Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Keith Olbermann consider running for political office in 2008?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:35 PM
Original message
Should Keith Olbermann consider running for political office in 2008?
I think he has what it takes to do something like that if he made up his mind to do it. Be really nice if he could either replace one of the DINOs or knock off some Republic in the Senate in '08. He could fill a real nice niche somewhere I betcha.

And he is young too. The sky is the limit.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. You want Olbermann in CONGRESS? Fuck that... UNITARY EXECUTIVE!
Keith Olbermann for Unitary Executive in 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. You mean something like this???


www.cafepress.com/democatic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Boy, that looks really good Rosco T. Real damn good n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. It should say PRESIDENT on it somewhere. Or Unitary Executive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. No; we need him to keep doing exactly what he's been doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree...
Catapulting the truth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I was thinking the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
He's far more valuable where he is.

In my opinion.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pooja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. Journalists who fight for the real news need to stay fighting
for the real news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Only if he bumps his head really badly.
I say this with love for the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. He already bumped his head really badly in 1980, LOL.
And we definitely need him right where he is right now. Or with a bigger audience. But he'd make a lousy politician, because compromise is not his strong point. He's much better off where he is, delivering the truth as he sees it without having to cater to any special interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. You knew
I already knew that. And as for the rest of your comment: I agree with that as well.

He can say what he sees, including what he sees about the ways that other people and media entities are seeing, and how they're saying what they see.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. He'd be great, but earth needs him as a truth teller to power
Sitll in all, he'd be hands down better than 80% of ALL politicians.
Conyers, Jackson-Lee, Waters, Feingold, McDermot ( [email protected] )
all come to my mind as true patriots standing up to power at personal risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. No.
The Conress is a place where people compromise and hedge their words and try to moderate what they say in order not to offend anyone. He would not be able to do the kinds of things he's doing now if he had to worry about his re-election prospects, polls, or whether some wingnut colleague would cooperate with him on a piece of legislation.

Lets let him keep doing what he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thats the rub ain't it? I don't want any compromising on Habeas Corpus
Edited on Sat Oct-21-06 09:00 PM by NNN0LHI
I want my representatives to say absolutely no to any suggestion to suspend Habeas Corpus.

There should be no compromise with something as basic as that in my view.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. no i like him right where he is, same with Stewart, Colbert and various
other good folks that get these "Should so and so run for president" threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. No - he makes the best watchdog ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catbird Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. No.
We need good journalists at least as much as we need good politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Are you nuts????
A nice guy like him. There would be a brawl a day there in congress. He would shame them so badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. Nooooooooo -- We need him *right* where he is.
No matter who is in office. We need all the truthtellers we can get in our media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. No
We need this generation's Murrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. No!
He is an otraged conservative, but he is still a conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. What makes you say he's a conservative?
Other than that he wants to "conserve" the Constitution and real American values?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Conservative? I see no evidence of that...
unless by "conservative" you mean someone who believes in traditional ideas of personal responsibility, fundamental honesty and integrity, basic constitutional principles and individual liberty. Maybe an old-style conservative, but very much the contemporary defintition of a liberal.

If you've seen any evidence suggesting anything else, I'd be curious to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. NO NO NO NO NO
Geez. We get one honest journalist and youse guys want to put him in public office?

Leave the guy alone. He's unique as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chazzio Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. No! Leave KO alone!
Why on earth would anyone want the one journalist(IMO) who has not been completely co-opted or silenced or is in-bed with the administration or the corporate media to join the rest or the crew that only spin news coverage in favor to those who are in power. We desperately need at "least KO who appears to be unique in having cahones enough to speak truth to power and who is a voice for those of us who still believe in the freedoms guaranteed to us by Constitution of the USA. Perhaps his courageous efforts will inspire others to follow his excellent example of what journalism should be about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd rather he become baseball commissioner.
Then ML Baseball would be cleaned out of drugs and inflated salaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. He's just about the only media (TV)
voice we've got --- and it's a voice crying out in the proverbial wilderness. I wish to hell the Democratic party's so-called "leadership" would say some of the things Olbermann, a newsperson, is saying. It's sad and disgraceful that the person throwing it right back into Bush's smirking face is Keith and not the Democratic bigwigs. If Olbermann gets too hot for MSNBC to handle and/or BushCo puts pressure on to get Olbermann fired, then sure. Run for Congress. Run for President. But until he's lost his TV podium we need him exactly where he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. No. Good journalists are an endangered species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Nays have it for good reason. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-21-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
29. No
I wouldn't wish that on my worst enemy, let alone KO. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC