. Will it drive Biden back into camp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #21
53. Biden will probably change his mind about
8 times in the coming days. I suppose it will go whichever way the wind is blowing Monday afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. Good news.
That is encouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Write her!!
http://clinton.senate.gov/contact /

Write her and tell her to stand with them!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. H20 Man -
I sincerely do appreciate your calm, hopeful input.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Good news - Here is a list of people who said they supported the
filibuster. Am I missing anybody?

Kerry
Kennedy
Durbin
Feingold
Boxer
Stabenow
Wyden
Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. nominated ---spread this far and wide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. I have a terrific email from Clinton..how couldI post it here?
she explains in detail her reasons for her NO VOTE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
41. Just copy and paste it here
It's not an article, so can't you just paste the entire thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. thanks ..clinton's reason for no on alito
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 11:38 AM by DemInDistress
anuary 26, 2006

Mr.
2218 Throop Avenue
Bronx, New York 10469

Dear Mr.Dem

Because you have shared with me your concerns regarding the nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, I am sending to you in its entirety my statement announcing my decision to vote against his confirmation. I hope that you will read the statement with the same care and thoughtfulness that I gave to this decision. My statement follows.

* * * * * * * * *

The nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr. to the Supreme Court of the United States is a matter of great importance to all of us, our children, and future generations of Americans. This nomination comes to us at a time when many of our cherished constitutional rights and freedoms are imperiled.

The Constitution commands that the United States Senate provide the President with meaningful advice and consent on judicial nominations. I take this constitutional charge seriously. I have carefully reviewed the Committee's hearings and Judge Alito's extensive record and have concluded that I cannot give my consent to his nomination to the Supreme Court.

EXPANDING THE CIRCLE OF LIBERTY
The key to our history has been to expand the circle of freedom and opportunity. That has been the common thread through all the periods of progress in America: greater rights and responsibilities of citizenship and equality. And each time that we have made strides, there have been voices of opposition. There have been those who have wanted to go back. And at those moments of profound importance to America, the Courts have been the guardians of our liberties and stood on the side of greater freedom and opportunity. Consider cases like:
* Brown v. Board of Education, which struck down the notion of "separate but equal."
* Baker v. Carr, which invalidated discriminatory state apportionment schemes and paved the way for the concept of "one man, one vote."
* Griswold v. Connecticut, which recognized a right to privacy in the Constitution.
* Roe v. Wade, which established that women have a right to choose.

We need a judge who will take us forward, not back - keeping with our history of progress. Despite his distinguished credentials, Judge Alito has not shown himself to be that judge. In his career, he has not shown any dedication to civil rights, women's rights and the right to privacy that we need in the next Supreme Court Justice. Time and again, when given the opportunity, he has voted to narrow the circle, to restrict the rights Americans hold dear. And now is not the time to go backwards.

Without the progress we have made in the past 230 years - without the expansion of that circle - I certainly would not be standing before you on the floor of the United States Senate. There would be no opportunity for women in public life. But mine is not the only example. Voting rights would be restricted. Equal opportunities in education and in the workplace would not exist. And none of us would have the right to privacy. Our nation would not be what it is today. Our greatest strength has always been our commitment to enlarging the circle of rights and equality. That great American commitment has made us a beacon around the world.

This nomination could well be the tipping point against constitutionally-based freedoms and protections we cherish as a nation. I fear that Judge Alito will roll back decades of progress and roll over when confronted with an Administration too willing to flaunt the rules and looking for a rubber stamp. The stakes could not be higher.

* Roe v. Wade is at risk.

* The privacy of Americans is at risk as wholesale wiretaps on Americans could be authorized.

* Environmental safeguards, laws that protect workers from abuse or negligence, laws that keep automatic weapons of the streets: all are imperiled.

When I ran for the Senate, I told my constituents that I would only vote for judges who would affirm constitutional precedents like Roe, Brown and other landmark achievements in expanding rights and the reach of equality for all Americans. This is about more than rhetoric. This is very real to me and my constituents. The American people are counting on us not to be a rubber stamp, counting on us to make sure that the President's nominee will not take us backwards.

I also view Judge Alito's nomination through the prism of the seat he will fill. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has shown throughout her career of distinguished service to the Court that one Justice can protect our constitutional rights. Justice O'Connor, while conservative, was a mainstream jurist. She appreciated the advancements we have made as a society and fought to ensure that they would continue on. While I have not always agreed with her rulings, she understood that her vote was often the deciding vote on which key civil liberties and rights rested and exercised it with care.

Judge Alito has not demonstrated a similar commitment to these values. On the contrary, Judge Alito proudly announced his personal opposition to a woman's right to choose early in his career in his now infamous 1985 job application for a position in the Reagan Administration. Although he has tried to distance himself from the comments in that document, his time on the bench shows an unapologetic effort to undermine a woman's right to choose. I believe that abortion should be rare and understand that it is a decision of conscience, but I also believe it should be a constitutionally protected decision between a woman and her doctor. Judge Alito does not share this view, and we can be certain that free from the constraints of Supreme Court precedent, he will intensify his campaign to roll back these and other important privacy rights.

The extreme right wing of the Republican Party was up in arms when President Bush nominated Harriet Miers to the Court to replace Justice O'Connor. Their reaction has been enthusiastic, effusive, and ecstatic this time around. Why? Because they know what they are getting.

Judge Alito's constrained view has not been limited to issues of privacy. While on the Third Circuit, Judge Alito has rarely sided with individuals seeking relief from discrimination on the basis of race, age, gender, or disability. In fact, in the vast majority of civil rights cases, Judge Alito has sided with those who would infringe on the civil rights of Americans. For example, in several dissents, Judge Alito has called for curtailing the reach of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the landmark statute prohibiting discrimination against women and minorities in the workplace.

CHECKS AND BALANCES
I also fear the he will not respect the system of checks and balances our Founding Fathers so carefully set out in the Constitution.

No one who has read the Federalist papers or who read the debate that our Founding Fathers had when constructing the Constitution could underestimate the importance that they placed on having three truly independent and equal branches of government. Checks and balances have long protected us against abuses of power. Again, considering Judge Alito's record, I do not believe he understands or respects this central principle.

Judge Alito has sought to expand the power and purview of the Executive Branch while simultaneously stripping Congress of its authority, undermining our system of checks and balances and curtailing the rights enjoyed by private citizens. For example, while working for the Reagan Administration, Judge Alito made the argument that Cabinet officials who are charged with authorizing illegal wiretaps of Americans in this country should be entitled to absolute immunity.

At a time when the President and his party stand accused of political overreaching and abuse of power, we must demand from our judiciary a respect for the proper role of each of our three branches of government. Judge Alito's excessive deference to presidential authority coupled with his restrictive view of congressional authority tell me that he does not have the proper the reverence for the separation of powers.

THE POWER OF CONGRESS TO PROTECT
And, even worse, while expanding the reach of Presidential power, Judge Alito also holds a harshly limited view of what the government can do to help ordinary Americans.

Judge Alito said it all in 1986, when he was a young lawyer with the Reagan Administration. He wrote that in his estimation, it is not the role of the federal government to protect the "health, safety and welfare" of the American people.

Judge Alito has long advocated a view of limited Congressional authority, which if adhered to, would undermine a whole host of civil rights protections, health and safety regulations, standards for protecting our air and water, food and drug quality regulations, laws regulating firearms, as well as vital programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

Since his ascension to the Third Circuit, Judge Alito has aggressively sought to promote this theory of limited Congressional power. For example, in 1996 Judge Alito voted to invalidate parts of our federal gun laws, arguing that there was no evidence in the record to determine that Congress had the power under the Constitution's Commerce Clause to enact legislation that regulated the sale of machine guns. In another case, Judge Alito wrote an opinion striking down Congress's ability to make a state agency comply with the Family and Medical Leave Act. Just three years later, the Supreme Court, with a similar set of facts, reached precisely the opposite conclusion.

Likewise, in several criminal cases, Judge Alito has shown blatant disregard for a defendant's fundamental right to be tried by an impartial jury, chosen free of racial or gender prejudice and that has been properly instructed on matters of law. He has also narrowly construed other constitutional criminal procedure protections, arguing often in favor of granting law enforcement officials great latitude to conduct unauthorized searches and seizures.

Frequently, Judge Alito has also narrowly interpreted our asylum law, voting to reject the claims of foreign persecution by prospective immigrants.

Judge Alito's opinions on these and other topics remind us that judicial activism can come in many forms. Adopting an unnecessarily narrow view of the Constitution or our laws to reach a desired outcome is a form of judicial activism that is no less offensive than subscribing to an overboard interpretation of the law in order to reach a specific result.

CONCLUSION
Judge Alito may hold a seat on the Supreme Court for a generation, long after President Bush has left office. Perhaps through eight to ten presidential elections, decades of progress would fall prey to his radically conservative ideology, jeopardizing not only civil rights, civil liberties, health and safety, and environmental protections, but also fundamental rights like the right to privacy. Our federal government could be transformed into one where Congress is made irrelevant and the President is permitted to make up the rules as he goes. Judge Alito's vision of America cannot be what our Founding Fathers intended for us. He would take us backward when it has never been more important to move forward.

I sincerely hope that my concerns about Judge Alito are unfounded, but I suspect they are not, and our children will pay the price. He has not demonstrated a proper respect for the rule of law, our Constitution, and the principles Americans hold most dear. I therefore cannot give my consent to his confirmation.

* * * * * * * * * *
Thank you for writing. For updates on this and other important issues being discussed before the United States Senate, please check my website at http://clinton.senate.gov .

Sincerely yours,
Hillary Rodham Clinton

edit to remove my name
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. OMG! It's really happening then
If she has this position then it will actually happen. She is so playing the middle of the road, triangulating 2008 votes, flag burning ammendment kind of crap that if she's on board then they all will be. NYT editorial unleashed it. It gave them permission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
37. Maybe, but then they printed a very obnoxious snarky
article that bashed Kerry mercilessly for leading on this with Kennedy. (They in fact almost ignore the "with Kennedy" part.)

What likely pushed her was "the base" that was demanding that she join in. Once Kerry and Kennedy pushed the issue, she had no real choice - her speech and no vote would be meaningless if she voted for cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
25. OMG...this is the most encouraging news I've heard since Kerry
called for the filibuster. I'm keeping my hopes up! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. Let the first meeting of the "Hopelessly Hopeful" club begin!
I was so despondent on Wednesday. I really thought that the fight was over and the bad guys won. Then Kerry stood up and now Hillary? They are really going to filibuster and I am overjoyed. Will it work? Who knows? But you can't win if your don't try. I'd rather they fight and lose than surrender completely.

:pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
27. WOW
looks like she put her finger in the air and tested the winds! :bounce: :woohoo: :woohoo: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #27
40. let's hope she is a good weather vane
It will be interesting to see how her stance is portrayed after the NYT said that Kerry and Kennedy's quixotic stance was disturbing the Democratic leaders - although Kerry, Kennedy and Hillary qualify as Democratic leaders (at least as much as Reid does.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
I feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samhsarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
34. Woo Hoo!!!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yeah Baaaby! Hillary is speaking her conscience!
Gore, Kerry, Hillary....

These are the kinds of strong voices we need to hear. Hopefully more of our spokespeople jump on board with them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #36
43. self delete -
Edited on Fri Jan-27-06 11:56 AM by karynnj
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
45. good news. Thanks for pposting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamRock Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
46. Needs to SUPPORT publicly, not just say she will vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
47. kickaroo
do we have a chance?????

I sure hope so. Pitt says no but I still hold out hope!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im10ashus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
48. Here's a link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. That's a good resource. I will use it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
49. That's very nice ........
but she's still the great satan. The pond scum of the dreaded DLC. The all powerful Hilgina that will be the death of us all. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
50. Good on her!
:applause:

Now email and thank her! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
52. Good job, Hillary! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
56. No on Cloture equals Yes on Filibuster?
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niche Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-27-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
57. Heard a woman say last night on air america radio that Clinton's
office said "no"... she did give the office her piece of mind though. Hope this is true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Nov 21st 2017, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC