Is Soros the new boogey man - Horowitz made baseless claim that Soros...

[bridgit]

...has poured $75 million into midterm elections

'Summary: On Sean Hannity's radio show, David Horowitz attacked nonprofit organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and George Soros, baselessly claiming that Soros has "put $75 million into these congressional elections, and he's doing it behind the façade of -- public interest, tax-exempt, charitable organizations."' http://mediamatters.org/items/200610140003

He's a ferinner, he talks funny, he has money & his own point of view; does that make him republican boggey man candidate #1

[Kagemusha]

1. Yeah, only real heroes like Richard Scaife are allowed to do this.

It's just dirty for some rich liberal to do it. Should be a law against it. :sarcasm:

[markbark]

5. Gee....

Not to mention that OTHER furriner Rupert Murdoch!
:sarcasm:

--MAB

[Jack Rabbit]

2. Horowitz made baseless claim

Does Horowitz make any other kind of claim?

He's used to be one of us, now he's one of them. It was our gain.

[bridgit]

4. the worse kind imo JR...

playing to the cheap seats for a round of stank, canned applause x(

[BlooInBloo]

3. New? ROFL!

[DURHAM D]

6. The funny thing is that most regular folk don't have a

clue who he is. My fundie nephew has been talking about him for years. I always point out to him that the only people who have any idea who Soros is are the people who listen to hate radio. In fact, the first time he was bitching about him I had to ask him who Soros was. Then I asked him about William M. Scaiffe - he had never heard of him naturally,

[bridgit]

7. selective revisionist history...nice work if you can get it i guess...

hate radio has been among the greatest of america's domestic enemies imo

[Captain Hilts]

8. Soros, personally, did a GREAT deal to foster an open press in Russia.

He's a true Democrat.

Wish he'd stay focused on Russia, but I can't blame him for worrying about the US.