Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RW'ers want to give States the right to suppress your Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 08:10 PM
Original message
RW'ers want to give States the right to suppress your Rights
Many RW'ers say that the Establishment Clause is only for the Federal Government, and that the states CAN have Established Churches.

Here's what one RW'er has said about it.

"Contrary to popular belief, state-sanctioned churches and religious tests are not unconstitutional and do not run counter to what the nation's founders believed, former presidential candidate Alan Keyes said at a rally Aug. 16.

...

If religious tests and established churches were unconstitutional, Keyes said, then they would have been abolished prior to the First Amendment's passage. Such a state-sanctioned church would be sanctioned not by the federal government but instead by an individual state, he said."

http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=16510

Keyes is not alone in voicing this opinion. People such as David Limbaugh and Justice Clarence Thomas agree with him.

Now, we have to ask ourselves if there is an ulterior motive for this interpretation of the First Amendment. I think that there is.

The First Amendment reads as:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

If this interpretation is correct, then it means more than just having Established Churches, it also means that the States can prohibit the free exercise of religion, can violate your freedom of speech, and can dismantle the freedoms of the press, of assembly, and of petitioning the government.

Interesting how the RW'ers don't talk about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. These people are a threat to our freedoms and
traitors to our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. The United Theocratic Republic of Americhristia
That's what these freaks want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-20-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. And if that were true then
There is noting preventing the state from prohibiting the free exercise of religion ether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC