Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I never heard, did Chris Wallace ask Condi about the USS Cole on Sunday?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:44 PM
Original message
I never heard, did Chris Wallace ask Condi about the USS Cole on Sunday?
There was an online movement to send wallace emails asking him to ask Condi about the Cole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks.
What a bitch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Here you go:
"Chris Wallace Ignores 20,000 Emails Demanding He Ask Rice About The U.S.S. Cole

More than 20,000 people emailed Chris Wallace and demanded he ask Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice this question today:

Prior to 9/11, you had eight months to respond to the al-Qaeda attack on the U.S.S. Cole. Why didn’t the Bush administration take action and put al-Qaeda out of business?

Wallace didn’t ask the question or any question on the topic. It’s the twenty-fourth time Rice has been on Fox News Sunday since 9/11 without being asked about the U.S.S. Cole.

Last month, Fox’s Chris Wallace asked President Clinton why he didn’t respond to the Oct. 12, 2000 bombing of the U.S.S. Cole. He asked the question even though the “CIA and the FBI refused to certify that Bin Laden was responsible” until early 2001, which foreclosed the possibility of a full response during the Clinton administration.

Wallace claimed he asked the question of Clinton because “I got a lot of e-mail from viewers.”


http://thinkprogress.org/2006/10/15/wallace-ignores-emails/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Clinton was right; Wallace doesn't ask the other side the same questions
Wallace = dog shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-18-06 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Well, it's the old Yogi Berra schtick ... "Four is too many,
and ten is not enough" ...

A small handful of e-mails (if any) are enough to cause Chris Wallace to attack Bill Clinton ... and 20,000 e-mails is not enough to consider it ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I am shocked, SHOCKED!
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. No. There were "technical difficulties".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Seriously!
They had static and lines and an actual disconnect on air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Chris Wallace is a republican whore
of course he didn't ask
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tyedyeto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. No... C. Wallace only cares about viewers when they are Repugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fortuitous technical difficulties allowed Wallace to avoid asking her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. brought to us by the same staff that put "D-FL" after Foley's name over
and over and over. fox news has earned it's place... at the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC