Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton "double talking" or misquoted in Iowa, regarding Bush's tax cuts.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:20 AM
Original message
Clinton "double talking" or misquoted in Iowa, regarding Bush's tax cuts.
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 09:25 AM by flpoljunkie
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2006-10-15T050028Z_01_N14265662_RTRUKOC_0_US-DEMOCRATS.xml&src=rss&rpc=22

"People know things are out of whack, that fundamentally the order of, the rhythm of public life and our common life as Americans has been severely disturbed," he said.

Clinton criticized the tax cuts President George W. Bush pushed through Congress and urged Democrats running for office this year to promise to correct the imbalance -- and promise not to raise taxes in the process.

(Huh? Pelosi has suggested she will look at rolling back the tax cuts for those making an AGI of $250,000-$300,000. And, why this statement below--an apparent absolving of responsibility for most Republicans for the past six years?)

"You cannot blame the entire Republican party for this reason. The entire government of the United States, the Congress, the White House and increasingly the courts for the last six years has been in the total control not of the Republican party but of the most ideological, the most right wing, the most extreme sliver of the Republican Party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. If past is prologue, then I fear Ma Bush's adopted son was
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 09:28 AM by Benhurst
double talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think he was trying to demonize those who have lead the whole astray
He is saying that the weak are following the evil leadership of both the House and the Senate. They are still wrong and need to suffer the defeat which will one day come their way for their actions.
But the extreme part of the republican party that is lead by the PNAC to destroy the democratic republic are the ones who should be prosecuted and locked up for treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. What about the part about Bush's tax cuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think I see what he's doing...
Clinton's tax comment is reasonable. He's saying that he "promises not to raise taxes"--because Clinton knows that when we talk about rolling back tax gifts for millionaires the Republicans become hysterical and blubber, "OH MY GOD THEY'RE GOING TO RAISE YOUR TAXES!!!!".

My guess--Clinton is making a concise distinction between "raising taxes" and taking away the hefty, tax breaks for millionaires and billionaires that were crafted by the Republicans.

I also like Clinton's statements on the Republican party, and the "most extreme sliver". He's playing hardball. Clinton is identifying and putting under a magnifying glass, the extreme nutjob wing of the Republican party. He's saying...these people who have hijacked the Republican party--are not the entire Republican party. They're a "sliver"...a small faction of howling Fascist scumballs. He's positioning them as a dangerous, perverse minority.

I like the things that Clinton said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. I have to disagree with Clinton. It is both the fault of the extremists
in the party and of the rest of the party that let it happen. People like Chafee, Snowe, Hagel, Collins, ... are as much to blame as Trent Lott and Tom Delay because they did not do anything to stop that.

As for the tax cuts. This is classic Clinton triangulation. I imagine he means to get rid of the tax cuts for higher brackets and not increase taxes over that, but he does not say it, of course, so you can think whatever you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think you are right on both counts, but is it really "triangulation"?
Edited on Tue Oct-17-06 09:38 AM by flpoljunkie
Or is it, shall we say, disingenuous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-17-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't see that as triangulation at all. It's pretty straightforward --
don't pass laws to raise anyones' taxes, simply eliminate some of the tax breaks that have been given to the 1% and the corporations.

it's the flip side of the estate tax deal, where it was arranged to suspend the "death tax" on the reupb watch, then let that bit of legislation expire on what would predictably be the dem watch, so they can scream "the democrats raised our taxes".

It just needs to be reframed as eliminating welfare for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC