Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The irony - married couples now a minority

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 04:42 AM
Original message
The irony - married couples now a minority
I find it quite ironic that while republicans are running on 'family values' and 'sanctity of marriage', they apparently let married couples slip into minority :rofl:

Married couples, whose numbers have been declining for decades as a proportion of American households, have finally slipped into a minority, according to an analysis of new census figures by The New York Times.

The American Community Survey, released this month by the Census Bureau, found that 49.7 percent, or 55.2 million, of the nation’s 111.1 million households in 2005 were made up of married couples — with and without children — just shy of a majority and down from more than 52 percent five years earlier.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/us/15census.html?hp&ex=1160884800&en=48d4d829974274d5&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think we like to look back and say it was always good.
As if the Victorians had some thing we wanted to have. And each age has done the same. Picking your own mate has hardly been better then having your parents do it. They used to be apart in other ways than our modern divorce. I think their was a world study on this a this modern way of marriage a few years ago and it is world wide. The family values of the GOP is a fallacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not surprising to me at all
Edited on Sun Oct-15-06 04:52 AM by SoCalDem
There has been a paradigm shift.. When women did not seek higher education, they HAD to get married if they wanted a family because they could never support them alone..and there was a terrible stigma attached to out-of-wedlock children...and women put up with rotten marriages because there was a stigma attached to divorce as well..

Times have changed.. women now CAN support a family alone, and they are not willing to put up with a rotten marriage.

The whole "white-picket-fence, sheep dog, and station wagon" dream of suburbia is as dead as the original Lassie..

It only really existed for a select few in real life..but the propaganda of it still lives on in movies and tv..

People do buy the "dream" with every penny they can borrow..but they soon figure out that they have little time to actually enjoy it, and every penny they earn goes to just hanging on to it by a fingernail..

It's no wonder people are so unhappy, when they see how they "should" be living, every time they turn on tv or buy a ticket..and yet they know in their hearts they will never live like that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, women had to get married for economic reasons.
So many colleges, universities were off limits to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Folks aren't making as much as they used to. It used to be that only
the husband had to work. But now both the husband and wife have to work to maintain a family. Folks have less of a reason to marry if they aren't planning to build a family, or if they don't feel financially secure enough to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. If they lett gays marry, we'll regain the majority!
C'mon married people let's fight for a bigger slice of the pie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well if Clinton didn't get a BJ then.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-15-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Think of it this way: Less married couples means the divorce rate is
also reduced overall in the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC